Author Affiliations
1School of Computer and Information Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China2Key Laboratory of Beijing for Railway Engineering, Beijing 100044, China3Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, Beijing 100044, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Normal vector of point cloud
Fig. 2. Normal vector of feature region and non-feature region. (a) Feature area; (b) non-feature area
Fig. 3. Feature point and non-feature point
Fig. 4. Algorithm for adaptive k-neighbor selection
Fig. 5. star model and local feature parameter distribution of the model. (a) star model; (b) LEFD distribution
Fig. 6. fandisk model and local feature parameter distribution map of the model. (a) fandisk model; (b) LEFD distribution
Fig. 7. Algorithm for edge detection
Fig. 8. Model point cloud visualization
Fig. 9. Comparison of results of complex models. (a)-(c) Original point cloud; (d)-(f) results of BE method;(g)-(i) results of the method in literature[10]; (j)-(l) results of the method in literature[10]; (m)-(o) results of our method
Fig. 10. Comparison of results of simple models. (a)-(c) Original point cloud; (d)-(f) results of BE method;(g)-(i) results of the method in literature[10]; (j)-(l) results of the method in literature[10]; (m)-(o) results of our method
Fig. 11. Dihedral angle with different angles. (a) 22°; (b) 45°; (c) 90°
Fig. 12. Results of noise immunity. (a) fandisk model, adding noise with standard deviation of 0.5%; (b) fandisk model, adding noise with standard deviation of 2%; (c) bunny model, adding noise with standard deviation of 0.5%; (d) bunny model, adding noise with standard deviation of 2%
Fig. 13. Data acquired by Kinect. (a) chair 1; (b) chair 2
Fig. 14. Detection of Kinect data with our method. (a) chair 1; (b) chair 2
Point | |
---|
k=10 | k=14 | k=18 | k=22 | k=26 | k=30 |
---|
a | 1.47×10-10 | 1.80×10-10 | 3.54×10-10 | 2.79×10-10 | 1.74×10-10 | 2.50×10-10 | b | 1.73×10-10 | 2.58×10-10 | 0.149 | 0.207 | 0.248 | 0.194 | c | 0.527 | 0.573 | 0.604 | 0.592 | 0.662 | 0.634 |
|
Table 1. Calculated characteristic value of mean angle of normal vector
Point | σp1 | σp2 | σp3 | σp4 | σp5 |
---|
a | 1.224 | 1.966 | 0.788 | 0.623 | 1.436 | b | 1.491 | 5×108 | 1.389 | 1.198 | 0.782 | c | 1.087 | 1.054 | 0.980 | 1.118 | 0.957 |
|
Table 2. Rate of change of mean angle of normal vector
Method | P | R |
---|
22° | 45° | 90° | 22° | 45° | 90° |
---|
BE | 0.713 | 0.790 | 0.892 | 0.554 | 0.691 | 0.684 | Method in literature[10] | 0.795 | 0.907 | 0.902 | 0.962 | 0.873 | 0.909 | Method in literature[12] | 0.773 | 0.854 | 0.892 | 0.926 | 0.915 | 0.922 | Ours | 0.834 | 0.920 | 0.924 | 0.941 | 0.932 | 0.916 |
|
Table 3. Edge detection of several dihedral angles