• Journal of Semiconductors
  • Vol. 43, Issue 6, 060201 (2022)
Min Li1, Jilin Wang3, Liming Ding2, and Xiaoyan Du1
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Physics, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
  • 2Center for Excellence in Nanoscience (CAS), Key Laboratory of Nanosystem and Hierarchical Fabrication (CAS), National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190, China
  • 3School of Materials Science and Engineering, Key Laboratory of New Processing Technology for Nonferrous Metals and Materials (MoE), Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/43/6/060201 Cite this Article
    Min Li, Jilin Wang, Liming Ding, Xiaoyan Du. Large-area organic solar cells[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2022, 43(6): 060201 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Abstract

    Organic solar cells (OSCs) have made significant progress due to the fast advances in nonfullerene acceptors (NFAs) since 2015[1-7]. The power conversion efficiency (PCE) for small-area single-junction OSCs is around 19% with an active area <0.1 cm 2[8-11]. Scalability is a key factor in developing this technology. When scaling lab cells to large-area modules, the device performance might drop. Brabec et al. proposed a stage–gate process for OSCs from R&D effort to commercialization, which includes materials development, processing, prototyping, pilot process and upscaling[12]. Lab-to-fab transfer involves processing environment (glovebox or ambient air), coating technique (spin coating or scalable techniques), device size (<1, 1–200, or >200 cm2), device type (cells or modules), top electrode (evaporated or printed) and solvent (halogenated or green). To visualize the upscaling losses, representative high-efficiency lab cells with small active areas and those single cells and modules with active area over 1 cm2 reported from 2018 to 2021 are summarized in Fig. 1(a) and Table 1. In addition, the records in NREL’s Champion Module Efficiencies Chart are also included for comparison[13]. The PCE usually declines with the increase of the active area of the devices.

    (Color online) (a) The PCEs for lab cells with small areas and for devices and modules with active area over 1 cm2 (2018–2021); the records in NREL’s Champion Module Efficiencies Chart are included for comparison. (b) The chemical structures for the active materials. (c) Schematic for the device structure and J–V curves for 18 cm2 module with a PCE of 14.45% (certified 13.98%). Reproduced with permission[14], Copyright 2020, Elsevier. (d) 25.21 cm2 module; J–V curve changes with number of subcells. Reproduced with permission[15], Copyright 2021, Wiley. (e) Schematic for the blade-coating process and J–V curves for modules with different active layers. Reproduced with permission[16], Copyright 2021, Springer Nature.

    Figure 1.(Color online) (a) The PCEs for lab cells with small areas and for devices and modules with active area over 1 cm2 (2018–2021); the records in NREL’s Champion Module Efficiencies Chart are included for comparison. (b) The chemical structures for the active materials. (c) Schematic for the device structure and J–V curves for 18 cm2 module with a PCE of 14.45% (certified 13.98%). Reproduced with permission[14], Copyright 2020, Elsevier. (d) 25.21 cm2 module; J–V curve changes with number of subcells. Reproduced with permission[15], Copyright 2021, Wiley. (e) Schematic for the blade-coating process and J–V curves for modules with different active layers. Reproduced with permission[16], Copyright 2021, Springer Nature.

    The representative high-performance solar modules with active area over 1 cm2 are presented in Fig. 1. The chemical structures for the photoactive materials are shown in Fig. 1(b). In 2020, Huang et al. designed a nonfullerene acceptor named DTY6, and PM6:DTY6 module (area 18 cm2) gave a PCE of 14.45% (certified 13.98%) (Fig. 1(c))[14]. Very recently, Zhou et al. found that the long side chain of BTP-eC9 inhibited excessive aggregation when processed with chlorobenzene (CB), and PM6:BTP-eC9 module offered a PCE of 14.07% with a wide processing window (area 25 cm2) (Fig. 1(d))[15]. Liet al. reported a Y6 derivative named BTO, and PM6:Y6:BTO:PC71BM module gave a PCE of 14.26% (area 36 cm2), which was realized without thermal annealing and with non-halogenated processing solvent. It is the record for OSC modules with an active area exceeding 20 cm2 (Fig. 1(e))[16].

    The efficiency loss for solar modules relates to the change of processing method and increase of area[17]. Spin-coating is a common method for making lab cells, but not suitable for making large-area modules[18]. Slot-die coating is one of the most practical coating techniques for solar modules. In 2020, Wei et al. used slot-die coating to make PTB7-Th:COi8DFIC:PC71BM ternary devices, achieving PCEs of 12.16% and 10.09% for 1 and 25 cm2 flexible devices, respectively (Fig. 2(a))[19]. Environmental-friendly manufacturing requires non-toxic solvents, also leading to PCE loss due to limited solubility of the active materials[20]. Side-chain engineering is an effective approach to optimize active-layer morphology and attain high-performance organic photovoltaic (OPV) modules.

    (Color online) (a) Schematic for spin coating and slot-die coating (top) and J–V curves for single cells and modules with different active area (bottom). Reproduced with permission[19], Copyright 2020, Wiley. (b) Photos and J–V curves for 26 cm2 module (PCE 12.6%) and 204 cm2 module (PCE 11.7%) (top) certified by Fraunhofer ISE. Reproduced with permission[12], Copyright 2020, Wiley. PCE changes with active cell width. Reproduced with permission[21], Copyright 2020, Wiley. (c) Schematic for the device structure; J–V curves change with the number of subcells (module area is up to 54 cm2). Reproduced with permission[23], Copyright 2021, Wiley.

    Figure 2.(Color online) (a) Schematic for spin coating and slot-die coating (top) and J–V curves for single cells and modules with different active area (bottom). Reproduced with permission[19], Copyright 2020, Wiley. (b) Photos and J–V curves for 26 cm2 module (PCE 12.6%) and 204 cm2 module (PCE 11.7%) (top) certified by Fraunhofer ISE. Reproduced with permission[12], Copyright 2020, Wiley. PCE changes with active cell width. Reproduced with permission[21], Copyright 2020, Wiley. (c) Schematic for the device structure; J–V curves change with the number of subcells (module area is up to 54 cm2). Reproduced with permission[23], Copyright 2021, Wiley.

    The geometrical fill factor (GFF), defined as the ratio of active area and module area, needs to be considered when evaluating the upscaling loss in PCE. In 2020, Egelhaaf et al. optimized laser patterning parameters and the number of cells in the module for high GFF with minimum PCE loss. The certified PCEs were 12.6% for 26 cm2 module and 11.7% for 204 cm2 module. The GFF was over 95% (Fig. 2(b))[21]. Before this report, the record efficiency 8.7% for OPV module (802 cm2) was demonstrated by Toshiba.

    For large area and low cost, all functional layers should be processed via solution coating. PEDOT:PSS is commonly used with metal grid as electrode, but its transmittance is weak in the spectral region over 600 nm, which is of great importance to the absorption of the active layer[22]. Recently, Zhou et al. made a solution-processed composite electrode AgNWs:PEI-Zn and it presented low roughness, high transmittance and good thermal stability. A 54 cm2 flexible module with a 13.2% PCE was obtained (Fig. 2(c))[23]. However, the top MoOx/Ag layer was still thermally evaporated. In 2019, evaporation-free flexible OSC modules offered a PCE of 5.25% on an active area of 80 cm2[24]. In 2021, Egelhaaf et al. developed a printable silver-nanoparticle (AgNP) film as top electrode and achieved a similar performance as the evaporated ones. The maximum PCE for 4 cm2 modules with AgNP electrode was 7%[25]. Great efforts are still needed to realize all-solution processed efficient OPV modules.

    In short, large-area OSCs have made inspiring advances with the development of novel materials and processing techniques. Efforts are needed to improve the scalability of OSCs and achieve large-area, low-cost, environmental-friendly and all-layer-printed modules.

    Table Infomation Is Not Enable

    Acknowledgements

    X. Du thanks National Natural Science Foundation of China (52103222), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2021QA009), Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province (tsqn202103016) and Qilu Young Scholar Program of Shandong University. L. Ding thanks the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFA0206600), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51922032 and 21961160720), and the open research fund of Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory (2021SLABFK02) for financial support.

    References

    [1] Y Tong, Z Xiao, X Du et al. Progress of the key materials for organic solar cells. Sci China Chem, 63, 758(2020).

    [2] C Duan, L Ding. The new era for organic solar cells: Non-fullerene small molecular acceptors. Sci Bull, 65, 1231(2020).

    [3] J Cao, L Yi, L Ding. The origin and evolution of Y6 structure. J Semicond, 43, 030202(2022).

    [4] Q Liu, Y Jiang, K Jin et al. 18% efficiency organic solar cells. Sci Bull, 65, 272(2020).

    [5] J Qin, L Zhang, C Zuo et al. A chlorinated copolymer donor demonstrates a 18.13% power conversion efficiency. J Semicond, 42, 010501(2021).

    [6] K Jin, Z Ou, Z Lixiu et al. A chlorinated lactone polymer donor featuring high performance and low cost. J Semicond, 43, 050501(2022).

    [7] W Guan, D Yuan, J Wu et al. Blade-coated organic solar cells from non-halogenated solvent offer 17% efficiency. J Semicond, 42, 030502(2021).

    [8] Y Cui, Y Xu, H Yao et al. Single-junction organic photovoltaic cell with 19% efficiency. Adv Mater, 33, 2102420(2021).

    [9] K Jin, Z Xiao, L Ding. 18.69% power conversion efficiency from organic solar cells. J Semicond, 42, 060502(2021).

    [10] K Jin, Z Xiao, L Ding. D18, an eximious solar polymer!. J Semicond, 42, 010502(2021).

    [11] X Meng, K Jin, Z Xiao et al. Side chain engineering on D18 polymers yields 18.74% power conversion efficiency. J Semicond, 42, 100501(2021).

    [12] C J Brabec, A Distler, X Du et al. Material strategies to accelerate OPV technology toward a GW technology. Adv Energy Mater, 10, 2001864(2020).

    [13]

    [14] S Dong, T Jia, K Zhang et al. Single-component non-halogen solvent-processed high-performance organic solar cell module with efficiency over 14%. Joule, 4, 2004(2020).

    [15] X Dong, Y Jiang, L Sun et al. Large-area organic solar modules with efficiency over 14%. Adv Funct Mater, 2110209(2021).

    [16] H Chen, R Zhang, X Chen et al. A guest-assisted molecular-organization approach for >17% efficiency organic solar cells using environmentally friendly solvents. Nat Energy, 6, 1045(2021).

    [17] S Park, T Kim, S Yoon et al. Progress in materials, solution processes, and long-term stability for large-area organic photovoltaics. Adv Mater, 32, 2002217(2020).

    [18] G Wang, M A Adil, J Zhang et al. Large-area organic solar cells: Material requirements, modular designs, and printing methods. Adv Mater, 31, 1805089(2019).

    [19] G Wang, J Zhang, C Yang et al. Synergistic optimization enables large-area flexible organic solar cells to maintain over 98% PCE of the small-area rigid devices. Adv Mater, 32, 2005153(2020).

    [20] Y Zhang, K Liu, J Huang et al. Graded bulk-heterojunction enables 17% binary organic solar cells via nonhalogenated open air coating. Nat Commun, 12, 4815(2021).

    [21] A Distler, C J Brabec, H J Egelhaaf. Organic photovoltaic modules with new world record efficiencies. Prog Photovolt Res Appl, 29, 24(2020).

    [22] W Pan, Y Han, Z Wang et al. Over 1 cm2 flexible organic solar cells. J Semicond, 42, 050301(2021).

    [23] F Qin, L Sun, H Chen et al. 54 cm2 large-area flexible organic solar modules with efficiency above 13%. Adv Mater, 33, 2103017(2021).

    [24] Y W Han, S J Jeon, H S Lee et al. Evaporation-free nonfullerene flexible organic solar cell modules manufactured by an all-solution process. Adv Energy Mater, 9, 1902065(2019).

    [25] K C Tam, H Saito, P Maisch et al. Highly reflective and low resistive top electrode for organic solar cells and modules by low temperature silver nanoparticle ink. Sol RRL, 6, 2100887(2021).

    [26] Y Cui, H Yao, L Hong et al. Organic photovoltaic cell with 17% efficiency and superior processability. Natl Sci Rev, 7, 1239(2020).

    [27] K An, F Peng, W Zhong et al. Improving photovoltaic parameters of all-polymer solar cells through integrating two polymeric donors. Sci China Chem, 64, 2010(2021).

    [28] X Liu, Z Zheng, J Wang et al. Fluidic manipulating of printable zinc oxide for flexible organic solar cells. Adv Mater, 34, 2106453(2021).

    [29] Y Cui, H Yao, J Zhang et al. Single-junction organic photovoltaic cells with approaching 18% efficiency. Adv Mater, 32, 1908205(2020).

    [30] U Würfel, J Herterich, M List et al. A 1 cm2 organic solar cell with 15.2% certified efficiency: Detailed characterization and identification of optimization potential. Sol RRL, 5, 2000802(2021).

    [31] Y Han, X Chen, J Wei et al. Efficiency above 12% for 1 cm2 flexible organic solar cells with Ag/Cu grid transparent conducting electrode. Adv Sci, 6, 1901490(2019).

    [32] R Sun, Q Wu, J Guo et al. A layer-by-layer architecture for printable organic solar cells overcoming the scaling lag of module efficiency. Joule, 4, 407(2020).

    [33] X Meng, L Zhang, Y Xie et al. A general approach for lab-to-manufacturing translation on flexible organic solar cells. Adv Mater, 31, 1903649(2019).

    [34] K Zhang, Z Chen, A Armin et al. Efficient large area organic solar cells processed by blade-coating with single-component green solvent. Sol RRL, 2, 1700169(2018).

    [35] L Mao, B Luo, L Sun et al. Writable and patternable organic solar cells and modules inspired by an old chinese calligraphy tradition. Mater Horizons, 5, 123(2018).

    [36] J H Jeong, M Jahandar, A Prasetio et al. Multi-dimensional interfacial engineering for a practical large-area transparent flexible organic photovoltaics. Chem Eng J, 419, 129672(2021).

    [37] Z Jia, Z Chen, X Chen et al. 19.34  cm2 large-area quaternary organic photovoltaic module with 12.36% certified efficiency. Photonics Res, 9, 324(2021).

    [38] C Y Liao, Y Chen, C C Lee et al. Processing strategies for an organic photovoltaic module with over 10% efficiency. Joule, 4, 189(2020).

    [39] Y M Chang, C Y Liao, C C Lee et al. All solution and ambient processable organic photovoltaic modules fabricated by slot-die coating and achieved a certified 7.56% power conversion efficiency. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 202, 110064(2019).

    [40] J Lee, Y H Seo, S N Kwon et al. Slot-die and roll-to-roll processed single junction organic photovoltaic cells with the highest efficiency. Adv Energy Mater, 9, 1901805(2019).

    [41] Y W Han, H S Lee, D K Moon. Printable and semitransparent nonfullerene organic solar modules over 30 cm2 introducing an energy-level controllable hole transport layer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 13, 19085(2021).

    [42] L Mao, L Sun, B Luo et al. Patching defects in the active layer of large-area organic solar cells. J Mater Chem A, 6, 5817(2018).

    [43] S Rasool, D V Vu, C E Song et al. Room temperature processed highly efficient large-area polymer solar cells achieved with molecular engineering of copolymers. Adv Energy Mater, 9, 1900168(2019).

    [44] P Apilo, M Välimäki, R Po et al. Fully roll-to-roll printed P3HT/indene-C60-bisadduct modules with high open-circuit voltage and efficiency. Sol RRL, 2, 1700160(2018).

    [45] S H Park, S Park, S Lee et al. Developement of highly efficient large area organic photovoltaic module: Effects of nonfullerene acceptor. Nano Energy, 77, 105147(2020).

    [46] S H Park, S Park, D Kurniawan et al. Highly efficient large-area organic photovoltaic module with a 350 nm thick active layer using a random terpolymer donor. Chem Mater, 32, 3469(2020).

    [47] S Strohm, F Machui, S Langner et al. P3HT: Non-fullerene acceptor based large area, semi-transparent PV modules with power conversion efficiencies of 5%, processed by industrially scalable methods. Energy Environ Sci, 11, 2225(2018).

    [48] O A Ibraikulov, J Wang, N Kamatham et al. ITO-free organic photovoltaic modules based on fluorinated polymers deposited from non-halogenated solution: A major step toward large-scale module production. Sol RRL, 3, 1900273(2019).

    [49] D Wang, G Zhou, Y Li et al. High-performance organic solar cells from non-halogenated solvents. Adv Funct Mater, 32, 2107827(2021).

    [50] K M Huang, Y Q Wong, M C Lin et al. Highly efficient and stable organic solar cell modules processed by blade coating with 5.6% module efficiency and active area of 216 cm2. Prog Photovolt, 27, 264(2019).

    [51] K M Huang, C M Lin, S H Chen et al. Nonfullerene polymer solar cell with large active area of 216 cm2 and high power conversion efficiency of 7.7%. Sol RRL, 3, 1900071(2019).