• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 47, Issue 6, 604003 (2020)
Gao Jiayue1, Xu Hongli1、2、*, Shao Kailiang1, and Yin Hui1、3
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Computer and Information Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Beijing for Railway Engineering, Beijing 100044, China
  • 3Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, Beijing 100044, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL202047.0604003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Gao Jiayue, Xu Hongli, Shao Kailiang, Yin Hui. An Adaptive Edge Detection Method Based on Local Edge Feature Descriptor[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2020, 47(6): 604003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Normal vector of point cloud
    Fig. 1. Normal vector of point cloud
    Normal vector of feature region and non-feature region. (a) Feature area; (b) non-feature area
    Fig. 2. Normal vector of feature region and non-feature region. (a) Feature area; (b) non-feature area
    Feature point and non-feature point
    Fig. 3. Feature point and non-feature point
    Algorithm for adaptive k-neighbor selection
    Fig. 4. Algorithm for adaptive k-neighbor selection
    star model and local feature parameter distribution of the model. (a) star model; (b) LEFD distribution
    Fig. 5. star model and local feature parameter distribution of the model. (a) star model; (b) LEFD distribution
    fandisk model and local feature parameter distribution map of the model. (a) fandisk model; (b) LEFD distribution
    Fig. 6. fandisk model and local feature parameter distribution map of the model. (a) fandisk model; (b) LEFD distribution
    Algorithm for edge detection
    Fig. 7. Algorithm for edge detection
    Model point cloud visualization
    Fig. 8. Model point cloud visualization
    Comparison of results of complex models. (a)-(c) Original point cloud; (d)-(f) results of BE method;(g)-(i) results of the method in literature[10]; (j)-(l) results of the method in literature[10]; (m)-(o) results of our method
    Fig. 9. Comparison of results of complex models. (a)-(c) Original point cloud; (d)-(f) results of BE method;(g)-(i) results of the method in literature[10]; (j)-(l) results of the method in literature[10]; (m)-(o) results of our method
    Comparison of results of simple models. (a)-(c) Original point cloud; (d)-(f) results of BE method;(g)-(i) results of the method in literature[10]; (j)-(l) results of the method in literature[10]; (m)-(o) results of our method
    Fig. 10. Comparison of results of simple models. (a)-(c) Original point cloud; (d)-(f) results of BE method;(g)-(i) results of the method in literature[10]; (j)-(l) results of the method in literature[10]; (m)-(o) results of our method
    Dihedral angle with different angles. (a) 22°; (b) 45°; (c) 90°
    Fig. 11. Dihedral angle with different angles. (a) 22°; (b) 45°; (c) 90°
    Results of noise immunity. (a) fandisk model, adding noise with standard deviation of 0.5%; (b) fandisk model, adding noise with standard deviation of 2%; (c) bunny model, adding noise with standard deviation of 0.5%; (d) bunny model, adding noise with standard deviation of 2%
    Fig. 12. Results of noise immunity. (a) fandisk model, adding noise with standard deviation of 0.5%; (b) fandisk model, adding noise with standard deviation of 2%; (c) bunny model, adding noise with standard deviation of 0.5%; (d) bunny model, adding noise with standard deviation of 2%
    Data acquired by Kinect. (a) chair 1; (b) chair 2
    Fig. 13. Data acquired by Kinect. (a) chair 1; (b) chair 2
    Detection of Kinect data with our method. (a) chair 1; (b) chair 2
    Fig. 14. Detection of Kinect data with our method. (a) chair 1; (b) chair 2
    Pointnpk
    k=10k=14k=18k=22k=26k=30
    a1.47×10-101.80×10-103.54×10-102.79×10-101.74×10-102.50×10-10
    b1.73×10-102.58×10-100.1490.2070.2480.194
    c0.5270.5730.6040.5920.6620.634
    Table 1. Calculated characteristic value of mean angle of normal vector
    Pointσp1σp2σp3σp4σp5
    a1.2241.9660.7880.6231.436
    b1.4915×1081.3891.1980.782
    c1.0871.0540.9801.1180.957
    Table 2. Rate of change of mean angle of normal vector
    MethodPR
    22°45°90°22°45°90°
    BE0.7130.7900.8920.5540.6910.684
    Method in literature[10]0.7950.9070.9020.9620.8730.909
    Method in literature[12]0.7730.8540.8920.9260.9150.922
    Ours0.8340.9200.9240.9410.9320.916
    Table 3. Edge detection of several dihedral angles
    Gao Jiayue, Xu Hongli, Shao Kailiang, Yin Hui. An Adaptive Edge Detection Method Based on Local Edge Feature Descriptor[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2020, 47(6): 604003
    Download Citation