• Journal of Geo-information Science
  • Vol. 22, Issue 3, 505 (2020)
Qianjiao WU and Yumin CHEN*
Author Affiliations
  • School of Resource and Environment Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2020.190500 Cite this Article
    Qianjiao WU, Yumin CHEN. A Parallel Method of Surface Flow Dynamics Simulation based on CUDA[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2020, 22(3): 505 Copy Citation Text show less
    Model of the threads by the CUDA
    Fig. 1. Model of the threads by the CUDA
    Transmission mode of data during the parallelization process based on CUDA
    Fig. 2. Transmission mode of data during the parallelization process based on CUDA
    Partition model of thread during the parallelization process based on CUDA
    Fig. 3. Partition model of thread during the parallelization process based on CUDA
    Test DEM of the BBW
    Fig. 4. Test DEM of the BBW
    TINs on the sub-region under different thresholds
    Fig. 5. TINs on the sub-region under different thresholds
    Flow pathnetworks on the sub-region under different scales of the rainfall points (threshold is 0.5m)
    Fig. 6. Flow pathnetworks on the sub-region under different scales of the rainfall points (threshold is 0.5m)
    Comparison of the simulated results at the BBW's outlet
    Fig. 7. Comparison of the simulated results at the BBW's outlet
    Speed ratio under different scales of the rainfall points
    Fig. 8. Speed ratio under different scales of the rainfall points
    Nash coefficient distribution map of simulation results
    Fig. 9. Nash coefficient distribution map of simulation results
    Correlation coefficient distribution map of simulation results
    Fig. 10. Correlation coefficient distribution map of simulation results
    Balance coefficient distribution map of simulation results
    Fig. 11. Balance coefficient distribution map of simulation results
    阈值/m0.51.01.52.02.5
    特征点数量/个10 859429521491268822
    TIN表面三角面的数量/个23 34811 079685451394285
    RMSE/m0.170.310.450.580.73
    Table 1. The accuracy of TIN under different thresholds on the BBW
    阈值/m算法模型降雨源点尺度/m
    1015202530
    0.5基于TIN的地表水动态模拟算法N0.770.770.770.770.77
    R0.910.910.910.910.91
    B1.301.311.311.301.30
    基于CUDA的地表水动态模拟并行方法N0.770.770.770.770.77
    R0.910.910.910.910.91
    B1.301.311.311.301.30
    1.0基于TIN的地表水动态模拟算法N0.770.770.770.770.77
    R0.910.910.910.910.91
    B1.311.311.311.311.31
    基于CUDA的地表水动态模拟并行方法N0.770.770.770.770.77
    R0.910.910.910.910.91
    B1.311.311.311.311.31
    1.5基于TIN的地表水动态模拟算法N0.770.770.770.770.77
    R0.910.910.910.910.91
    B1.311.311.321.321.31
    基于CUDA的地表水动态模拟并行方法N0.770.770.770.770.77
    R0.910.910.910.910.91
    B1.311.311.321.321.31
    2.0基于TIN的地表水动态模拟算法N0.770.770.770.770.77
    R0.910.910.910.910.91
    B1.311.321.311.321.31
    基于CUDA的地表水动态模拟并行方法N0.770.770.770.770.77
    R0.910.910.910.910.91
    B1.311.321.311.321.31
    2.5基于TIN的地表水动态模拟算法N0.770.770.770.770.77
    R0.910.910.910.910.91
    B1.311.311.321.321.32
    基于CUDA的地表水动态模拟并行方法N0.770.770.770.770.77
    R0.910.910.910.910.91
    B1.311.311.321.321.32
    Table 2. Accuracy comparison of simulating the flow discharge at the outlet of the BBW
    评价参数
    NRB
    SWAT0.410.870.96
    Table 3. Statistical factors utilized to assess the precision of SWAT model (scale of DEM is 30 m)
    阈值/m算法降雨源点尺度/m
    1015202530
    0.5基于TIN的地表水动态模拟算法953.82425.37278.18213.77169.77
    基于CUDA的地表水动态模拟并行方法93.1643.4928.3422.7219.00
    1.0基于TIN的地表水动态模拟算法912.16407.40278.21203.25159.87
    基于CUDA的地表水动态模拟并行方法86.3242.7527.7221.2318.47
    1.5基于TIN的地表水动态模拟算法899.07395.99267.96196.33159.60
    基于CUDA的地表水动态模拟并行方法80.5141.8827.2320.7417.88
    2.0基于TIN的地表水动态模拟算法893.92396.22270.80198.07159.21
    基于CUDA的地表水动态模拟并行方法86.1443.8628.0121.3917.95
    2.5基于TIN的地表水动态模拟算法892.59400.38260.40199.60164.56
    基于CUDA的地表水动态模拟并行方法85.6143.6027.7720.8017.29
    Table 4. Computation performance of simulating the flow discharge at the outlet of the BBW (s)
    Qianjiao WU, Yumin CHEN. A Parallel Method of Surface Flow Dynamics Simulation based on CUDA[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2020, 22(3): 505
    Download Citation