Author Affiliations
1Graduate School of China Academy of Engineering Physics, Beijing 100088, China2Center for Strategic Studies, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Beijing 100088, China3China Academy of Engineering Physics, Beijing 100088, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Visualization of database in three-dimensional space.数据库在3维空间的可视化处理
Fig. 2. Diagram for Heron’s formula (U stands for unknown sample, A1, A2, B1, B2 stand for known samples).
海伦公式示意图(U点为未知样品点, A1, A2, B1, B2为已知样品点)
Fig. 3. The Polynomial fitting of the linear function values of unknown sample 1.对未知样品1的各线性函数值的多项式拟合
Fig. 4. Comparation of the three multivariate analysis methods.三种多元统计方法的比较
堆型 | 初始装料 | 丰度 | 燃耗/GWd·tU-1 | PWR | UO2 | 2%—4.5% | 5—50 | PWR | MOX | 天然铀, 4%—5%裂变钚 | 30—50 | CANDU | UO2 | 0.711% | 0.3, 2—8 | CANDU | UO2 | 1.2% | 5—20 | LMFBR | MOX | 80%的贫化铀(0.2%以下), 12%的Pu-239, 8%的Pu-240 | 50—100 | MAGNOX (HTGR) | UO2 | 0.711% | 1—10 | GCR (HTGR) | UO2 | 1%—4% | 1—20 | HTGR | UO2 | 10%—30% | 5—30 |
|
Table 1. Input parameters for reactor simulation.
未知样品 | 模拟参数 | 堆型 | 初始装料 | 燃耗/GWd·tU–1 | 1 | PWR | UO2, 3.2%
| 23 | 2 | PWR | MOX, 4.7% 裂变钚 | 38 | 3 | HTGR | UO2, 18%
| 27 |
|
Table 2. Input parameters for unknown spent nuclear fuel.
未知样品 | 模拟参数 | | 预测参数 | | 相对误差 | 堆型 | 初始装料 | 燃耗/GWd·tU–1 | 堆型 | 初始装料 | 燃耗/GWd·tU–1 | 初始装料 | 燃耗/GWd·tU–1 | 1 | PWR | UO2, 3.2%
| 23 | | PWR | 3.197% | 23.104 | | 0.5% | 2.08% | 2 | PWR | MOX, 4.7%裂变钚 | 38 | PWR | 4.686% | 38.324 | 2.78% | 6.49% | 3 | HTGR | UO2, 18%
| 27 | HTGR | 17.855% | 27.328 | 2.91% | 6.55% |
|
Table 3. Result of identification by using factor analysis.
因子分析鉴别结果
未知样品 | 分类 | | 概率 | 真实 | 预测 | 1(PWR UO2)
| 2(PWR MOX) | 3(CANDU) | 4(LMFBR) | 5(MAGNOX) | 6(GCR) | 7(HTGR) | Uk1 | 1 | 1 | | 0.9852 | 0 | 0.0148 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Uk2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Uk3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
Table 4. Result for the determination of reactor type.
反应堆类型判断结果
未知样品 | 模拟参数 | | 因子分析结果 | | 线性判别分析结果 | 初始装料 | 燃耗/GWd·tU–1 | 初始装料 | 燃耗/GWd·tU–1 | 初始装料 | 燃耗/GWd·tU–1 | 1 | UO2, 3.2%
| 23 | | 3.197% | 23.104 | | 3.201% | 23.0361 | 2 | MOX, 4.7%裂变钚 | 38 | 4.686% | 38.324 | 4.703% | 37.9312 | 3 | UO2,18%
| 27 | 17.855% | 27.328 | 18.003% | 27.9196 |
|
Table 5. The comparation of the results from discrimination analysis and factor analysis.
线性判别分析与因子分析结果比较
未知样品 | 模拟参数 | | 因子分析结果 | | 线性判别分析结果 | | 线性回归分析结果 | 初始装料 | 燃耗/GWd·tU–1 | 初始装料 | 燃耗/GWd·tU–1 | 初始装料 | 燃耗/GWd·tU–1 | 初始装料 | 燃耗/GWd·tU–1 | 1 | UO2, 3.2%
| 23 | | 3.197% | 23.104 | | 3.201% | 23.0361 | | 3.2005% | 23.022 | 2 | MOX, 4.7%裂变钚 | 38 | 4.686% | 38.324 | 4.703% | 37.9312 | 4.6993% | 38.019 | 3 | UO2, 18%
| 27 | 17.855% | 27.328 | 18.003% | 27.9196 | 18.001% | 26.991 |
|
Table 6. Results for the determination of initial enrichment of uranium and burn-up by linear regression analysis.
利用线性回归分析进行初始装料与燃耗的鉴别分析的结果