• Acta Physica Sinica
  • Vol. 68, Issue 9, 090204-1 (2019)
Jia-Hang Su1、2、*, Jun Wu2, and Si-De Hu3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Graduate School of China Academy of Engineering Physics, Beijing 100088, China
  • 2Center for Strategic Studies, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Beijing 100088, China
  • 3China Academy of Engineering Physics, Beijing 100088, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.7498/aps.68.20190107 Cite this Article
    Jia-Hang Su, Jun Wu, Si-De Hu. Identification of spent nuclear fuel with multivariate analysis based on database[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(9): 090204-1 Copy Citation Text show less
    Visualization of database in three-dimensional space.数据库在3维空间的可视化处理
    Fig. 1. Visualization of database in three-dimensional space.数据库在3维空间的可视化处理
    Diagram for Heron’s formula (U stands for unknown sample, A1, A2, B1, B2 stand for known samples).海伦公式示意图(U点为未知样品点, A1, A2, B1, B2为已知样品点)
    Fig. 2. Diagram for Heron’s formula (U stands for unknown sample, A1, A2, B1, B2 stand for known samples). 海伦公式示意图(U点为未知样品点, A1, A2, B1, B2为已知样品点)
    The Polynomial fitting of the linear function values of unknown sample 1.对未知样品1的各线性函数值的多项式拟合
    Fig. 3. The Polynomial fitting of the linear function values of unknown sample 1.对未知样品1的各线性函数值的多项式拟合
    Comparation of the three multivariate analysis methods.三种多元统计方法的比较
    Fig. 4. Comparation of the three multivariate analysis methods.三种多元统计方法的比较
    堆型初始装料丰度燃耗/GWd·tU-1
    PWRUO22%—4.5%5—50
    PWRMOX天然铀, 4%—5%裂变钚30—50
    CANDUUO20.711%0.3, 2—8
    CANDUUO21.2%5—20
    LMFBRMOX80%的贫化铀(0.2%以下), 12%的Pu-239, 8%的Pu-24050—100
    MAGNOX (HTGR)UO20.711%1—10
    GCR (HTGR)UO21%—4%1—20
    HTGRUO210%—30%5—30
    Table 1. Input parameters for reactor simulation.
    未知样品模拟参数
    堆型初始装料燃耗/GWd·tU–1
    1PWRUO2, 3.2% 23
    2PWRMOX, 4.7% 裂变钚38
    3HTGRUO2, 18% 27
    Table 2. Input parameters for unknown spent nuclear fuel.
    未知样品模拟参数预测参数相对误差
    堆型初始装料燃耗/GWd·tU–1堆型初始装料燃耗/GWd·tU–1初始装料燃耗/GWd·tU–1
    1PWRUO2, 3.2% 23PWR3.197%23.1040.5%2.08%
    2PWRMOX, 4.7%裂变钚38PWR4.686%38.3242.78%6.49%
    3HTGRUO2, 18% 27HTGR17.855%27.3282.91%6.55%
    Table 3.

    Result of identification by using factor analysis.

    因子分析鉴别结果

    未知样品分类概率
    真实预测1(PWR UO2) 2(PWR MOX)3(CANDU)4(LMFBR)5(MAGNOX)6(GCR)7(HTGR)
    Uk1110.985200.01480000
    Uk2220100000
    Uk3770000001
    Table 4.

    Result for the determination of reactor type.

    反应堆类型判断结果

    未知样品模拟参数因子分析结果线性判别分析结果
    初始装料燃耗/GWd·tU–1初始装料燃耗/GWd·tU–1初始装料燃耗/GWd·tU–1
    1UO2, 3.2% 233.197%23.1043.201%23.0361
    2MOX, 4.7%裂变钚384.686%38.3244.703%37.9312
    3UO2,18% 2717.855%27.32818.003%27.9196
    Table 5.

    The comparation of the results from discrimination analysis and factor analysis.

    线性判别分析与因子分析结果比较

    未知样品模拟参数因子分析结果线性判别分析结果线性回归分析结果
    初始装料燃耗/GWd·tU–1初始装料燃耗/GWd·tU–1初始装料燃耗/GWd·tU–1初始装料燃耗/GWd·tU–1
    1UO2, 3.2% 233.197%23.1043.201%23.03613.2005%23.022
    2MOX, 4.7%裂变钚384.686%38.3244.703%37.93124.6993%38.019
    3UO2, 18% 2717.855%27.32818.003%27.919618.001%26.991
    Table 6.

    Results for the determination of initial enrichment of uranium and burn-up by linear regression analysis.

    利用线性回归分析进行初始装料与燃耗的鉴别分析的结果

    Jia-Hang Su, Jun Wu, Si-De Hu. Identification of spent nuclear fuel with multivariate analysis based on database[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(9): 090204-1
    Download Citation