Abstract
Recently, an ultra-short and ultra-intense laser with a peak power of the petawatt (PW) level has been continually constructed, which creates unprecedented extreme physical conditions, such as ultra-intense electromagnetic field, ultra-high energy density, and ultra-fast time scale. Until now, there are several countries preparing to construct ultra-short and ultra-intense laser facilities, which intend to reach the 10 PW level. The Extreme Light Infrastructure (ELI) project that has been included in the large scale scientific facility development road map by the European Union, aims at constructing a 10 PW level output facility in 2017[
In this Letter, the PL spectrum, output energy, output signal spectrum, and output beam profile have been systematically measured and analyzed based on the 100 mm aperture Ti:sapphire amplifier. The evolutionary process from amplified spontaneous emission to PL has also been observed. By close comparison and analytic study, we found that PL would occur before the peak energy point of the amplified laser pulse. In some ranges, the signal pulse can still be amplified even if PL exists. As we expected, PL can decrease the amplified energy of the output pulse in the CPA system. Besides, our experimental results show that PL does not influence the spectrum and beam profile of the amplified laser pulse.
Figure
Sign up for Chinese Optics Letters TOC. Get the latest issue of Chinese Optics Letters delivered right to you!Sign up now
Figure 1.(a) 100 mm Ti:sapphire amplifier; (b) the cylindrical and end surface spectrum detection method.
First, we measure the cylindrical surface spectrums under different pump energies without an input signal pulse. The detection method is illustrated in Fig.
Figure 2.Cylindrical surface spectrum under 10 J pump energy.
Figure 3.Cylindrical surface spectra under different pump energies.
In order to verify that the spectrum we obtain at the cylindrical surface is emitted from the cylindrical surface rather than from the end surface, we place two probes at the cylindrical and end surfaces separately, as shown in Fig.
Figure
Figure 4.Comparison of spectra from Ti:sapphire crystal cylindrical and end surfaces.
Then, we study the signal spectrums before and after PL. Figure
Figure 5.Ti:sapphire cylindrical surface spectra under different pump energies.
The relation between pump energy and Ti:sapphire amplifier output energy without cladding has also been studied. Figure
Figure 6.Ti:sapphire output energy as function of pump energy.
The input energy of amplifier is set at 5.8 J. If there is no pump laser after the signal laser passes through the Ti:sapphire crystal three times, the output signal laser energy will decrease to about 4.8 J. The amplifier output energy reaches the highest point of 16.9 J when the pump energy is 38 J. As the pump energy increases from 30 to 38 J, the amplifier output energy continues to increase. While in Fig.
The influence of PL on the beam profile has also been considered. Figure
Figure 7.Beam profiles under different pump energies. (a) 20 J pump energy; (b) 72 J pump energy.
In conclusion, the PL spectrum, the relation between PL and amplified spontaneous emission, and the influence of PL on Ti:sapphire amplifier output energy, signal spectrum, and beam profile are systematically studied. The transient process from amplified spontaneous emission to PL in the Ti:sapphire crystal is observed. It is found that the signal pulse can still be amplified in a range even when PL occurrs. Yet, PL has no obvious impact on the amplified output signal spectrum and beam profile.
References
[1] G. A. Mourou, G. Koron, W. Sandner, J. L. Collier. ELI–Extreme Light Infrastructure, Science and Technology with Ultra-Intense Lasers(2011).
[2] V. Chvykov, M. Kalashnikov, K. Osvay. 2015 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Pacific Rim, 27D1_3(2015).
[3] F. Lureau, S. Laux, O. Casagrande, O. Chalus, P. A. Duvochelle, S. Herriot, G. Matras, C. Radier, L. Boudjemaa, C. Simon-Boisson, R. Dabu, I. Dancus, D. Ursescu. 2015 European Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics-European Quantum Electronics Conference, CF_P_20(2015).
[4] C. L. Arnold, F. Brizuela, A. Borot, F. Calegari, D. Charalambidis, T. Cowan, Z. Diveki, P. Dombi, J. Fulop, J. Hebling, C. M. Heyl, A. L’Huillier, D. A. Jaroszynski, P. Johnsson, V. Malka, M. Kalashnikov, M. Kaluza, R. Lopez-Martens, M. Nisoli, K. Osvay, G. Paulus, F. Quéré, E. Racz, A. Rouzée, P. Rudawski, C. Spindloe, M. Tolley, P. Tzallas, M. Vrakking. CLEO: 2013, OSA Technical Digest, JTh2A.13(2013).
[5] S. Gales, N. V. Zamfir. AIP Conf. Proc., 1645, 201(2015).
[6] G. Chériaux, F. Giambruno, A. Fréneaux. AIP Conf. Proc., 1462, 78(2012).
[7] C. H. Gomez, S. P. Blake, O. Chekhlov, R. J. Clarke, A. M. Dunne, M. Galimberti, S. Hancock, R. Heathcote, P. Holligan, A. Lyachev, P. Matousek, I. O. Musgrave, D. Neely, P. A. Norreys, I. Ross, Y. Tang, T. B. Winstone, B. E. Wyborn. J. Phys.: Conf. Series, 244, 032006(2010).
[9] M. P. Kalashnikov, H. Cao, K. Osvay, V. Chvykov, N. Khodakovskiy, R. S. Nagymihaly. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, SM1M.2(2016).
[11] M. E. Graham, B. I. Davis, D. V. Keller. Appl. Opt., 4, 613(1965).
[12] V. V. Chvykov, V. P. Yanovsky, S. W. Bahk, G. Kalintchenko, G. Morou. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics/Quantum Electronics and Lasers Science Conference, Technical Digest, CWA34(2003).
[13] V. V. Chvykov, M. Kalashnikov, K. Osvay. Advanced Solid State Lasers, ATu2A.39(2015).
[15] X. Liang, Y. Leng, C. Wang, C. Li, L. Lin, B. Zhao, Y. Jiang, X. Lu, M. Hu, C. Zhang, H. Lu, D. Yin, Y. Jiang, X. Lu, H. Wei, J. Zhu, R. Li, Z. Xu. Opt. Express, 15, 23(2007).
[16] X. Zhang, Y. Chai, C. Qi. Chin. J. Lumin., 11, 4(1990).
[17] J. Zhang, Z. Sun, Z. Wang, J. Si, J. Wang, Y. Hang, J. Xu. J. Synth. Cryst., 34, 4(2005).
Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address