• Acta Photonica Sinica
  • Vol. 51, Issue 10, 1006006 (2022)
Yi YANG1、*, Jiayuan LEI1, Xiaobo WANG2, Fengtao HE1, Yan LIU1, and Huan NIE1
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Electronic Engineering,Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications,Xi'an 710121,China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Underwater Information and Control,China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation 705 Research Institute,Xi'an 710077,China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/gzxb20225110.1006006 Cite this Article
    Yi YANG, Jiayuan LEI, Xiaobo WANG, Fengtao HE, Yan LIU, Huan NIE. Performance of OQPSK Modulation System Based on Composite Seawater Channel[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2022, 51(10): 1006006 Copy Citation Text show less
    The block diagram of the UWOC system with OQPSK modulation scheme
    Fig. 1. The block diagram of the UWOC system with OQPSK modulation scheme
    Demodulation schematic of OQPSK
    Fig. 2. Demodulation schematic of OQPSK
    Schematic of beam expansion
    Fig. 3. Schematic of beam expansion
    Flowchart of acceptance-rejection sampling algorithm
    Fig. 4. Flowchart of acceptance-rejection sampling algorithm
    EGG distribution probability density function diagram and random noise histogram
    Fig. 5. EGG distribution probability density function diagram and random noise histogram
    Comparison of BER performance of OQPSK modulation system in composite channels with different turbulence intensity
    Fig. 6. Comparison of BER performance of OQPSK modulation system in composite channels with different turbulence intensity
    Comparison of BER performance of different modulations in composite channels
    Fig. 7. Comparison of BER performance of different modulations in composite channels
    OQPSK-UWOC system transmission model
    Fig. 8. OQPSK-UWOC system transmission model
    OQPSK modulation signal through different channel
    Fig. 9. OQPSK modulation signal through different channel
    Comparison of OQPSK signal waveform of different turbulence coherence time
    Fig. 10. Comparison of OQPSK signal waveform of different turbulence coherence time
    Comparison of BER performance for different coherent time in composite channels
    Fig. 11. Comparison of BER performance for different coherent time in composite channels
    Comparison of BER performance for different transmission distances and turbulence intensities in composite channels
    Fig. 12. Comparison of BER performance for different transmission distances and turbulence intensities in composite channels
    Comparison of BER performance for different transmission distances in composite channels
    Fig. 13. Comparison of BER performance for different transmission distances in composite channels
    Comparison of BER performance for different noise power in composite channels
    Fig. 14. Comparison of BER performance for different noise power in composite channels
    Comparison of BER performance for different water quality in composite channels
    Fig. 15. Comparison of BER performance for different water quality in composite channels
    Water typesa/m-1b/m-1c/m-1
    Pure ocean0.0410.0030.044
    Clean ocean0.1140.0370.151
    Coastal ocean0.1790.2190.398
    Turbid harbour0.3661.8242.190
    Table 1. Attenuation coefficients for different water quality22
    NameParameters
    LD wavelength532 nm
    Transmitter aperture radius10 mm
    Receiver aperture radius20 mm
    Half angle of beam divergence0.5 mrad
    Transmit power1 W
    Attenuation coefficient0.151 m-1
    Binary sequence length106
    Transmission distance40 m
    Equivalent load resistance50 Ω
    Table 2. Simulation system parameters
    Yi YANG, Jiayuan LEI, Xiaobo WANG, Fengtao HE, Yan LIU, Huan NIE. Performance of OQPSK Modulation System Based on Composite Seawater Channel[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2022, 51(10): 1006006
    Download Citation