Author Affiliations
1Institute of Nuclear Analysis Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China2Jiangsu University Collaborative Innovation Center for Radiation Medicine, Suzhou 215031, China3College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Nanjing 211106, China4Suzhou Guanrui Information Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215008, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Map of obstacles to a hypothetical nuclear accident site: (a) reference terrain of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant; (b) simulated raster map (color online)
Fig. 2. Normalized radiation dose field calculated by Monte Carlo simulation (color online)
Fig. 3. Diagram of lateral connections of neurons
Fig. 4. Eight bit movement diagram
Fig. 5. Flow chart of unit decomposition method
Fig. 6. Cover times map (color online)
Fig. 7. Real-time dose metrics variation chart: (a) real-time dose rate variation chart; (b) real-time cumulative dose variation chart
Fig. 8. Mobile unit path graph (color online)
Fig. 9. Cow-tillage partition diagram
Fig. 10. Arch overlay strategy diagram
Fig. 11. Flowchart of the algorithm for adding cumulative dose monitoring
Fig. 12. Cover times diagram of 4 units simulation(color online)
Fig. 13. Real-time dose metrics variation chart of 4 units simulation: (a) real-time dose rate variation chart; (b) real-time cumulative dose variation chart (color online)
Fig. 14. Path diagram of 4 units simulation (color online)
Fig. 15. Cover times diagram of 8 units simulation(color online)
Fig. 16. Real-time dose metrics variation chart of 8 units simulation: (a) real-time dose rate variation chart; (b) real-time cumulative dose variation chart (color online)
Fig. 17. Path diagram of 8 units simulation (color online)
| 元素 Chemical element | 质量比 Mass ratio |
---|
混凝土 Concrete | H | 0.65 | O | 49.83 | Na | 1.71 | Mg | 0.24 | Al | 4.54 | Si | 31.50 | S | 0.12 | K | 1.92 | Ca | 8.25 | Fe | 1.22 | 空气 Air | N | 0.76 | O | 0.23 | Ar | 0.01 |
|
Table 1. Material element composition
能量 / MeV Energy | 归一化后的 比例分布 / % Normalized proportional distribution |
---|
0.049 72 | 7.259 3 | 0.228 17 | 42.588 0 | 0.284 30 | 1.082 6 | 0.328 76 | 0.103 8 | 0.364 48 | 14.505 7 | 0.487 02 | 0.232 6 | 0.636 98 | 1.296 9 | 0.652 92 | 3.669 7 | 0.662 00 | 2.416 0 | 0.749 81 | 10.871 6 | 0.815 77 | 0.119 0 | 1.024 61 | 15.367 0 | 1.596 20 | 0.487 7 |
|
Table 2. Radioactive source gamma ray energy composition
| 完成全覆盖步数 Complete the full coverage steps | 时间 / s Time | 重复率 / % Repetition rate | 累积剂量 / mSv Cumulative dose |
---|
生物启发神经网络 Biologically inspired neural networks | 364 | 1 820 | 4.00 | 0.004 11 | 单元分解法 Unit decomposition method | 499 | 2 495 | 42.57 | 0.005 80 |
|
Table 3. The evaluation index comparison of a unit full coverage simulation test
| 完成全覆盖总步数 Complete the full coverage steps | 时间 / s Time | 重复率 / % Repetition rate | 所有单元的总剂量 / mSv Total dose for all units | 单体最大累积剂量 / mSv Monomer maximum cumulative dose |
---|
1单元仿真 1 cell simulation | 364 | 1 820 | 4.00 | 0.004 11 | 0.004 11 | 4单元仿真 4 cells simulation | 370 | 540 | 5.71 | 0.004 34 | 0.0012 77 | 8单元仿真 8 cells simulation | 372 | 240 | 6.29 | 0.004 24 | 0.0008 45 |
|
Table 4. Comparison of simulation test results