Any object with a temperature higher than absolute zero will emit thermal radiation as stated in Planck’s law^[1]. According to the Stefan–Boltzmann law, the total thermal energy radiated from the surface of an object is proportional to the emissivity $\epsilon$ and the fourth power of the temperature. Thus, the infrared (IR) imaging can be controlled by either regulating the emissivity or changing the surface temperature. In nature, many organisms achieve better survival by adjusting their own IR radiation^[2–4]. Inspired by natural creatures, imitate biological regulation of surface heat radiation to achieve personal thermal management^[5,6], IR camouflage^[7,8], IR radiation cooling^[9,10], and other functions^[11–13] has received widespread attention.

IR imaging can be controlled by either regulating the emissivity or changing surface temperature, which is based on Stefan’s law. Extensive technologies on adjusting the thermal radiation have been reported so far, such as chemical coating, ultraviolet lithography^[14], and other methods^[15,16]. Zhu et al. completed the high-temperature IR camouflage, which is based on the combination of the ${\mathrm{SiO}}_2$ aerogel and the Ge/ZnS wavelength-selective emitter^[8]; Kirchhoff’s law, which exhibits the absorptivity equal to emissivity during thermo-dynamic equilibrium, played a vital role in the design of the micro/nanostructures to tailor the thermal radiation properties. Based on this consideration, Qu et al. designed the two kinds of spatially and spectrally resolved narrowband absorbers supported by 2D grating nanostructures and gold upon metallic film^[17]. Qi et al. reported a kind of photonic crystals (PCs) with very low IR emissivity to meet the target of IR stealth, acquired by constructing a one-dimensional PC (1DPC) structure of $\mathrm{Hs}{(\mathrm{Ge}/\mathrm{ZnS})}^3\mathrm{Ge}$^[18]. Nevertheless, these studies are almost reporting on methods of decreasing IR radiation, and there were few reports about improving IR radiation. Moreover, the above-mentioned fabrication procedures are complicated and challenging to operate. As a result, it is necessary to explore a simple and rapid way to increase IR radiation.

Herein, the femtosecond laser direct writing technology was applied to process micro-nano structured glass, the absorption of visible light and emissivity of IR light rise due to the production of the micro/nanostructures, and the size of nanocavities is about 200–500 nm. The laser-ablated (LT) glass exhibits lower transmittance of 16%–51%, accounting for the enhancement of scattering sunlight and higher absorption of 8%–16.4% at the visible wavelength than the untreated (UT) glass. In the IR wavelength range, it can also be observed that the emissivity of the LT glass is significantly increased, which leads to an improvement in the outward radiation heat. We experimentally demonstrate that higher IR image temperature appeared after processing, and the IR image of the LT glass is always closer to the actual environmental temperature than the UT sample wherever they were placed, which proved that the processed sample has better IR thermal imaging.

Femtosecond lasers can be used to fabricate micro/nanostructures, changing the properties of materials and opening up new applications^[19–29]. In this experiment, we employed a high-repetition commercial femtosecond laser system (PHAROS, LIGHT CONVERSION, Lithuania) with the frequency, central wavelength, and pulse width of 75 kHz, 1030 nm, and 250 fs, respectively. The laser beam was guided onto the substrate surface through a two-mirror galvanometric scanner (intelliSCAN III 14, SCANLAB, Germany) with an FTheta lens ($f=100\mathrm{mm}$). Laser power, scanning line speed, and scanning line spacing were controlled as 6 W, 0.2 m/s, and 10 µm, respectively. A $20\mathrm{mm}\times 20\mathrm{mm}$ glass (purchased from Guluo Quartz Glass Company, Luoyang) of 1 mm thickness is fixed to a processing stage. The rough surface of the glass was then fabricated by the line-by-line femtosecond laser scanning process.

The three-dimensional (3D) morphology and cross-section height were characterized by laser confocal microscopy (LCM, Axio LSM700, Zeiss, Germany). The micro/nanostructures of the treated surface were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, MIRA3 LMU, TESCAN, Czech Republic), and the analysis of elemental composition and elemental maps was carried out by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS, TESCAN, Czech Republic). Absorption and transmittance spectra were recorded using an ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectrophotometer (UV-2600, Japan) with an integrating sphere. The IR emissivity and reflectance were acquired by a Fourier transform IR spectrometer (Nicolet, NEXUS 670). The temperature distribution was obtained by an IR camera (Ti450, Fluke, USA).

Figure 1(a) shows the schematic illustration of the process of the femtosecond laser ablating glass and the optical principle of the UT and LT glass. The optical performance of these two samples in the visible and IR wavelength ranges has depicted an as-prepared sample with a higher light reflectance, IR emissivity, and lower transmittance. The surface of the sample after laser ablation has changed from smooth to rough, and many randomly distributed nanocavities and nanowires were produced. SEM images further reveal that [Figs. 2(a)–2(c)] at a finer scale. On account of the generation of these micro/nanostructures, light is irradiated on the object’s surface, and more refraction and scattering will occur. Similarly, the 3D and cross-sectional profiles were tested by LCM to evaluate the influence of femtosecond laser ablation [Fig. 1(b)], and it discovered that the surface roughness was relatively uniform.

Figures 2(a)–2(c) show the SEM topography of the UT and LT surface. It is evident that the surface of the LT glass has become much rougher than the UT sample [Fig. 2(a)], and the surface roughness after machining is homogeneous [Fig. 2(b)]. After further magnification, it can be found that there are many nanowires and nanocavities uniformly and randomly distributed on the surface. Nanowires in some regions are sintered together, and this may be due to the higher temperature during the procedure. The diameters of the nanocavities are 200 to 500 nm, which scatter visible light strongly and make the LT glass opaque to human eyes. The sizes of the holes are also much smaller than the IR wavelength, so it is beneficial to enhance IR radiation^[8]. The characterized morphology and roughness are overall very consistent with the LCM images, further proving that the fabricated micro/nanostructures by our strategy are uniform. Femtosecond laser ablation of glass in the air may produce chemical reactions and lead to changes in the content of chemical elements^[30], so EDS was used to compare and analyze the elements on the surface of the LT and UT. EDS mapping presents the elements being evenly distributed after processing.

The rough surfaces constructed by diverse micro/nanostructures are totally opaque because of the extensive light scattering effect. When the LT sample is placed on a paper with patterns, the fuzzy patterns behind the sample can be observed [Fig. 3(a)]. On the contrary, the pattern is obviously exhibited when the sample is placed under the UT glass. Therefore, to compare the influence of the LT sample surface more accurately, we measured the absorptivity and transmittance of the samples, respectively [Fig. 3(a)]. In the wavelength range of 220–1400 nm, the transmittance of the UT glass is higher than that of the LT glass from 12% to 50%. The absorption value of UT samples is about 10% lower than that of the LT glass, which is calculated based on the relation $\alpha +\rho +\tau =1$ (where $\alpha$ is absorption, $\tau$ is transmission, and $\rho$ is reflection). Moreover, similar phenomena can be observed at IR wavelengths, where the emissivity increases are attributed to the existence of the special structures, which leads to the LT glass being able to absorb a large amount of light energy [Fig. 3(b)]. However, the trend of reflectance appears inverse, and the spectral reflectance of the LT glass is consistently lower than that of the UT sample at the wavelength of 2.5–25 µm.

IR images were recorded to show the capacity of the LT sample to achieve the improvement of thermal imaging at different conditions. The surface of the heater was partly covered with two pieces of insulating cotton, which were used to prevent the heater and the sample from contacting directly [Fig. 4(a)]. When the constant temperature was set at 150°C, the real-time thermal imaging was recorded by the IR camera every 30 s, and the time when the sample was put on the heater was considered as the initial time [Fig. 4(b)]. As shown in Fig. 4(c), for the UT and LT areas, the temperature rose quickly in the first 60 s and then stabilized after about 110 s. After stabilization, the temperature of the UT and LT areas was recorded as about 81.2°C and 72.6°C, respectively. During the whole procedure, the temperature of the LT glass surface is always higher than that of the UT surface, which is attributed to the higher emissivity of the LT region. The UT and the LT glasses, with entirely the same size of $2\mathrm{cm}\times 2\mathrm{cm}$, were placed on the hand, respectively [Fig. 4(d)]. The area covered with the LT glass becomes nearly invisible under the IR camera, as its surface temperature is too close to the hand, which is caused by the micro/nanostructures being induced during the processing. The temperature of the UT sample is lower by about 2° than the other. All of the data shown above illustrate that the glass ablated by the femtosecond laser can enhance IR imaging.

In summary, one-sided rough micro/nanostructures glass was fabricated through a one-step femtosecond laser direct writing technology. Due to the micro/nanostructures such as nanocavities (about 200–500 nm in diameter) and nanowires appearing on the surface, this leads to a lot of light energy confined to micro/nanostructures. Thus, the absorption and emissivity in the wavelength range of visible light and IR light rise. When the LT sample was directly placed on the object, the IR thermal image of the LT glass was more accurate than that of the UT sample. This work provides a new way to enhance thermal imaging.