• NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES
  • Vol. 47, Issue 1, 010001 (2024)
Manchen HUANG1, Fei HAN1,*, Ping XIAO2, Mengqi LI1, and Feng GAO3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Yunnan Key Laboratory of Earth System Science, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
  • 2College of Teacher Education, Yuxi Normal University, Yuxi 653100, China
  • 3Yunnan Institute of Cultural Relics & Archaeology, Kunming 650500, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2024.hjs.47.010001 Cite this Article
    Manchen HUANG, Fei HAN, Ping XIAO, Mengqi LI, Feng GAO. Establishing the standardised growth curves of Late Pleistocene fossil teeth for electron spin resonance dating[J]. NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, 2024, 47(1): 010001 Copy Citation Text show less
    ESR signal spectrogram of tooth enamel
    Fig. 1. ESR signal spectrogram of tooth enamel
    Dose response curves of fossil samples from the Late Pleistocene site Jinhong Naminan(a) Schematic of the dose response, (b) Correlation diagram between D0and Im
    Fig. 2. Dose response curves of fossil samples from the Late Pleistocene site Jinhong Naminan(a) Schematic of the dose response, (b) Correlation diagram between D0and Im
    Linear and exponential correlations between the ESR signal intensities of the fossil samples and DE values (color online)
    Fig. 3. Linear and exponential correlations between the ESR signal intensities of the fossil samples and DE values (color online)
    Comparison of DE values obtained usingthe ADM and linear (triangles) and exponential SGCs (dots)
    Fig. 4. Comparison of DE values obtained usingthe ADM and linear (triangles) and exponential SGCs (dots)
    SGC obtained using the average method for Late Pleistocene enamel samples
    Fig. 5. SGC obtained using the average method for Late Pleistocene enamel samples
    Comparison of DE values obtained using the ADM andSGC produced by the average method
    Fig. 6. Comparison of DE values obtained using the ADM andSGC produced by the average method
    Photographs of the NMN13-2 sample used to produce the SGC using the representative sample method (a) Occlusal surface, (b) Lingual surface, (c) Labial surface
    Fig. 7. Photographs of the NMN13-2 sample used to produce the SGC using the representative sample method (a) Occlusal surface, (b) Lingual surface, (c) Labial surface
    Dose response curve of the standard sample NMN13-2
    Fig. 8. Dose response curve of the standard sample NMN13-2
    Comparison of DE values obtained using the ADMand SGC produced by the representative sample method
    Fig. 9. Comparison of DE values obtained using the ADMand SGC produced by the representative sample method

    遗址编号

    Number

    遗址名称

    Sites

    遗址时代

    Period

    化石样品数量

    Number of fossil samples

    参考文献

    Reference

    1景洪娜咪囡Naminan晚更新世Upper Pleistocene11未发表Unpublished
    2农克硝洞Xiaodong晚更新世Upper Pleistocene9未发表Unpublished
    3临沧大岩脚洞Dayanjiaodong中更新世Middle Pleistocene1未发表Unpublished
    4开远架吉Jiaji中更新世Middle Pleistocene1未发表Unpublished
    5江川甘棠菁Gantangqing中更新世Middle Pleistocene1未发表Unpublished
    6郧县梅铺Meipu中更新世Middle Pleistocene3[14]
    7沂源骑子鞍山Anshan中更新世Middle Pleistocene3[15]
    8阳原后沟Hougou中更新世Middle Pleistocene2[16]
    9张家口尚义Shangyi中更新世Middle Pleistocene1未发表Unpublished
    Table 1. Locality information of the fossil samples used to establish the SGCs in this study

    样品编号

    Sample No.

    ADM-DE/ Gy误差Error / GyYork线性方程York fitting指数方程Exponential fitting
    SGC-DE*/ Gy误差Error / Gy偏差Discrepancy / %SGC-DE*/ Gy误差Error / Gy偏差Discrepancy / %
    NKXD-135.702.8733.371.36-6.530.671.86-14.1
    NKXD-230.003.0034.781.2615.931.881.856.3
    NKXD-319.451.1226.661.4337.124.941.2228.2
    NKXD-741.791.1960.433.1544.653.913.6529.0
    NKXD-833.822.4433.900.350.231.131.41-8.0
    NKXD-927.800.6938.322.1137.834.912.6325.6
    NKXD-1241.361.2661.174.9347.954.543.0231.9
    NKXD-1342.681.9551.982.9421.846.633.429.3
    NKXD-1545.562.0355.573.5622.049.722.839.1
    Table 2. Comparison of DEvalues obtained using the ADM and linear and exponential SGCs

    样品编号

    Sample No.

    ADM-DE

    / Gy

    误差

    Error / Gy

    平均法SGC-DE*Average method SGC-DE* / Gy

    误差

    Error / Gy

    偏差

    Discrepancy / %

    NKXD-135.702.8730.470.88-14.6
    NKXD-230.003.0031.670.785.6
    NKXD-319.451.1224.771.1327.4
    NKXD-741.791.1953.571.1628.2
    NKXD-833.822.4430.931.12-8.5
    NKXD-927.800.6934.691.2024.8
    NKXD-1241.361.2654.201.8031.0
    NKXD-1342.681.9546.341.258.6
    NKXD-1545.562.0349.411.438.5
    Table 3. Comparison of DE values obtained using the ADM and SGC produced by the average method

    样品编号

    Sample No.

    ADM-DE

    / Gy

    误差

    Error / Gy

    代表样品法SGC-DE*Representative method SGC-DE* / Gy

    误差

    Error / Gy

    偏差

    Discrepancy / %

    NMN13-118.460.9614.550.58-21.2
    NMN13-317.490.8814.770.52-15.6
    NMN13-419.231.0319.240.530.1
    NMN13-518.081.5218.070.49-0.1
    NMN13-617.410.8019.300.6810.9
    NMN97-111.970.4810.090.39-15.7
    NMN97-213.820.4812.980.61-6.1
    NMN97-313.370.5612.580.79-5.9
    NMN97-417.950.6013.350.46-25.6
    NMN97-515.610.3813.730.67-12.0
    Table 4. Comparison of DE values obtained using the ADM and SGC produced by the representative sample method
    Manchen HUANG, Fei HAN, Ping XIAO, Mengqi LI, Feng GAO. Establishing the standardised growth curves of Late Pleistocene fossil teeth for electron spin resonance dating[J]. NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, 2024, 47(1): 010001
    Download Citation