Author Affiliations
1Ningbo Institute of Technology, Beihang University, Ningbo 315800, Zhejiang , China2National Engineering Laboratory of Additive Manufacturing for Large Metallic Components, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Material‒structure‒performance integrated LAM technology in multifunctional design and manufacturing
[7] Fig. 2. Morphology and cracking mechanism of solidification crack in LAM nickel-based superalloys. (a) Correlation between solid phase fraction and solidification cracking index (SCI)
[24]; (b) schematic diagram of cracking mechanism
[25]; (c) solidification crack in CM247LC alloy
[24]; (d) solidification crack in IN939 alloy
[24] Fig. 3. Morphology and cracking mechanism of liquation crack in LAM nickel-based superalloys. (a) Constitutional liquation
[1,24];
Fig. 4. Differential scanning calorimetry curves and morphology of ABD-850AM, CM247LC and IN939 alloys
[24] Fig. 5. DDC and its relationship with temperature in LAM nickel-based superalloys. (a) Morphology of DDC in IN738 alloy
[34];
Fig. 6. Calculation and design of formable new γ' phase strengthened nickel-based superalloys. (a) Relationship between SAC risk and Al, Ti+Nb+Ta contents
[24]; (b) γ' phase morphology and size in different generations of nickel-based single crystal superalloys
[40]; (c) relationship between mole fraction of γ' phase and SAC merit index
[24]; (d) relationship between creep life and SAC merit index
[24] Fig. 7. Relationship between the integrity of LAM component and process parameters and alloy composition
[9,37]. (a) Defects caused by incompatibility between laser process parameters and alloy composition; (b) influence of composition optimization on solidification characteristics and formability of alloys
Fig. 8. Inhibitory effect of composition modification on crack in nickel-based superalloys. (a) Mechanism of reduced cracking sensitivity in new γ' phase strengthened MAD542 alloy
[41]; (b) influence of Zr content on crack density, size and quantity of carbide and Δ
T of IN738LC alloy
[45] Fig. 9. Inhibitory effect of adding nanoparticles on crack in nickel-based superalloys. (a) Influence of 2.5% TiC on grain morphology and solute enrichment in IN738LC alloy
[51]; (b) influence of 0.1% GNPs on grain morphology and dislocation distribution in K418 alloy
[52] Fig. 10. Defect control and mechanical properties of LAM IN738LC alloy
[18]. (a) Formability of IN738LC alloy under different laser powers and scanning speeds; (b) LPBF process map of IN738LC alloy; (c) influence of post-processing on tensile properties of as-printed samples at room temperature; (d) jet turbine blade fabricated by LPBF
Fig. 11. Thermodynamics-guided LAM superalloy design process
[72]. (a) Interdendritic composition segregation measured by APT; (b) influence of partitioning behavior of alloy element on
Tsolidus; (c) influence of alloy element on driving forces of phase formation, and a schematic diagram of the whole design process
Fig. 12. Prediction of crack susceptibility in LAM nickel-based superalloy
[76]. (a) Construction process of ML model; (b) fitting performance of ML models on training sets; (c) comprehensive influence of elements on crack susceptibility evaluated by ML prediction model
Fig. 13. Relationship between composition and formability of nickel-based superalloys. (a) Formability of nickel-based superalloys represented by the contents of Al+Ti and Cr+Co
[38]; (b) composition distribution of formable/unformable superalloys in
‒
system
Fig. 14. Cracking resistance and mechanical properties of MNiHEA alloy
[93]. (a) Relationship between average SCI value and solidification cracking in the last solidification stage; (b) uniaxial tensile engineering stress-strain curves; (c) strengthening and toughening mechanisms of as-built and aged alloys
Fig. 15. Research on cracking behavior of LAM γ' phase strengthened nickel-based superalloys. (a) Summary of cracks causes and control methods
[66]; (b) comparison of room-temperature tensile properties of representative formable and unformable superalloys before and after crack control
[1] Alloy element | Metallurgical performance |
---|
Co, Cr, Fe, Mo, W, Ta, Re | Solid-solution strengthener | W, Ta, Ti, Mo, Nb, Hf | Carbide form | MC | Cr | M7C3 | Cr, Mo, W | M23C6 | Mo, W, Nb | M6C | C, N | Carbonitrides: M(CN) | Al, Ti | γ′-Ni3 (Al, Ti) phase | Co | Solvus temperature of γ′ phase | Al, Ti, Nb, Ta | Intermetallics | Al, Cr, Y, La, Ce | Oxidation resistance | La, Th | Hot corrosion resistance | Cr, Co, Si | Sulfidation | B, Ta | Creep resistance | B | Rupture strength | B, C, Zr, Hf | Grain refinement | Re | Retard γ′ coarsening |
|
Table 1. Effects of elements on the metallurgical performance of γ' phase strengthened nickel-based superalloys
[16] Alloy | Composition | Cluster formula |
---|
IN100 | Ni57.6Co12.6Al11.1Ti5.1V1.1Cr10.3 Mo2 | [Al‒] | MAR-M247 | Ni62Co10.1Al12.3Ti1.2Ta1Cr9.8Mo0.4W3.2 | [Al‒] | CMSX-4 | Ni63.6Co9.3Re1Al12.6Ti1.3Ta2.2Cr7.6Mo0.4W2 | [Al‒] | René N5 | Ni63.3Co8.4Re1.1Al13.9Ta2.3Cr8.1Mo1.2W1.7 | [Al‒] | René 142 | Ni60.7Co12.2Re0.9Al13.8Ta2.1Cr7.8Mo0.9W1.6 | [Al‒] | IN738LC | Ni59.1Co8.3Fe0.2Al7.6Ti4.1Nb0.6Ta0.6Cr17.5Mo1.1W0.9 | [Al‒] | U700 | Ni49.6Co17.4Fe1Al8.9Ti4.1Cr16Mo3 | [Al‒] | René 80 | Ni59.5Co8.9Al6.4Ti6.1Cr15.3Mo2.5W1.3 | [Al‒] | IN738 | Ni60.2Co8.2Al7.2Ti4Nb0.6Ta0.5Cr17.5Mo1W0.8 | [Al‒] | K418 | Ni68.7Fe1Al12.6Ti0.8Nb1.2Cr13.2Mo2.5 | [Al‒] | CM247LC | Ni67Co9Al12.4Ti0.9Ta1Cr6.8Mo0.3W2.6 | [Al‒] | IN939 | Ni48.2Co17.9Al4Ti4.4Nb0.6Cr24.4W0.5 | [Al‒] | RR1000 | Ni52.6Co17.8Al5.5Ti4.1Ta0.6Cr16.4Mo3 | [Al‒] | Waspaloy | Ni56.5Co13.3Al2.7Ti3.6Cr21.3Mo2.6 | [Al‒] | René 41 | Ni61.4Co10.8Al3.1Ti3.6Cr20.5Mo0.6 | [Al‒] | Haynes 282 | Ni55.6Co9.8Fe1.6Al3.2Ti2.5Cr22.2Mo5.1 | [Al‒] | IN718 | Ni52.3Fe19.3Al1.1Ti1.1Nb3.2Cr21.2Mo1.8 | [()‒] | IN625 | Ni64Fe2.7Al0.4Ti0.3Nb2.3Cr24.8Mo5.5 | [()‒] | Hastelloy-X | Ni48.3Co1.4Fe19.3Al0.5Cr24.7Mo5.5W0.3 | [()‒] |
|
Table 2. Composition and cluster formula analysis of nickel-based superalloys
[44,82,84-86]