
Search by keywords or author
- Journal of Electronic Science and Technology
- Vol. 22, Issue 3, 100276 (2024)

Fig. 1. 254-element array layout synthesized by the MI-FFT technique (blue Ρ denotes turned ON element).
![Thinned array pattern obtained by the MI-FFT technique [22]: (a) 3D pattern in (u, v)-plane and (b) two orthogonal cuts of the pattern.](/richHtml/JEST/2024/22/3/100276/img_2.jpg)
Fig. 2. Thinned array pattern obtained by the MI-FFT technique [22]: (a) 3D pattern in (u , v )-plane and (b) two orthogonal cuts of the pattern.

Fig. 3. Results obtained by different methods in a nonuniformly spaced array with length L = 14.5λ : (a) Synthesized patterns and (b) Corresponding excitations.

Fig. 4. Results obtained by different methods in a clustered array (N = 128, d = 0.5λ ): (a) Synthesized patterns and (b) half of corresponding excitations.
|
Table 1. SLLs obtained by different methods for different size square arrays.
|
Table 2. Results of nonuniformly spaced arrays optimized by representative methods (d min is the realized minimum element spacing, and P denotes the number of optimized elements).
|
Table 3. Results of clustered array optimized by representative methods (Q is the number of subarrays, and N min denotes the realized minimum number of elements in each subarray).

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address