• Advanced Imaging
  • Vol. 2, Issue 2, 021002 (2025)
Haolong Jia1,†, Guozhong Lei1, Wenhui Wang1, Jingqi Liu1..., Jiaming Xu1, Wenda Cui1,2,3, Wenchang Lai1,2,3,* and Kai Han1,2,3,*|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China
  • 2Nanhu Laser Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China
  • 3Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of High Energy Laser Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AI.2025.10025 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Haolong Jia, Guozhong Lei, Wenhui Wang, Jingqi Liu, Jiaming Xu, Wenda Cui, Wenchang Lai, Kai Han, "100 fps single-pixel imaging illuminated by a Fermat spiral fiber laser array," Adv. Imaging 2, 021002 (2025) Copy Citation Text show less
    The generation process of illumination light fields by the fiber laser array.
    Fig. 1. The generation process of illumination light fields by the fiber laser array.
    Simulation results of illumination light fields of different arrays. (a1)–(a3) Array configurations: top to bottom, rectangle, hexagon, and Fermat spiral; (b1)–(b3) 3D g(2) distribution for each configuration; (c1)–(c3) g(2) distribution along the u-axis; (d1)–(d3) g(2) distribution along the v-axis; (e1)–(e3) vertical view of g(2) distribution.
    Fig. 2. Simulation results of illumination light fields of different arrays. (a1)–(a3) Array configurations: top to bottom, rectangle, hexagon, and Fermat spiral; (b1)–(b3) 3D g(2) distribution for each configuration; (c1)–(c3g(2) distribution along the u-axis; (d1)–(d3g(2) distribution along the v-axis; (e1)–(e3) vertical view of g(2) distribution.
    Imaging simulations of rectangle, hexagon, and Fermat spiral arrays. Left: binary “3-slits”; Right: grayscale “drone.” Reconstructed via DGI and CS-TV.
    Fig. 3. Imaging simulations of rectangle, hexagon, and Fermat spiral arrays. Left: binary “3-slits”; Right: grayscale “drone.” Reconstructed via DGI and CS-TV.
    Simulation results of g(2) for different N. (a1)–(a4) Array configs with different N; (b1)–(b4) 3D g(2) distributions; (c1)–(c4) vertical views for g(2) with different N.
    Fig. 4. Simulation results of g(2) for different N. (a1)–(a4) Array configs with different N; (b1)–(b4) 3D g(2) distributions; (c1)–(c4) vertical views for g(2) with different N.
    Simulation imaging results of different N.
    Fig. 5. Simulation imaging results of different N.
    RMSEs of the images of different N.
    Fig. 6. RMSEs of the images of different N.
    System schematic of SPI illuminated by the Fermat spiral fiber laser array.
    Fig. 7. System schematic of SPI illuminated by the Fermat spiral fiber laser array.
    High-speed data synchronous acquisition system diagram. (a) 20 kHz synch signals; (b) the time-varying phase modulation attached to the beam by the phase modulator; (c) the acquired illumination light field; (d) the time-varying normalized light intensity values detected by the SPD.
    Fig. 8. High-speed data synchronous acquisition system diagram. (a) 20 kHz synch signals; (b) the time-varying phase modulation attached to the beam by the phase modulator; (c) the acquired illumination light field; (d) the time-varying normalized light intensity values detected by the SPD.
    Results of 2000 acquired illumination light fields. (a) An acquired illumination light field; (b) the 3D distribution of g(2); (c) viewing the 3D distribution of g(2) from the positive direction of the v-axis; (d) viewing the 3D distribution of g(2) from the positive direction of the u-axis.
    Fig. 9. Results of 2000 acquired illumination light fields. (a) An acquired illumination light field; (b) the 3D distribution of g(2); (c) viewing the 3D distribution of g(2) from the positive direction of the v-axis; (d) viewing the 3D distribution of g(2) from the positive direction of the u-axis.
    Experimental imaging results. Images reconstructed by DGI, CS-TV, and UNN at different samples. The object is a transmissive “2.” The red text indicates the lowest samples for distinguishable imaging.
    Fig. 10. Experimental imaging results. Images reconstructed by DGI, CS-TV, and UNN at different samples. The object is a transmissive “2.” The red text indicates the lowest samples for distinguishable imaging.
    The distribution of g(2) for different samples. (a1)–(a4) Viewing the 3D distribution of g(2) from the positive direction of the v-axis, (b1)–(b4) Viewing the 3D distribution of g(2) from the positive direction of the u-axis.
    Fig. 11. The distribution of g(2) for different samples. (a1)–(a4) Viewing the 3D distribution of g(2) from the positive direction of the v-axis, (b1)–(b4) Viewing the 3D distribution of g(2) from the positive direction of the u-axis.
    SSIM values at different samples, with the g(2)(u,v;u0,v0) at 2000 samples serving as the reference.
    Fig. 12. SSIM values at different samples, with the g(2)(u,v;u0,v0) at 2000 samples serving as the reference.
    SampleCount of elements in g(2)>1.2Count of elements in g(2)>1.15
    1001651
    2001240
    4001231
    6001221
    20001117
    Table 1. Count of Elements in g(2) Greater Than 1.2 and 1.15 Across Different Samples.
    Haolong Jia, Guozhong Lei, Wenhui Wang, Jingqi Liu, Jiaming Xu, Wenda Cui, Wenchang Lai, Kai Han, "100 fps single-pixel imaging illuminated by a Fermat spiral fiber laser array," Adv. Imaging 2, 021002 (2025)
    Download Citation