Author Affiliations
1Joint Institute of High Temperature of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow125412, Russia2Joint Institute of High Temperature of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow125412, Russia3Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 125047, Russia4Beijing National Laboratory of Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China5Beijing National Laboratory of Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China6Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai200240, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. (a) General scheme of the experimental setup. (b) Central cross-section of the nozzle. (c) Coordinates of the focal spot position.
Fig. 2. (a), (b) X-ray emission spectra and (c)–(e) corresponding electron measurement results detected in
-direction (laser propagation axis) for the following experimental conditions: inlet gas pressure –
, laser energy –
, laser beam is focused at the center of Ar gas jet, perpendicularly to gas flow
-axis at the distance from nozzle outlet (a), (c), (d)
and (b), (e)
.
Fig. 3. X-ray emission spectra of Ar plasma depend on
– laser focusing point displacement from nozzle outlet
, measured at fixed parameters: inlet Ar gas pressure –
, laser energy on target –
, laser pulse duration –
, laser contrast –
in diagnostic direction (a)
, (b)
and (c)
. Note that, the X-ray intensity on axis of ordinates is given in absolute values.
Fig. 4. (a) Dependence of the X-ray emission registered in the
-direction on
(the distance from the nozzle outlet to the laser focusing point). Simulated spectra obtained by the radiational–collisional code PrismSpect for different electron temperatures
, fixed atomic densities and the hot electrons fraction of 0.1% with the temperature
are shown by the red lines. (b) X-ray yield per laser shot of photons with the energy of
versus distance from the nozzle throat
for diagnostic directions
,
and
. (c) Results of hydrodynamic calculations for the gas jet density profile for the slit nozzle MS05-10-166
[24] and different
.
Fig. 5. Dependence of Ar plasma X-ray emission spectra on the laser pulse energy
. The X-ray emission was observed in (a)
-direction, (b)
-direction and (c)
-direction. The X-ray emission spectra have been measured under the following experimental conditions: entry pressure of the Ar gas jet –
, the distance from nozzle outlet to laser focus position –
, laser pulse duration –
, laser pulse contrast –
.
Fig. 6. (a) The comparison of the Ar plasma X-ray emission spectra measured for two different laser pulse energies
and
and kinetic modeling carried out with the PrismSpect. The calculations have been done for the fixed parameters: the ion density of the Ar gas jet –
, fraction 0.1% of hot electrons with
. (b) Yield of X-ray photons with the energies
versus the incident laser pulse energy.
Fig. 7. (a) X-ray emission spectra of Ar plasma; (b) X-ray photons yield –
at the energy range
versus the laser pulse duration –
; (c) X-ray photons yield –
in the energy range
versus entry Ar gas pressure –
, observed for the laser focusing position
for diagnostic directions
,
and
toward the axis of the laser propagation direction.