• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 18, Issue 3, 031401 (2020)
Shanghua Li1、2, Qing Wang1、2、*, Rui Song1、2, Fangfang Hou1、2, Mingwei Gao1、2, and Chunqing Gao1、2
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Optics and Photonics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Information Technology, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL202018.031401 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Shanghua Li, Qing Wang, Rui Song, Fangfang Hou, Mingwei Gao, Chunqing Gao. Laser diode pumped high-energy single-frequency Er:YAG laser with hundreds of nanoseconds pulse duration[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2020, 18(3): 031401 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    We demonstrated a high-energy single-frequency erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser. With 1470 nm laser diodes (LDs) as pumping sources, single-frequency laser pulses with energy of 28.6 mJ, 21.6 mJ, and 15.0 mJ are obtained at pulse repetition frequency of 200 Hz, 300 Hz, and 500 Hz, respectively. As far as we know, this is the highest single-frequency pulse energy with the Er:YAG gain medium. With the ring cavity design, pulse duration is maintained at hundreds of nanoseconds. This high-energy single-frequency laser with hundreds of nanoseconds pulse duration is a prospective laser source for light detection and ranging applications.

    A single-frequency erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser operating at an eye-safe wavelength has drawn much attention in various applications like plastics processing, laser medicine, and wind measurement light detection and ranging (Lidar)[15]. For coherent wind measurement Lidar, range and radial velocity of aerosols need to be measured at the same time. For long range detection, a high-energy single-frequency laser is required, and for accurate radial velocity detection, single-frequency laser pulses with longer pulse duration are required. So, in coherent wind measurement Lidar systems, laser pulses with duration of hundreds of nanoseconds are used[6,7]. There are plenty of works on such a kind of single-frequency laser system[813]. Most of the previous works on a single-frequency pulsed laser are based on a single gain medium, and the highest pulse energy with a single gain medium at 1645 nm is 16 mJ, with a pulse repetition frequency (PRF) of 250 Hz[6].

    For higher energy, a double gain-medium configuration has been used in recent years[1417]. Single-frequency laser pulses with energies of 20.9 mJ[15] and 21 mJ[16] have been obtained at a PRF of 200 Hz and 500 Hz, with pulse duration of 110 ns and 93 ns, respectively.

    These double gain-medium high-energy lasers produce laser pulses with duration around 100 ns, while wind Lidar application requires laser pulses with a duration of hundreds of nanoseconds. Furthermore, for longer detection range, a higher-energy laser pulse is needed and will lead to shorter pulse duration, which will deteriorate the Lidar performance.

    Besides, these single-frequency Er:YAG lasers are completely or partially pumped by a 1532 nm fiber laser, with an extra power transfer stage from a laser diode (LD) to an Er,Yb co-doped fiber laser, resulting in lower electrical to optical efficiency and a complicated system.

    In this Letter, we demonstrate an LD pumped high-energy single-frequency Er:YAG laser at 1645 nm, with the pulse duration maintaining hundreds of nanoseconds. For high-energy laser pulses generation, we compared the common in-band pump source of a 1532 nm LD and 1470 nm LD theoretically. The analysis indicates that the 1470 nm LD outperforms the 1532 nm LD under high-energy operation. By using two 1470 nm LDs as pump sources and injection-locking technology, single-frequency laser pulses with pulse energy of 28.6 mJ, 21.6 mJ, and 15.0 mJ are obtained at PRFs of 200 Hz, 300 Hz, and 500 Hz. The pulse duration is maintained at 159 ns, 191 ns, and 263 ns, respectively, which satisfies the requirement of wind Lidar.

    The center wavelengths of the in-band pump LD for the Er:YAG system are 1470 nm and 1532 nm, respectively. A simple model is used to compare the maximum upper-state density under different pumping wavelengths[18]. The definitions of the parameters used in this Letter are listed in Table 1.

    ItemDefinition
    ΔNInversion density
    f2Pump transition upper-state Boltzmann factor
    f1Pump transition lower-state Boltzmann factor
    N2Upper-state population density
    N1Lower-state population density
    NTotal dopant concentration
    βNormalized upper-state density

    Table 1. Definition of the Parameters

    The inversion density of the pump transition is ΔN=f2N2f1N1.

    In the pump transition process, the actual upper and lower states are N2 and N1, with an inversion density of ΔN. For in-band pumping, the population transfers very fast from N2 and N1 to the laser state N2 and N1 through non-radiative transition, and thus the whole transition process can be treated as a two-level system. In this case, we can view N2, N1, ΔN and N2, N1, ΔN as the same population density.

    Define the normalized upper-state density as β=N2/Nand transition Boltzmann ratio as f=f1/f2.

    Then, inversion density could be expressed as ΔN=f2N[βf(1β)].

    For a laser system, the inversion density of the pump transition should be no greater than zero (the gain medium should absorb rather than emit the photons at the pump wavelength): ΔN=f2N[βf(1β)]<0.Then, β should have an upper bound: βmax=f1+f.f is a wavelength-related function, and the calculation of f is described in Appendix A. The βmax for different wavelengths is shown in Fig. 1.

    Maximum upper-state density versus different pump wavelengths.

    Figure 1.Maximum upper-state density versus different pump wavelengths.

    As shown in Fig. 1, the maximum upper-state population density decreases with the increasing pump wavelength. Thus, the 1470 nm pumping source could provide higher upper-state population density than the 1532 nm pumping source, implying more storage energy, which is conductive to high-energy laser operation.

    Besides, the absorption bandwidth of Er:YAG at room temperature is about 10 nm at 1470 nm, while it is much narrower (less than ∼1 nm) at 1532 nm[19]. Thus, for the 1532 nm LD, additional spectral narrowing components such as volume Bragg grating (VBG) are required to improve the absorption efficiency, which brings additional cost and complexity.

    Under the consideration above, we choose 1470 nm LDs as pump sources for our high-energy laser system.

    The laser is an injection-locking system, consisting of a seed laser, a slave laser, and a control system. The laser system setup is shown in Fig. 2.

    Schematic diagram of laser setup. PD, photo detector; PBS, polarization beam splitter; HWP, half-wave plate; ISO, isolator; LD, laser diode; AOM, acousto-optic modulator; PZT, piezoelectric ceramic transducer.

    Figure 2.Schematic diagram of laser setup. PD, photo detector; PBS, polarization beam splitter; HWP, half-wave plate; ISO, isolator; LD, laser diode; AOM, acousto-optic modulator; PZT, piezoelectric ceramic transducer.

    The slave laser is a ring resonator with double gain media, composed by M1–M7. The gain media are two Φ4mm×60mm Er:YAG ceramic rods, with Er3+ dopant concentration of 0.25% (atomic fraction). Both surfaces of the ceramics are anti-reflection (AR) coated from 1470 nm to 1645 nm. M1 is a curved output coupler with a radius of 1000 mm, which has a transmission of 20% at 1645 nm. M3 is a curved high-reflectivity (HR) mirror with a radius of 1000 mm; M2 is a flat mirror. M4–M7 are dichromatic mirrors; with HR at the lasing wavelength and high transmission (HT) at the pumping wavelength at the angle of 45°. The length of the whole cavity is extended to 2.4 m to generate pulses with long pulse duration. The beam radius of the laser in the two Er:YAG ceramic rods is 470 μm.

    For the ring cavity laser, the large reflection angle of the tilted spherical mirrors will result in astigmatism[16], leading to different beam waist positions in the meridian and sagittal directions. This effect increases the difficulty of beam shaping for the Lidar application. To reduce the astigmatism, spherical mirrors M1 and M3 are tilted by a very small reflection angle (<8°).

    The Er:YAG ceramics in the slave laser are pumped by two fiber-coupled 1470 nm LDs, delivering 40 W output with 10 nm linewidth, respectively.

    The diverging output from the fiber (NA=0.22,200μm core diameter) is a refocus module with a magnification of four, thereby resulting in a beam radius of 400 μm. The pump beam waist is slightly smaller than the laser radius for better beam quality. The acousto-optic modulator (AOM) with 40.68 MHz radio frequency is placed in the region with a moderate beam radius to avoid optical damage.

    The seed laser is an LD pumped Er:YAG non-planar ring oscillator (NPRO), producing 150 mW stable continuous single-frequency output at 1645.22 nm, with a linewidth of less than 10 kHz. The seed laser beam is divided into two parts by a half-wave plate (HWP1) and a polarization beam splitter (PBS), for injection locking and heterodyne detection, respectively. The splitting ratio could be adjusted by HWP1. The s-polarized seed laser is rotated to be p-polarized and injected to the AOM at the first-order diffraction angle through M8. Lens 3 ensures the mode match between the injected master seed laser and the slave laser.

    The injection locking is performed by the “Ramp-Fire” technique. Unfolded mirror M4 is mounted on a piezoelectric ceramic transducer (PZT), which is driven by the control system with a triangular wave. The leaked resonance signal is detected by the photo detector (PD1) behind M3. At the peak of the resonance signal, the cavity length meets the constructive interference condition of the seed laser frequency, and then the AOM is opened to build the laser pulses.

    A small fraction of the output laser pulse is mixed with the seed laser for heterodyne detection, and the heterodyne signal is detected by PD2.

    The Q-switch performance is tested without seed injection. As shown in Fig. 3, laser pulses with energy of 28.7 mJ, 24.4 mJ, and 17.8 mJ, pulse width of 169 ns, 196 ns, and 261 ns at PRF of 200 Hz, 300 Hz, and 500 Hz, respectively, are obtained. The pulse duration is maintained at hundreds of nanoseconds.

    Q-switched pulse energy and width without seed injection versus pump power.

    Figure 3.Q-switched pulse energy and width without seed injection versus pump power.

    After injection locking, the laser produces stable single-frequency pulses with slightly reduced pulse energy. The single-frequency laser output performance is shown in Fig. 4; single-frequency laser pulses with energies of 28.6 mJ, 21.6 mJ, and 15.0 mJ are obtained at PRFs of 200 Hz, 300 Hz, and 500 Hz, with pulse widths of 159 ns, 191 ns, and 263 ns.

    Characteristics of single-frequency pulse energy and width versus pump power.

    Figure 4.Characteristics of single-frequency pulse energy and width versus pump power.

    Figure 5 shows the build-up time of the laser pulses with and without injection at a PRF of 200 Hz. With seed injection, the laser pulses are built up from the injected seed laser, which is far stronger than spontaneous emission, and thus the build-up time is reduced. However, under high pump power, the gain in the cavity is sufficiently high, which ensures that the pulse is built up very fast, even without injection locking. In such case, the reduction of the pulse duration is negligible.

    Build-up time with and without seed injection at a PRF of 200 Hz.

    Figure 5.Build-up time with and without seed injection at a PRF of 200 Hz.

    The heterodyne detection result of the maximum output energy at 200 Hz is shown in Fig. 6. The fast Fourier transformation (FFT) result indicates that the laser pulse is single-frequency, with a linewidth of 3.4 MHz, which is 1.2 times the Fourier transformation limit for the 159 ns pulse width.

    Heterodyne detection result and FFT result at the highest output energy.

    Figure 6.Heterodyne detection result and FFT result at the highest output energy.

    Central frequency stability of the beating signal.

    Figure 7.Central frequency stability of the beating signal.

    As shown in Fig. 7, the central frequency stability of the beating signal is measured in 30 min, with a root mean square (RMS) less than 1.5 MHz.

    The stability of pulse energy under the output energy of 28.6 mJ is also tested in 30 min, with an RMS less than 2.1%.

    The beam profile is measured in different positions by a Pyrocam III-C-A camera (Spricon Inc.) at the highest output energy (Fig. 8). The M2 factors are 1.37 and 1.09 in the x and y directions. The beam quality in meridian and sagittal planes are both diffraction limited, which is important for the long detection range in the wind measurement Lidar system.

    Beam characterization at highest output energy.

    Figure 8.Beam characterization at highest output energy.

    In summary, an LD pumped, single-frequency high-energy Er:YAG laser system suitable for wind measurement Lidar is demonstrated. With the configuration of the double gain media pumped by 1470 nm LDs, up to 28.6 mJ single-frequency laser pulses with pulse duration of 159 ns at 1645 nm under a PRF of 200 Hz are obtained. The M2 factors are 1.37 and 1.09 in the x and y directions, which indicates that the beam quality of the laser is diffraction limited. To the best of our knowledge, 28.6 mJ is the highest single-frequency pulse energy around 1645 nm, with hundreds of nanoseconds pulse duration. This single-frequency high-energy Er:YAG laser system is a suitable laser source for wind measurement Lidar.

    References

    [1] S. D. Setzler, M. P. Francis, Y. E. Young, J. R. Konves, E. P. Chicklis. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 11, 645(2005).

    [2] C. Q. Gao, L. N. Zhu, R. Wang, M. W. Gao, Y. Zheng, L. Wang. Opt. Lett., 37, 1859(2012).

    [3] B. Q. Yao, X. Yu, X. L. Liu, X. M. Duan, Y. L. Ju, Y. Z. Wang. Opt. Express, 21, 8916(2013).

    [4] X. P. Zhu, J. Q. Liu, D. C. Bi, J. Zhou, W. F. Diao, W. B. Chen. Chin. Opt. Lett., 10, 012801(2012).

    [5] R. C. Stoneman, R. Hartman, A. I. R. Malm, P. Gatt. Proc. SPIE, 5791, 167(2005).

    [6] A. Meissner, P. Kucireka, J. Lib, S. Yangb, M. Hoefera, D. Hoffmanna. Proc. SPIE, 8559, 85990H(2013).

    [7] T. Sakimura, K. Hirosawa, Y. Watanabe, T. Ando, S. Kameyama, K. Asaka, H. Tanaka, M. Furuta, M. Hagio, Y. Hirano, H. Inokuchi, T. Yanagisawa. Opt. Express, 27, 24175(2019).

    [8] Y. Deng, X. Yu, B. Q. Yao, T. Y. Dai, X. M. Duan, Y. L. Ju. Laser Phys, 24, 045809(2014).

    [9] B. Q. Yao, Y. Deng, T. Y. Dai, X. M. Duan, Y. L. Ju, Y. Z. Wang. Quantum Electron, 45, 709(2015).

    [10] Q. Ye, C. Q. Gao, S. Wang, Q. X. Na, Y. Shi, Q. Wang, M. W. Gao, J. Zhang. Appl. Phys. B, 122, 198(2016).

    [11] Y. X. Zhang, C. Q. Gao, Q. Wang, Q. X. Na, M. Zhang, M. W. Gao, S. Huang. Chin. Opt. Lett., 17, 031402(2019).

    [12] C. Q. Gao, Y. Shi, Q. Ye, S. Wang, Q. X. Na, Q. Wang, M. W. Gao. Laser Phys. Lett., 15, 025003(2018).

    [13] Y. X. Zhang, C. Q. Gao, Q. Wang, Q. X. Na, M. W. Gao, M. Zhang, S. Huang. Laser Phys. Lett., 16, 115002(2019).

    [14] Z. Z. Yu, M. J. Wang, X. Hou, W. B. Chen. Appl. Phys. B, 122, 84(2016).

    [15] Y. Shi, C. Q. Gao, S. Wang, S. H. Li, R. Song, M. Zhang, M. W. Gao, Q. Wang. Opt. Express, 27, 2671(2019).

    [16] M. Zhang, C. Q. Gao, Q. Wang, M. W. Gao, S. Huang, K. X. Wang. Opt. Express, 27, 23197(2019).

    [17] P. M. Burns, M. Chen, D. Pachowicz, S. Litvinovitch, F. Fitzpatrick, Ni. W. Sawruk. Applications of Lasers for Sensing and Free Space Communications, SW3H-2(2018).

    [18] A. Sennaroglu. Solid-State Lasers and Applications(2007).

    [19] I. Kudryashov, N. Ter-Gabrielyan, M. Dubinskii. Proc. SPIE, 7325, 732505(2009).

    Shanghua Li, Qing Wang, Rui Song, Fangfang Hou, Mingwei Gao, Chunqing Gao. Laser diode pumped high-energy single-frequency Er:YAG laser with hundreds of nanoseconds pulse duration[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2020, 18(3): 031401
    Download Citation