Author Affiliations
1Department of Mathematical Sciences, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia2Department of Physics, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), P.O. Box 5701, Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia3Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabiashow less
Fig. 1. Temporal evolution of for the SLAS when the field initially prepared in a SCS with The subfigures (a, b, c) are for with different values of the parameter r. (a) is for r ⟶ 0, (b) is for r = 0.3 and (c) is for r = 1.5. The subfigures (d, e, f) are for the I-DC function with the same values of r as in (a, b, c).
Fig. 2. Temporal evolution of for the SLAS when the field initially prepared in a SCS with |α|2 = 25. The subfigures (a, b, c) are for and for different values of the parameter r. (a) is for r ⟶ 0, (b) is for r = 0.3 and (c) is for r = 1.5. The subfigures (d, e, f) are for the I-DC function with the same values of r as in (a, b, c).
Fig. 3. Temporal evolution of QM for the field initially prepared in a SCS with |α|2 = 25. The subfigures (a, b, c) are for with different values of the parameter r. (a) is for r ⟶ 0, (b) is for r = 0.3 and (c) is for r = 1.5. The subfigures (d, e, f) are for the I-DC function with the same values of r as in (a, b, c).