• Acta Photonica Sinica
  • Vol. 49, Issue 1, 0111001 (2020)
Dong-xu JIANG1, Bao-yu SUN1, Ying-chun LI1,*, Jie-qiong LIN1..., Dong-xue WANG1 and Wen-pan WANG2|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Changchun University of Technology, Changchun 130012
  • 2Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130033, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/gzxb20204901.0111001 Cite this Article
    Dong-xu JIANG, Bao-yu SUN, Ying-chun LI, Jie-qiong LIN, Dong-xue WANG, Wen-pan WANG. Effect of Thermally Induced Gradient Index on Imaging Quality of Aspherical Optical System[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2020, 49(1): 0111001 Copy Citation Text show less
    机载相机三维结构Three-dimensional structure of the airborne camera
    Fig. 1. 机载相机三维结构Three-dimensional structure of the airborne camera
    镜筒有限元网格模型Finite element mesh model of the lens barrel
    Fig. 2. 镜筒有限元网格模型Finite element mesh model of the lens barrel
    开始工作时透镜温度分布Lens temperature distribution at the beginning of operation
    Fig. 3. 开始工作时透镜温度分布Lens temperature distribution at the beginning of operation
    工作10 min时透镜温度分布Lens temperature distribution at 10 min
    Fig. 4. 工作10 min时透镜温度分布Lens temperature distribution at 10 min
    工作20 min时透镜温度分布Lens temperature distribution at 20 min
    Fig. 5. 工作20 min时透镜温度分布Lens temperature distribution at 20 min
    工作30 min时透镜温度分布Lens temperature distribution at 30 min
    Fig. 6. 工作30 min时透镜温度分布Lens temperature distribution at 30 min
    工作40 min时透镜温度分布Lens temperature distribution at 40 min
    Fig. 7. 工作40 min时透镜温度分布Lens temperature distribution at 40 min
    Optical system point map design value
    Fig. 8. Optical system point map design value
    Point map fit value when starting work
    Fig. 9. Point map fit value when starting work
    Working for 10 min point map fitting value
    Fig. 10. Working for 10 min point map fitting value
    Working for 20 min point map fitting value
    Fig. 11. Working for 20 min point map fitting value
    Working for 30 min point map fitting value
    Fig. 12. Working for 30 min point map fitting value
    Working for 40 min point map fitting value
    Fig. 13. Working for 40 min point map fitting value
    MaterialConductivity/ (W·m-1·K-1)Young′s modulus/MPaDensity/(t·mm-3)Specific heat/(MJ·t-1·K-1)Poisson′s ratioExpansion/℃
    Aluminum217.76.9×1042.70×10-98.88×1070.332.40×10-5
    H-ZBAF500.678.6×1043.77×10-95.4×1080.2799.00×10-6
    H-F130.968.4×1042.69×10-98.08×1080.2319.90×10-6
    H-ZK60.838.3×1043.54×10-96.9×1080.2677.90×10-6
    H-ZK201.027.7×1043.66×10-97.6×1080.2719.00×10-6
    F20.8835.7×1043.50×10-98.58×1080.2211.20×10-5
    Table 1. Material thermal properties
    No.n0nx1nx2ny1ny2nz1nz2
    11.658 445.22×10-7-3.52×10-91.58×10-113.43×10-95.09×10-73.44×10-9
    31.625 889.54×10-7-2.09×10-95.94×10-111.18×10-81.60×10-61.18×10-8
    51.612 72-2.66×10-82.24×10-10-1.65×10-12-2.02×10-10-2.43×10-8-2.02×10-10
    71.617 2-5.07×10-82.69×10-10-7.15×10-12-6.61×10-10-6.70×10-8-6.62×10-10
    91.620 042.79×10-6-3.45×10-82.90×10-102.38×10-82.24×10-62.37×10-8
    111.658 443.05×10-6-6.89×10-8-2.13×10-119.66×10-108.29×10-89.52×10-10
    Table 2. Gradient index coefficient at the beginning of work
    No.n0nx1nx2ny1ny2nz1nz2
    11.658 444.97×10-7-3.29×10-91.33×10-112.96×10-94.39×10-72.96×10-9
    31.625 886.97×10-7-1.84×10-93.87×10-117.79×10-91.05×10-67.79×10-9
    51.612 72-1.14×10-86.51×10-11-6.27×10-13-8.86×10-11-1.07×10-8-8.85×10-11
    71.617 2-2.78×10-81.75×10-10-1.77×10-12-1.73×10-10-1.75×10-8-1.73×10-10
    91.620 041.69×10-6-2.03×10-81.50×10-101.23×10-81.17×10-61.23×10-8
    111.658 442.19×10-6-4.85×10-8-1.51×10-116.07×10-105.20×10-85.98×10-10
    Table 3. Working for 10 min gradient refractive index coefficient
    No.n0nx1nx2ny1ny2nz1nz2
    11.658 442.77×10-7-1.92×10-095.38×10-121.15×10-91.71×10-71.15×10-9
    31.625 883.78×10-7-1.52×10-091.59×10-113.16×10-94.27×10-73.16×10-9
    51.612 726.79×10-9-9.11×10-129.78×10-131.38×10-101.66×10-81.38×10-10
    71.617 2-2.43×10-82.09×10-10-3.59×10-13-3.74×10-11-3.78×10-9-3.74×10-11
    91.620 041.07×10-6-1.24×10-87.15×10-115.89×10-95.56×10-75.89×10-9
    111.658 441.25×10-6-2.65×10-8-5.89×10-122.95×10-102.53×10-82.90×10-10
    Table 4. Working for 20 min gradient refractive index coefficient
    No.n0nx1nx2ny1ny2nz1nz2
    11.658 442.27×10-7-1.32×10-94.38×10-121.00×10-91.01×10-79.12×10-10
    31.625 883.36×10-7-1.21×10-91.30×10-113.08×10-93.97×10-72.91×10-9
    51.612 726.47×10-9-7.07×10-128.37×10-131.21×10-101.36×10-81.16×10-10
    71.617 2-1.83×10-81.36×10-10-2.69×10-13-3.00×10-11-2.98×10-9-3.32×10-11
    91.620 049.73×10-7-1.01×10-86.95×10-115.01×10-095.56×10-75.13×10-9
    111.658 441.11×10-6-2.42×10-8-5.23×10-122.73×10-102.33×10-82.00×10-10
    Table 5. Working for 30 min gradient refractive index coefficient
    No.n0nx1nx2ny1ny2nz1nz2
    11.658 441.97×10-7-1.22×10-94.28×10-129.30×10-109.61×10-88.82×10-10
    31.625 883.15×10-7-1.17×10-91.16×10-112.99×10-93.87×10-72.71×10-9
    51.612 726.35×10-9-7.01×10-128.15×10-131.07×10-101.29×10-81.03×10-10
    71.617 2-1.53×10-81.23×10-10-2.55×10-13-2.86×10-11-2.57×10-9-3.20×10-11
    91.620 049.69×10-7-9.51×10-96.73×10-114.59×10-95.37×10-74.93×10-9
    111.658 441.01×10-6-2.34×10-8-5.11×10-122.67×10-102.18×10-81.50×10-10
    Table 6. Working for 40 min gradient refractive index coefficient
    Field angleRMS/μm
    DesignStart workingWroking 10 minWorking 20 minWorking 30 minWorking 40 min
    Zero-field1.4051.5381.531.5291.5341.526
    Half-field1.5271.721.7011.6871.6861.682
    Full-field2.0332.2162.22.1852.1822.180
    Table 7. Diffraction spot radius of different gradient index optical systems
    Dong-xu JIANG, Bao-yu SUN, Ying-chun LI, Jie-qiong LIN, Dong-xue WANG, Wen-pan WANG. Effect of Thermally Induced Gradient Index on Imaging Quality of Aspherical Optical System[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2020, 49(1): 0111001
    Download Citation