• Advanced Photonics Nexus
  • Vol. 2, Issue 4, 046004 (2023)
Yunhe Ma, Meng Xiang*, Wenzhuo Cheng, Ruitao Wu, Peijian Zhou, Gai Zhou, Jilong Li, Jianping Li, Songnian Fu, and Yuwen Qin
Author Affiliations
  • Guangdong University of Technology, Department of Information Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Photonics Information Technology, Guangzhou, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1117/1.APN.2.4.046004 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yunhe Ma, Meng Xiang, Wenzhuo Cheng, Ruitao Wu, Peijian Zhou, Gai Zhou, Jilong Li, Jianping Li, Songnian Fu, Yuwen Qin. Digital subcarrier multiplexing-enabled carrier-free phase-retrieval receiver[J]. Advanced Photonics Nexus, 2023, 2(4): 046004 Copy Citation Text show less
    Generation of DSM signals at Tx.
    Fig. 1. Generation of DSM signals at Tx.
    Simulation setup and corresponding DSP stack.
    Fig. 2. Simulation setup and corresponding DSP stack.
    Simulated BER with respect to the dispersion of dispersion element used when the modulation format is (a) QPSK, (b) 16QAM, and (c) 32QAM.
    Fig. 3. Simulated BER with respect to the dispersion of dispersion element used when the modulation format is (a) QPSK, (b) 16QAM, and (c) 32QAM.
    Simulated BER with respect to the OSNR of received signals when the modulation format is (a) QPSK; (b) 16QAM; (c) 32QAM.
    Fig. 4. Simulated BER with respect to the OSNR of received signals when the modulation format is (a) QPSK; (b) 16QAM; (c) 32QAM.
    Simulated BER as a function of iteration when the modulation format is (a) QPSK; (b) 16QAM; (c) 32QAM.
    Fig. 5. Simulated BER as a function of iteration when the modulation format is (a) QPSK; (b) 16QAM; (c) 32QAM.
    Simulated tolerance toward the laser linewidth when the modulation format is (a) QPSK; (b) 16QAM; (c) 32QAM.
    Fig. 6. Simulated tolerance toward the laser linewidth when the modulation format is (a) QPSK; (b) 16QAM; (c) 32QAM.
    Simulated tolerance toward the wavelength drift when the modulation format is (a) QPSK; (b) 16QAM; (c) 32QAM.
    Fig. 7. Simulated tolerance toward the wavelength drift when the modulation format is (a) QPSK; (b) 16QAM; (c) 32QAM.
    Simulated tolerance toward the receiver skew when the modulation format is (a) QPSK; (b) 16QAM; (c) 32QAM.
    Fig. 8. Simulated tolerance toward the receiver skew when the modulation format is (a) QPSK; (b) 16QAM; (c) 32QAM.
    Simulated tolerance toward the amplitude imbalance when the modulation format is (a) QPSK; (b) 16QAM; (c) 32QAM.
    Fig. 9. Simulated tolerance toward the amplitude imbalance when the modulation format is (a) QPSK; (b) 16QAM; (c) 32QAM.
    Implementation complexity comparison, in terms of (a) number of adders and (b) number of multiplications.
    Fig. 10. Implementation complexity comparison, in terms of (a) number of adders and (b) number of multiplications.
    Experimental setup of 25 GBaud 16QAM fiber optical transmission.
    Fig. 11. Experimental setup of 25 GBaud 16QAM fiber optical transmission.
    Achieved BER as a function of (a) number of iterations and (b) OSNR.
    Fig. 12. Achieved BER as a function of (a) number of iterations and (b) OSNR.
    Achieved BER as a function of (a) laser linewidth, and (b) receiver skew.
    Fig. 13. Achieved BER as a function of (a) laser linewidth, and (b) receiver skew.
    Function a(t),b(t),R,V,hCD,hD,Imax
    1. s^(t)=rand(t)   ⋄ Initialize phase
    2. Forifrom 1 toImax
    3. a(t)a(t)P, b(t)b(t)P; where P=(R1)·exp(i/V)+1   ⋄ AIT
    4. s^(t)=a(t)exp(js^(t))   ⋄ Reconstruct the field
    5. s^(t)hCD1(t)s^(t)   ⋄ Propagate back to Tx
    6. s^k(t)s^(t)   ⋄ Subcarrier demultiplexing
    7. s^k(t)hRRC(t)s^k(t)   ⋄ RRC shaping
    8. s^k(t)s^k(t)   ⋄ Downsample to one Sps
    9. s^k(tp)|sp(tp)|exp[jsp(tp)]   ⋄ Pilot constraint
    10. s^k(t)s^k(t)   ⋄ Upsample to two Sps
    11. s^k(t)hRRC(t)s^k(t)   ⋄ RRC shaping
    12. s^(t)s^k(t)   ⋄ Subcarrier multiplexing
    13. s^(t)hCD(t)hD(t)s^(t)   ⋄ To projection plane
    14. s^(t)b(t)exp[js^(t)]   ⋄ Intensity update
    15. s^(t)hD1(t)s^(t)   ⋄ Propagate back to Rx
    16. Returnsexp[js^(t)]
    Table 1. PR_AIT algorithm for DSM signals.
    Yunhe Ma, Meng Xiang, Wenzhuo Cheng, Ruitao Wu, Peijian Zhou, Gai Zhou, Jilong Li, Jianping Li, Songnian Fu, Yuwen Qin. Digital subcarrier multiplexing-enabled carrier-free phase-retrieval receiver[J]. Advanced Photonics Nexus, 2023, 2(4): 046004
    Download Citation