• High Power Laser Science and Engineering
  • Vol. 8, Issue 2, 02000e26 (2020)
Maria Alkhimova1, Sergey Ryazantsev2, Igor Skobelev2, Alexey Boldarev3, Jie Feng4, Xin Lu5, Li-Ming Chen6, and Sergey Pikuz2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Joint Institute of High Temperature of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow125412, Russia
  • 2Joint Institute of High Temperature of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow125412, Russia
  • 3Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 125047, Russia
  • 4Beijing National Laboratory of Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China
  • 5Beijing National Laboratory of Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China
  • 6Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai200240, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1017/hpl.2020.21 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Maria Alkhimova, Sergey Ryazantsev, Igor Skobelev, Alexey Boldarev, Jie Feng, Xin Lu, Li-Ming Chen, Sergey Pikuz. Clean source of soft X-ray radiation formed in supersonic Ar gas jets by high-contrast femtosecond laser pulses of relativistic intensity[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2020, 8(2): 02000e26 Copy Citation Text show less
    (a) General scheme of the experimental setup. (b) Central cross-section of the nozzle. (c) Coordinates of the focal spot position.
    Fig. 1. (a) General scheme of the experimental setup. (b) Central cross-section of the nozzle. (c) Coordinates of the focal spot position.
    (a), (b) X-ray emission spectra and (c)–(e) corresponding electron measurement results detected in -direction (laser propagation axis) for the following experimental conditions: inlet gas pressure – , laser energy – , laser beam is focused at the center of Ar gas jet, perpendicularly to gas flow -axis at the distance from nozzle outlet (a), (c), (d) and (b), (e) .
    Fig. 2. (a), (b) X-ray emission spectra and (c)–(e) corresponding electron measurement results detected in -direction (laser propagation axis) for the following experimental conditions: inlet gas pressure – , laser energy – , laser beam is focused at the center of Ar gas jet, perpendicularly to gas flow -axis at the distance from nozzle outlet (a), (c), (d) and (b), (e) .
    X-ray emission spectra of Ar plasma depend on – laser focusing point displacement from nozzle outlet , measured at fixed parameters: inlet Ar gas pressure – , laser energy on target – , laser pulse duration – , laser contrast – in diagnostic direction (a) , (b) and (c) . Note that, the X-ray intensity on axis of ordinates is given in absolute values.
    Fig. 3. X-ray emission spectra of Ar plasma depend on – laser focusing point displacement from nozzle outlet , measured at fixed parameters: inlet Ar gas pressure – , laser energy on target – , laser pulse duration – , laser contrast – in diagnostic direction (a) , (b)  and (c) . Note that, the X-ray intensity on axis of ordinates is given in absolute values.
    (a) Dependence of the X-ray emission registered in the -direction on (the distance from the nozzle outlet to the laser focusing point). Simulated spectra obtained by the radiational–collisional code PrismSpect for different electron temperatures , fixed atomic densities and the hot electrons fraction of 0.1% with the temperature are shown by the red lines. (b) X-ray yield per laser shot of photons with the energy of versus distance from the nozzle throat for diagnostic directions , and . (c) Results of hydrodynamic calculations for the gas jet density profile for the slit nozzle MS05-10-166[24] and different .
    Fig. 4. (a) Dependence of the X-ray emission registered in the -direction on (the distance from the nozzle outlet to the laser focusing point). Simulated spectra obtained by the radiational–collisional code PrismSpect for different electron temperatures , fixed atomic densities and the hot electrons fraction of 0.1% with the temperature are shown by the red lines. (b) X-ray yield per laser shot of photons with the energy of versus distance from the nozzle throat for diagnostic directions , and . (c) Results of hydrodynamic calculations for the gas jet density profile for the slit nozzle MS05-10-166[24] and different .
    Dependence of Ar plasma X-ray emission spectra on the laser pulse energy . The X-ray emission was observed in (a) -direction, (b) -direction and (c) -direction. The X-ray emission spectra have been measured under the following experimental conditions: entry pressure of the Ar gas jet – , the distance from nozzle outlet to laser focus position – , laser pulse duration – , laser pulse contrast – .
    Fig. 5. Dependence of Ar plasma X-ray emission spectra on the laser pulse energy . The X-ray emission was observed in (a) -direction, (b) -direction and (c) -direction. The X-ray emission spectra have been measured under the following experimental conditions: entry pressure of the Ar gas jet – , the distance from nozzle outlet to laser focus position – , laser pulse duration – , laser pulse contrast – .
    (a) The comparison of the Ar plasma X-ray emission spectra measured for two different laser pulse energies and and kinetic modeling carried out with the PrismSpect. The calculations have been done for the fixed parameters: the ion density of the Ar gas jet – , fraction 0.1% of hot electrons with . (b) Yield of X-ray photons with the energies versus the incident laser pulse energy.
    Fig. 6. (a) The comparison of the Ar plasma X-ray emission spectra measured for two different laser pulse energies and and kinetic modeling carried out with the PrismSpect. The calculations have been done for the fixed parameters: the ion density of the Ar gas jet – , fraction 0.1% of hot electrons with . (b) Yield of X-ray photons with the energies versus the incident laser pulse energy.
    (a) X-ray emission spectra of Ar plasma; (b) X-ray photons yield – at the energy range versus the laser pulse duration – ; (c) X-ray photons yield – in the energy range versus entry Ar gas pressure – , observed for the laser focusing position for diagnostic directions , and toward the axis of the laser propagation direction.
    Fig. 7. (a) X-ray emission spectra of Ar plasma; (b) X-ray photons yield – at the energy range versus the laser pulse duration – ; (c) X-ray photons yield – in the energy range versus entry Ar gas pressure – , observed for the laser focusing position for diagnostic directions , and toward the axis of the laser propagation direction.
    Maria Alkhimova, Sergey Ryazantsev, Igor Skobelev, Alexey Boldarev, Jie Feng, Xin Lu, Li-Ming Chen, Sergey Pikuz. Clean source of soft X-ray radiation formed in supersonic Ar gas jets by high-contrast femtosecond laser pulses of relativistic intensity[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2020, 8(2): 02000e26
    Download Citation