• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 23, Issue 5, 051303 (2025)
Yang Feng1,2, Yilang Hu1,2, Yanmei Li1,2, Di Zhang5..., Zhanshi Yao4, Jingdong Luo5, Feng He1,2, Jianan Duan1,2, Yong Yao1,2, Lei Wang3 and Xiaochuan Xu1,2,3,*|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1National Key Laboratory of Laser Spatial Information, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
  • 2Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Integrated Photonic-Electronic Chip, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Aerospace Communication and Networking Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China
  • 3National Peng Cheng Laboratory (PCL), Shenzhen 518000, China
  • 4Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518129, China
  • 5Department of Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL202523.051303 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yang Feng, Yilang Hu, Yanmei Li, Di Zhang, Zhanshi Yao, Jingdong Luo, Feng He, Jianan Duan, Yong Yao, Lei Wang, Xiaochuan Xu, "Demonstration of ultrathin film silicon-organic hybrid modulator with long-term stability in a damp heat environment," Chin. Opt. Lett. 23, 051303 (2025) Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Silicon-organic hybrid (SOH) modulators have garnered sustained interest due to their superior performance, with low driving voltage and compact footprint. However, concerns regarding their reliability have greatly hindered their widespread deployment. Recent progress in molecular synthesis significantly improves the thermal stability of SOH modulators. However, the reliability of the damp heat aging test has not been reported. In this paper, we report on a thin-film SOH modulator with a half-wave voltage–length product (VπL) of 1.18 V·cm. The device’s frequency response extends beyond 33 GHz without degradation. After exposure to 85°C and 85% relative humidity for 1000 h without packaging, the electro-optic response of the modulator degrades by only 7.3%. This demonstration may help resolve doubts regarding the durability of SOH modulators.

    1. Introduction

    With the explosive growth in global data traffic driven by bandwidth-hungry applications such as artificial intelligence and cloud computing[14], the demand for large bandwidth and power-efficient electro-optic (EO) modulators remains relentless. EO polymers have long been considered as a paradigm-shifting material due to the high EO coefficient, fast response, and low dispersion[39]. Silicon-organic hybrid (SOH) modulators, which combine the advantages of both organic and inorganic materials, have demonstrated impressive performance, with low driving voltage and compact size[1015]. To enhance the interaction between the optical field, electric field, and the EO polymer, slot waveguide is a prevalent solution[1621]. It provides significantly larger optical confinement compared to conventional waveguides, e.g.,  strip waveguides. However, the narrow and deep slot is susceptible to fabrication errors, which complicates the infiltration and poling of the polymer.

    Thin-film silicon waveguides offer a competitive alternative[2225]. With a waveguide core thickness less than one-third of the conventional thickness commonly used in commercial foundries (e.g.,  220 nm), the modes in thin-film waveguides extend significantly into the cladding, achieving confinement factors even higher than slot waveguides. In the meantime, the interaction between guided modes and rough sidewalls is substantially reduced, leading to a significantly lower propagation loss in thin-film SOH waveguides compared to slot waveguides[23]. A recent demonstration of a thin-film silicon Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI) modulator achieved a VπL of 1.4 V·cm and a 70 GHz bandwidth using 40 nm-thick silicon waveguides[24]. Instead of the widely adopted transverse electric (TE) modes, the modulator operates with the fundamental transverse magnetic (TM) mode, which requires a vertical electric field for polling the EO polymer and driving the modulator. Although the smooth electrode surface formed by deposition could increase the poling efficiency, the vertical electrode configuration is incompatible with the current silicon-on-insulator (SOI)-based silicon photonics integration process. An attempt to use the conventional fundamental TE mode achieved a VπL of 1.9 V·cm on SOI with a 50 nm-thick single-crystal silicon[25]. However, the resistivity of the EO polymer in the work is relatively small. Thus, side cladding with suitable resistivity was required to enhance mode confinement and form an electric field with adequate intensity for effective poling.

    In this study, we experimentally demonstrate a TE thin-film SOH modulator on SOI with 70 nm-thick single-crystal silicon cores. This thickness is compatible with the standard silicon fabrication process in commercial foundries and can be integrated with other silicon photonic devices. Benefiting from the high-volume resistivity of the EO polymer SEO100[26], high poling efficiency can be achieved without side claddings, which simplifies the device design and fabrication. The device shows a bandwidth over 33 GHz, which is limited by the bandwidth of the testing equipment. The stability of the unpackaged modulator is experimentally verified in a long-term damp heat environment.

    2. Modulator Design and Fabrication

    Figure 1(a) illustrates the structure of the thin-film SOH EO modulator. The modulator employs the classic asymmetric MZI configuration with a 45 µm length difference between the two arms. The coplanar ground–signal–ground (GSG) traveling wave electrode of 600 nm thick is leveraged for poling and modulation. The single-crystal silicon core layer is 70 nm thick. The inset in Fig. 1(a) shows the field distribution of a typical fundamental TE mode along with the cross-section of the thin-film waveguide. The refractive index of the EO polymer is set as 1.70 to emulate the SEO100 polymer. Figure 1(b) shows the molecular structure of SEO100, which is composed of the chromophore molecule AJLZ53 and the host polymer amorphous polycarbonate (APC)[8]. AJLZ53 chromophore is a highly efficient and photochemically stable dipolar nonlinear optical chromophore developed based on the perturbational molecular orbital theory of Dewar’s rule. It can be doped into APC at a relatively high loading level. The polymer composite shows a high-volume resistivity of 1.3×109Ω·m at a glass transition temperature (Tg) around 140°C and exhibits an exceptional combination of large EO coefficients, good thermal stability, and low optical loss[9]. Notably, a significant portion of the optical field extends outside the waveguide, which enhances the effective integration of the EO polymer onto SOI. The width of the thin-silicon waveguide is simulated to ensure the lossless propagation of a single fundamental TE mode. Figure 1(c) depicts the field interaction factors of thin-silicon waveguides as a function of waveguide width. For comparison, the dashed line in the same figure shows the interaction factor of a 70 nm wide slot waveguide for comparison[16,20]. Although a narrower waveguide can yield a higher interaction factor, the electrodes must be put farther apart to avoid the absorption loss induced by metals. Figure 1(d) shows the variation of optical loss as a function of waveguide width and the gap between the core and electrode. Considering the trade-off between optical loss and modulation efficiency, the gap and waveguide width are selected to be 1.2 and 1.1 µm, respectively, corresponding to a field interaction factor (Γ) of 43.5 % according to the definition of Γ in Ref. [27]. The 50 ohmic GSG electrodes are designed accordingly. Figure 1(d) also shows that a narrower gap can further improve the modulation efficiency without increasing the propagation loss of the waveguide. However, considering the misalignment of the in-house fabrication, a more conservative gap value is used.

    EO polymer modulator. (a) Schematic of the thin-film SOH EO modulator. The inset is TE0 mode distribution. (b) Molecular structures of chromophore AJLZ53 and host polymer amorphous polycarbonate. (c) The field interaction factor as a function of waveguide width. (d) The absorption loss of the thin-film waveguide as a function of the gap among the metal electrode, the waveguide core, and the waveguide width.

    Figure 1.EO polymer modulator. (a) Schematic of the thin-film SOH EO modulator. The inset is TE0 mode distribution. (b) Molecular structures of chromophore AJLZ53 and host polymer amorphous polycarbonate. (c) The field interaction factor as a function of waveguide width. (d) The absorption loss of the thin-film waveguide as a function of the gap among the metal electrode, the waveguide core, and the waveguide width.

    The primary fabrication steps of the modulator are summarized in Fig. 2(a), with optical microscopy images of the device after dry etching, lift-off, spin casting of the EO polymer, and poling shown in the inset. The patterning of the thin-film silicon waveguide is accomplished using electron-beam lithography (EBL, nb5, Nanobeam) and inductively coupled plasma (ICP) etching (GSE200Plus). The traveling wave electrodes are formed through a conventional lift-off process. The EO polymer with a weight ratio of 35% (mass fraction) is spin-coated on the device, forming a 1.5 µm thick film, and is subsequently dried at 85°C in a vacuum oven overnight to remove the residual solvent. The EO polymer is polled at 120°C by applying a voltage of 350 V across the two ground electrodes, corresponding to a poling electric field of 100 V/µm[28]. Figure 2(b) shows the poling voltage (black), leakage current (red), and poling temperature (blue) curves collected from the modulator poling process. Once the poling voltage of 350 V is reached, the temperature of the hot plate starts to increase until it reaches 120°C. The temperature is kept slightly lower than the Tg to avoid breakdown. As soon as the temperature reaches 120°C, the hot plate is switched off while the poling voltage is kept at 350 V. Finally, the poling voltage is turned off when the temperature reaches room temperature. Figure 2(c) shows the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the fabricated waveguide, along with a cross-sectional view of the waveguide. After applying the EO polymer, the insertion loss of the modulator with a 0.5 mm phase shifter is measured to be approximately 4.2 dB, which consists of 0.2 dB from the phase shifters and 4 dB loss from passive waveguide components, including two multimode interferometers (MMIs) and the routing waveguide. The phase shifter sections contribute to an estimated propagation loss of 0.4 dB/mm.

    Fabrication of EO polymer modulator. (a) Fabrication process of the thin-film SOH EO modulator. (b) Poling curve of the modulator. The black, red, and blue lines represent poling voltage, leakage current, and poling temperature, respectively. (c) SEM image of the thin-film waveguide.

    Figure 2.Fabrication of EO polymer modulator. (a) Fabrication process of the thin-film SOH EO modulator. (b) Poling curve of the modulator. The black, red, and blue lines represent poling voltage, leakage current, and poling temperature, respectively. (c) SEM image of the thin-film waveguide.

    3. Bandwidth and Reliability Characteristics

    The frequency response of the modulator is characterized by the setup shown in Fig. 3(a). The radio frequency (RF) electrical signal from port 1 of the vector network analyzers (VNAs) is applied to the high-frequency electrode of the modulator through a high-frequency probe. A tunable laser operating at 1550 nm provides the input light, which is adjusted to the TE mode using a polarization controller before being launched into the device under test. The modulated output light is amplified using an erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA).

    (a) Testing setup for the EO frequency response of the modulator, including electrical connections (red) and optical paths (black) using single-mode fibers. PC, polarization controller; EDFA, erbium-doped fiber amplifier; BPF, bandpass filter; PD, photodetector. (b) Transmission spectra of the device before and after poling. (c) Transmission spectra of thin-film SOH EO modulator under different DC voltages. (d) Wavelength shifts in relation to the applied voltage. (e) Measured EO transmission S21 for devices (1 mm).

    Figure 3.(a) Testing setup for the EO frequency response of the modulator, including electrical connections (red) and optical paths (black) using single-mode fibers. PC, polarization controller; EDFA, erbium-doped fiber amplifier; BPF, bandpass filter; PD, photodetector. (b) Transmission spectra of the device before and after poling. (c) Transmission spectra of thin-film SOH EO modulator under different DC voltages. (d) Wavelength shifts in relation to the applied voltage. (e) Measured EO transmission S21 for devices (1 mm).

    After amplification, the modulated light is filtered and detected using a high-speed photodetector. The optical signal is converted into a high-frequency electrical signal and measured at port S2 of the VNA. To minimize the drive voltage, a 1 mm-long device is used for the measurement. Figure 2(b) shows the transmission spectra of the device before and after poling. The static extinction ratio of the modulator exceeds 30 dB. The shift of the interference spectrum is attributed to the change of the refractive index of the EO polymer during the poling, indicating that the alignment of the EO polymer occurs.

    To determine the modulation efficiency, the half-wave voltage (Vπ) of the modulator is measured by applying different DC voltages between the ground and signal electrodes. Figure 3(c) shows the transmission spectra of the thin-film SOH modulator under varying applied voltages. The free spectral region (ΔλFSR) is 18.3 nm. The EO response of the modulator, R=Δλ/ΔV, is measured to be 387.1 pm/V, which is obtained by tracing and linearly fitting the shift of the minimum in the spectra under different DC voltages. According to the equation Vπ=(ΔλFSR)/(2R)[29], Vπ is calculated to be 23.6 V, leading to a VπL of 1.18 V·cm, which is approximately half of the value of thin-film lithium niobate modulators[30]. The effective EO coefficient of the EO polymer is 215.1 pm/V. As shown in Fig. 3(e), the measured EO S21 does not degrade within the bandwidth of the measurement setup. The 3 dB bandwidth of the modulator is much larger than 33 GHz, which is limited by the bandwidth of the equipment we have access to.

    The EO polymer used in this demonstration has been proven to be able to retain >90% of its original r33 value (169 pm/V at 1310 nm by simple reflection technique) after being annealed at 85°C for 500 h[31]. Previously, Koos et al. demonstrated the first high-speed operation of an SOH modulator with SEO100 polymer at an elevated temperature of 80°C in a regular oxygen-rich ambient atmosphere[32]. Thus, in this work, we mainly concentrate on demonstrating long-term stability in a damp heat environment. Figure 4 illustrates the variation of the EO response over time when the device is kept under storage conditions of 85°C and 85% relative humidity (RH) for 1000 h without protective packaging. The EO responses of the device at 0, 240, 456, 768, and 1000 h are measured. The EO response only decreases by 7.3 % after 1000 h in the 85°C and 85% RH environment.

    Variations in EO response within the device over time.

    Figure 4.Variations in EO response within the device over time.

    4. Conclusion

    In this paper, we experimentally demonstrated a thin-film SOH EO modulator on SOI with a 70 nm silicon layer. The measured half-wave-voltage length product is 1.18 V·cm. The frequency response of the modulator extends beyond 33 GHz without significant degradation. Furthermore, the long-term stability of the modulator is confirmed after long-term (1000 h) exposure to an 85°C/85% RH storage environment without packaging. The EO activity and stability of SEO100 as a benchmark guest-host EO polymer can be further improved by chemical crosslinking and supramolecular engineering of organic EO materials. These results demonstrate that the SOH modulator can meet the thermal reliability requirements for optoelectronic components in future energy-efficient data centers and harsh environment applications.

    References

    [1] S. Shekhar, W. Bogaerts, L. Chrostowski et al. Roadmapping the next generation of silicon photonics. Nat. Commun., 15, 751(2024).

    [2] N. Quack, A. Y. Takabayashi, H. Sattari et al. Integrated silicon photonic MEMS. Microsyst. Nanoeng., 9, 27(2023).

    [3] M. Thomaschewski, S. I. Bozhevolnyi. Pockels modulation in integrated nanophotonics. Appl. Phys. Rev., 9, 021311(2022).

    [4] I. Taghavi, M. Moridsadat, A. Tofini et al. Polymer modulators in silicon photonics: review and projections. Nanophotonics, 11, 3855(2022).

    [5] Y. Wang, T. Liu, J. Liu et al. Organic electro-optic polymer materials and organic-based hybrid electro-optic modulators. J. Semicond., 43, 101301(2022).

    [6] W. Freude, A. Kotz, H. Kholeif et al. High-performance modulators employing organic electro-optic materials on the silicon platform. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 30, 1(2024).

    [7] H. Xu, F. Liu, D. L. Elder et al. Ultrahigh electro-optic coefficients, high index of refraction, and long-term stability from Diels–Alder cross-linkable binary molecular glasses. Chem. Mater., 32, 1408(2020).

    [8] J. Wu, Z. Li, J. Luo et al. High-performance organic second- and third-order nonlinear optical materials for ultrafast information processing. J. Mater. Chem. C, 8, 15009(2020).

    [9] S. Huang, J. Luo, Z. Jin et al. Enhanced temporal stability of a highly efficient guest–host electro-optic polymer through a barrier layer assisted poling process. J. Mater. Chem., 22, 20353(2012).

    [10] Z. Pan, X. Xu, C. Chung et al. High-speed modulator based on electro-optic polymer infiltrated subwavelength grating waveguide ring resonator. Laser Photonics Rev., 12, 1700300(2018).

    [11] J. Leuthold, C. Koos, W. Freude et al. Silicon-organic hybrid electro-optical devices. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 19, 114(2013).

    [12] L. Alloatti, R. Palmer, S. Diebold et al. 100 GHz silicon–organic hybrid modulator. Light Sci. Appl., 3, e173(2014).

    [13] R. Palmer, W. Freude, J. Leuthold et al. High-speed, low drive-voltage silicon-organic hybrid modulator based on a binary-chromophore electro-optic material. J. Light. Technol., 32, 2726(2014).

    [14] Y. Enami, C. T. DeRose, C. Loychik et al. Low half-wave voltage and high electro-optic effect in hybrid polymer/sol-gel waveguide modulators. Appl. Phys. Lett., 89, 143506(2006).

    [15] R. Ding, T. Baehr-Jones, Y. Liu et al. Demonstration of a low V_πL modulator with GHz bandwidth based on electro-optic polymer-clad silicon slot waveguides. Opt. Express, 18, 15618(2010).

    [16] S. Ummethala, J. N. Kemal, A. S. Alam et al. Hybrid electro-optic modulator combining silicon photonic slot waveguides with high-k radio-frequency slotlines. Optica, 8, 511(2021).

    [17] H. Zwickel, S. Singer, C. Kieninger et al. Verified equivalent-circuit model for slot-waveguide modulators. Opt. Express, 28, 12951(2020).

    [18] C. Kieninger, C. Füllner, H. Zwickel et al. Silicon-organic hybrid (SOH) Mach-Zehnder modulators for 100 GBd PAM4 signaling with sub-1 dB phase-shifter loss. Opt. Express, 28, 24693(2020).

    [19] R. Palmer, L. Alloatti, D. Korn et al. Low power Mach–Zehnder modulator in silicon-organic hybrid technology. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 25, 1226(2013).

    [20] W. Heni, C. Haffner, D. L. Elder et al. Nonlinearities of organic electro-optic materials in nanoscale slots and implications for the optimum modulator design. Opt. Express, 25, 2627(2017).

    [21] H. Sato, J. Mao, A. Bannaron et al. A 100 Gbaud on-off-keying silicon-polymer hybrid modulator operating at up to 110°C. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 33, 1507(2021).

    [22] H. Sato, H. Miura, F. Qiu et al. Low driving voltage Mach-Zehnder interference modulator constructed from an electro-optic polymer on ultra-thin silicon with a broadband operation. Opt. Express, 25, 768(2017).

    [23] F. Qiu, H. Sato, A. M. Spring et al. Ultra-thin silicon/electro-optic polymer hybrid waveguide modulators. Appl. Phys. Lett., 107, 123302(2015).

    [24] G.-W. Lu, J. Hong, F. Qiu et al. High-temperature-resistant silicon-polymer hybrid modulator operating at up to 200 Gbit s−1 for energy-efficient datacentres and harsh-environment applications. Nat. Commun., 11, 4224(2020).

    [25] J. Mao, H. Sato, A. Bannaron et al. Efficient silicon and side-cladding waveguide modulator with electro-optic polymer. Opt. Express, 30, 1885(2022).

    [26] Y. Enami, Y. Jouane, J. Luo et al. Enhanced conductivity of sol-gel silica cladding for efficient poling in electro-optic polymer/TiO_2 vertical slot waveguide modulators. Opt. Express, 22, 30191(2014).

    [27] C. Koos, J. Leuthold, W. Freude et al. Silicon-organic hybrid (SOH) and plasmonic-organic hybrid (POH) integration. J. Light. Technol., 34, 256(2016).

    [28] M. Maurer, E. Gawron, C. Middlebrook. Progressive poling of large area, High r33 electro-optic polymer SEO100c. Appl. Sci., 11, 8108(2021).

    [29] T. Sutili, E. Conforti. Optical modulator half-wave voltage measurement using opposite-phase sine waves. J. Light. Technol., 34, 2152(2016).

    [30] M. He, M. Xu, Y. Ren et al. High-performance hybrid silicon and lithium niobate Mach–Zehnder modulators for 100 Gbit s−1 and beyond. Nat. Photonics, 13, 359(2019).

    [31] S. Huang, J. Luo, Z. Jin et al. Enhanced temporal stability of a highly efficient guest–host electro-optic polymer through a barrier layer assisted poling process. J. Mater. Chem., 22, 20353(2012).

    [32] M. Lauermann, S. Wolf, W. Hartmann et al. Generation of 64 GBd 4ASK signals using a silicon-organic hybrid modulator at 80°C. Opt. Express, 24, 9389(2016).

    Yang Feng, Yilang Hu, Yanmei Li, Di Zhang, Zhanshi Yao, Jingdong Luo, Feng He, Jianan Duan, Yong Yao, Lei Wang, Xiaochuan Xu, "Demonstration of ultrathin film silicon-organic hybrid modulator with long-term stability in a damp heat environment," Chin. Opt. Lett. 23, 051303 (2025)
    Download Citation