• Matter and Radiation at Extremes
  • Vol. 8, Issue 2, 025903 (2023)
Liang Hao, Jie Qiu, and Wen Yi Huoa)
Author Affiliations
  • Laboratory of Computational Physics, Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100094, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1063/5.0123585 Cite this Article
    Liang Hao, Jie Qiu, Wen Yi Huo. Generation of high intensity speckles in overlapping laser beams[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2023, 8(2): 025903 Copy Citation Text show less
    (a)–(d) Normalized absolute amplitude of the vector potential on different slices in the x̂–ŷ plane at z = 0λc, 170λc, 340λc, and 512λc for beams 1 [(a) and (c)] and 2 [(b) and (d)] in cases I [(a) and (b)] and II [(c) and (d)]. (e) and (f) Normalized absolute amplitude of the vector potential on a slice in the ŷ–ẑ plane at x = 185λc for beam 2 in cases I and II, respectively.
    Fig. 1. (a)–(d) Normalized absolute amplitude of the vector potential on different slices in the x̂ŷ plane at z = 0λc, 170λc, 340λc, and 512λc for beams 1 [(a) and (c)] and 2 [(b) and (d)] in cases I [(a) and (b)] and II [(c) and (d)]. (e) and (f) Normalized absolute amplitude of the vector potential on a slice in the ŷẑ plane at x = 185λc for beam 2 in cases I and II, respectively.
    (a) and (b) FOPAI of beams 1 and 2, respectively, diagnosed in the outgoing x̂–ŷ plane in the different cases listed in Table I. Solid and dashed lines denote the polarization components in the x and y directions, respectively.
    Fig. 2. (a) and (b) FOPAI of beams 1 and 2, respectively, diagnosed in the outgoing x̂ŷ plane in the different cases listed in Table I. Solid and dashed lines denote the polarization components in the x and y directions, respectively.
    Real and imaginary parts (orange and blue lines, respectively) of the plasma coupling coefficient K vs the wavelength separation between two beams when the plasma flow velocity is zero.
    Fig. 3. Real and imaginary parts (orange and blue lines, respectively) of the plasma coupling coefficient K vs the wavelength separation between two beams when the plasma flow velocity is zero.
    Normalized absolute amplitude of the x [(a) and (b)] and y [(c) and (d)] polarization components of the vector potential on different slices in the x̂–ŷ plane at z = 0λc, 170λc, 340λc, and 512λc for beams 1 [(a) and (c)] and 2 [(b) and (d)] in case III.
    Fig. 4. Normalized absolute amplitude of the x [(a) and (b)] and y [(c) and (d)] polarization components of the vector potential on different slices in the x̂ŷ plane at z = 0λc, 170λc, 340λc, and 512λc for beams 1 [(a) and (c)] and 2 [(b) and (d)] in case III.
    Normalized absolute amplitude of the x [(a) and (b)] and y [(c) and (d)] polarization components of the vector potential on different slices in the x̂–ŷ plane at z = 0λc, 170λc, 340λc, and 512λc for beams 1 [(a) and (c)] and 2 [(b) and (d)] in case IV.
    Fig. 5. Normalized absolute amplitude of the x [(a) and (b)] and y [(c) and (d)] polarization components of the vector potential on different slices in the x̂ŷ plane at z = 0λc, 170λc, 340λc, and 512λc for beams 1 [(a) and (c)] and 2 [(b) and (d)] in case IV.
    (a) Normalized absolute amplitude of the vector potential on different slices in the x̂–ŷ plane at z = 0λc, 170λc, 340λc, and 512λc for scattered light from SBS in case II. (b) Normalized absolute amplitude of the density perturbation on different slices in the x̂–ŷ plane at z = 0λc, 170λc, 340λc, and 512λc corresponding to the ion-acoustic wave stimulated by beam 2 in case II.
    Fig. 6. (a) Normalized absolute amplitude of the vector potential on different slices in the x̂ŷ plane at z = 0λc, 170λc, 340λc, and 512λc for scattered light from SBS in case II. (b) Normalized absolute amplitude of the density perturbation on different slices in the x̂ŷ plane at z = 0λc, 170λc, 340λc, and 512λc corresponding to the ion-acoustic wave stimulated by beam 2 in case II.
    Normalized absolute amplitude of the vector potential on different slices in the x̂–ŷ plane at z = 0λc, 170λc, 340λc, and 512λc for (a) beam 1, (b) beam 2, (c) beam 3, and (d) beam 4 in the case of four overlapping beams.
    Fig. 7. Normalized absolute amplitude of the vector potential on different slices in the x̂ŷ plane at z = 0λc, 170λc, 340λc, and 512λc for (a) beam 1, (b) beam 2, (c) beam 3, and (d) beam 4 in the case of four overlapping beams.
    FOPAI of beams 1 and 2 (solid and dashed lines, respectively) diagnosed in the outgoing x̂–ŷ plane. The red curves are for case II of two beams and the black curves for the case of four overlapping beams.
    Fig. 8. FOPAI of beams 1 and 2 (solid and dashed lines, respectively) diagnosed in the outgoing x̂ŷ plane. The red curves are for case II of two beams and the black curves for the case of four overlapping beams.
    CaseLaser conditionSwitch of coupling
    ICPP in same polarizationOff
    IICPP in same polarizationOn
    IIICPP in different polarizationOn
    IVCPP + PSOn
    Table 1. Simulations of propagation of two overlapping beams.
    Liang Hao, Jie Qiu, Wen Yi Huo. Generation of high intensity speckles in overlapping laser beams[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2023, 8(2): 025903
    Download Citation