• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 6, Issue 7, 756 (2018)
Peng Li1、3、*, Dongjing Wu1, Yi Zhang1, Sheng Liu1, Yu Li1、2, Shuxia Qi1, and Jianlin Zhao1、4、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1MOE Key Laboratory of Material Physics and Chemistry under Extraordinary Conditions, and Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Optical Information Technology, School of Science, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, China
  • 2Department of Public Education, Northwestern Polytechnical University Ming De College, Xi’an 710124, China
  • 3e-mail: pengli@nwpu.edu.cn
  • 4e-mail: jlzhao@nwpu.edu.cn
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.6.000756 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Peng Li, Dongjing Wu, Yi Zhang, Sheng Liu, Yu Li, Shuxia Qi, Jianlin Zhao. Polarization oscillating beams constructed by copropagating optical frozen waves[J]. Photonics Research, 2018, 6(7): 756 Copy Citation Text show less
    Illustration of constructing polarization oscillating beams. (a) Zeroth- and first-order frozen waves that have rectangular and sinusoidal intensity profiles, respectively. The dashed lines denote where the intensity lines come from. (b) Evolution of transverse SoP of a polarization oscillating beam constructed from two sinusoidal frozen waves with opposite spin states and initial phase difference φ0=−π/2. The red and blue lines schematically depict the real parts of two electric fields. (c) Hybrid Poincaré sphere and the SoP conversion trajectory corresponding to the evolution in (b).
    Fig. 1. Illustration of constructing polarization oscillating beams. (a) Zeroth- and first-order frozen waves that have rectangular and sinusoidal intensity profiles, respectively. The dashed lines denote where the intensity lines come from. (b) Evolution of transverse SoP of a polarization oscillating beam constructed from two sinusoidal frozen waves with opposite spin states and initial phase difference φ0=π/2. The red and blue lines schematically depict the real parts of two electric fields. (c) Hybrid Poincaré sphere and the SoP conversion trajectory corresponding to the evolution in (b).
    Experiment setup for constructing polarization oscillating beams. SLM, spatial light modulator; BS, beam splitter; BT, beam terminal; L, lens; F, filter; QWP, quarter-wave plate; G, grating; CCD, charge-coupled device. Insets: (a) computer-generated hologram encoded on SLM; (b) intensity pattern of a first-order frozen wave at a certain location.
    Fig. 2. Experiment setup for constructing polarization oscillating beams. SLM, spatial light modulator; BS, beam splitter; BT, beam terminal; L, lens; F, filter; QWP, quarter-wave plate; G, grating; CCD, charge-coupled device. Insets: (a) computer-generated hologram encoded on SLM; (b) intensity pattern of a first-order frozen wave at a certain location.
    Intensities of constituent zeroth-order frozen waves and transverse SoP distributions of the resultant field at different propagation distances, respectively. The red and cyan ellipses in the bottom diagrams denote the local polarization ellipticity calculated from the measured Stokes parameters [11].
    Fig. 3. Intensities of constituent zeroth-order frozen waves and transverse SoP distributions of the resultant field at different propagation distances, respectively. The red and cyan ellipses in the bottom diagrams denote the local polarization ellipticity calculated from the measured Stokes parameters [11].
    (a) Longitudinal intensity distributions of two first-order frozen waves (denoted as red dots and black squares) with sinusoidal profiles. Dots, experiment result; curves, analyzed results. (b) Lateral intensity patterns of the synthesized field in equally spaced planes.
    Fig. 4. (a) Longitudinal intensity distributions of two first-order frozen waves (denoted as red dots and black squares) with sinusoidal profiles. Dots, experiment result; curves, analyzed results. (b) Lateral intensity patterns of the synthesized field in equally spaced planes.
    (a), (b) SoP distributions of the |D−1,1⟩ and |A−1,1⟩ states. (c)–(f) Experimentally measured SoP distributions at two adjacent nodes and antinodes. Left, polarization orientation (background) and polarization ellipticity distributions; right, S3 distributions. Black line and ellipse depict the linear and ellipse polarizations, respectively.
    Fig. 5. (a), (b) SoP distributions of the |D1,1 and |A1,1 states. (c)–(f) Experimentally measured SoP distributions at two adjacent nodes and antinodes. Left, polarization orientation (background) and polarization ellipticity distributions; right, S3 distributions. Black line and ellipse depict the linear and ellipse polarizations, respectively.
    (a) Intensity pattern of the second-order field at the z=0 plane. (b)–(e) Polarization orientation (upper) and intensity (bottom) distributions in four adjacent nodal planes. Arrows, the orientation of linear polarizer; dashed square, bound of selected areas corresponding to (b)–(e).
    Fig. 6. (a) Intensity pattern of the second-order field at the z=0 plane. (b)–(e) Polarization orientation (upper) and intensity (bottom) distributions in four adjacent nodal planes. Arrows, the orientation of linear polarizer; dashed square, bound of selected areas corresponding to (b)–(e).
    (a) Intensity distribution of fifth-order field at the z=0 plane; (b)–(d) zoom-in vertical component distributions at three adjacent nodal planes.
    Fig. 7. (a) Intensity distribution of fifth-order field at the z=0 plane; (b)–(d) zoom-in vertical component distributions at three adjacent nodal planes.
    Peng Li, Dongjing Wu, Yi Zhang, Sheng Liu, Yu Li, Shuxia Qi, Jianlin Zhao. Polarization oscillating beams constructed by copropagating optical frozen waves[J]. Photonics Research, 2018, 6(7): 756
    Download Citation