• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 11, Issue 12, 2210 (2023)
Liye Li1, Yifan Ouyang2, Lijun Ma1, Hongshun Sun1, Yusa Chen1, Meizhang Wu3、4, Zhimei Qi5、6, and Wengang Wu1、7、8、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Micro/Nano Fabrication, School of Integrated Circuits, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • 2School of Electronics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • 3School of Automation, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
  • 4School of Instrument Science and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing 100096, China
  • 5State Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
  • 6University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 7Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Integrated Circuits, Beijing 100871, China
  • 8Frontiers Science Center for Nano-optoelectronics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.502199 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Liye Li, Yifan Ouyang, Lijun Ma, Hongshun Sun, Yusa Chen, Meizhang Wu, Zhimei Qi, Wengang Wu. Reflection-type surface lattice resonances in all-metal metasurfaces for refractive index sensing[J]. Photonics Research, 2023, 11(12): 2210 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematics and experimental characterization of the proposed all-metal metasurface. (a) Schematic illustration of the all-metal metasurface and the coupling between the LSPR and the RA. The structural parameters are as follows: Px=Py=500 nm, lx=ly=250 nm, t1=40 nm, t2=150 nm. (b) SEM image of the fabricated metasurface. (c) Smoothness and height characterizations of the metasurface sample by the AFM.
    Fig. 1. Schematics and experimental characterization of the proposed all-metal metasurface. (a) Schematic illustration of the all-metal metasurface and the coupling between the LSPR and the RA. The structural parameters are as follows: Px=Py=500  nm, lx=ly=250  nm, t1=40  nm, t2=150  nm. (b) SEM image of the fabricated metasurface. (c) Smoothness and height characterizations of the metasurface sample by the AFM.
    Experimental and simulated results of the designed metasurface. (a) Measured and (b) numerical simulation reflection spectra of metasurfaces with different meta-atom widths of 200 nm, 250 nm, and 300 nm. Electric field Ez distribution at the SLR wavelength (514.7 nm) in the (c) x–y plane and (d) x–z plane.
    Fig. 2. Experimental and simulated results of the designed metasurface. (a) Measured and (b) numerical simulation reflection spectra of metasurfaces with different meta-atom widths of 200 nm, 250 nm, and 300 nm. Electric field Ez distribution at the SLR wavelength (514.7 nm) in the (c) xy plane and (d) xz plane.
    RI sensing results of numerical simulation and measurement. (a) Variation of simulated SLR spectra with RI environments. (b) SLR dip positions in the spectra and corresponding calculated RI sensing sensitivity. (c) Measured reflection-type SLR spectra under air (n=1.0000), deionized water (n=1.3333), anhydrous alcohol (n=1.3614), and isopropanol (n=1.3772). (d) Measured SLR dip positions, RI sensitivity, and Q-factors. (e) Numerical simulation transmission-type SLR spectra under different RI environments. (f) SLR dip positions and RI sensitivities. The orange line is composed of four line segments with different gradients, with a low linearity. The inset is the designed transmission metasurface model and the length unit is in nanometers.
    Fig. 3. RI sensing results of numerical simulation and measurement. (a) Variation of simulated SLR spectra with RI environments. (b) SLR dip positions in the spectra and corresponding calculated RI sensing sensitivity. (c) Measured reflection-type SLR spectra under air (n=1.0000), deionized water (n=1.3333), anhydrous alcohol (n=1.3614), and isopropanol (n=1.3772). (d) Measured SLR dip positions, RI sensitivity, and Q-factors. (e) Numerical simulation transmission-type SLR spectra under different RI environments. (f) SLR dip positions and RI sensitivities. The orange line is composed of four line segments with different gradients, with a low linearity. The inset is the designed transmission metasurface model and the length unit is in nanometers.
    Spectra and sensitivities of other metasurfaces. (a) Measured reflection-type SLR spectra in different RI environments and (b) RI sensitivity of the metasurface with Px=600 nm and lx=400 nm. The inset picture is the SEM image of the sample. Similarly, (c) and (d) are the reflectivity spectra, calculated RI sensitivity, and SEM image of the metasurface with Px=700 nm and lx=450 nm.
    Fig. 4. Spectra and sensitivities of other metasurfaces. (a) Measured reflection-type SLR spectra in different RI environments and (b) RI sensitivity of the metasurface with Px=600  nm and lx=400  nm. The inset picture is the SEM image of the sample. Similarly, (c) and (d) are the reflectivity spectra, calculated RI sensitivity, and SEM image of the metasurface with Px=700  nm and lx=450  nm.
    Experimental results from angular multiplexing with different polarization modes. (a) Measured reflection spectra of the TM beam in the case of different incident angles from 10° to 50° at a 10° interval. (b) Measured reflection spectra of the TE beam with different incident angles from 5° to 25° at a 5° interval. Measured SLR spectra under the different RI conditions of the (c) TM beam and (d) TE beam (θi=20°).
    Fig. 5. Experimental results from angular multiplexing with different polarization modes. (a) Measured reflection spectra of the TM beam in the case of different incident angles from 10° to 50° at a 10° interval. (b) Measured reflection spectra of the TE beam with different incident angles from 5° to 25° at a 5° interval. Measured SLR spectra under the different RI conditions of the (c) TM beam and (d) TE beam (θi=20°).
    Experimental results from a rectangular array. (a) SEM image of the all-metal metasurface with the rectangular array (Px=500 nm, Py=600 nm) and rectangular meta-atom (lx=250 nm, ly=400 nm). (b) Numerical simulation SLR spectra excited by orthogonally polarized incidences. (c), (d) Measured reflection spectra under different RI environments in the case of x- and y-polarizations, separately.
    Fig. 6. Experimental results from a rectangular array. (a) SEM image of the all-metal metasurface with the rectangular array (Px=500  nm, Py=600  nm) and rectangular meta-atom (lx=250  nm, ly=400  nm). (b) Numerical simulation SLR spectra excited by orthogonally polarized incidences. (c), (d) Measured reflection spectra under different RI environments in the case of x- and y-polarizations, separately.
    Measured and simulated spectra and SEM images of metasurfaces with the (a) hexagonal meta-atom, (b) nanohole meta-atom, (c) hexagonal array, and (d) honeycomb array. The above SLR spectra are all excited by x-polarized incidence beams.
    Fig. 7. Measured and simulated spectra and SEM images of metasurfaces with the (a) hexagonal meta-atom, (b) nanohole meta-atom, (c) hexagonal array, and (d) honeycomb array. The above SLR spectra are all excited by x-polarized incidence beams.
    (a) Theoretical calculation wavelengths of the kSPP and kRA. (b) Simulated spectra of the meta-atoms with widths of 150 nm and 100 nm.
    Fig. 8. (a) Theoretical calculation wavelengths of the kSPP and kRA. (b) Simulated spectra of the meta-atoms with widths of 150 nm and 100 nm.
    (a) Simulated reflection spectra and (b) SLR dip positions of the metasurface with Px=600 nm under different RI environments. (c) Simulated reflection spectra and (d) SLR dip positions of the metasurface with Px=700 nm under different RI environments.
    Fig. 9. (a) Simulated reflection spectra and (b) SLR dip positions of the metasurface with Px=600  nm under different RI environments. (c) Simulated reflection spectra and (d) SLR dip positions of the metasurface with Px=700  nm under different RI environments.
    (a), (b) Simulated reflection spectra and SLR dip positions of the Au metasurface under different RI environments. Inset image is the structure diagram with geometric parameters (Px=Py=650 nm, lx=ly=300 nm, t1=40 nm). (c), (d) Simulated reflection spectra and SLR wavelengths of the Ag metasurface, whose geometric parameters are as follows: Px=Py=500 nm, lx=ly=200 nm, t1=40 nm.
    Fig. 10. (a), (b) Simulated reflection spectra and SLR dip positions of the Au metasurface under different RI environments. Inset image is the structure diagram with geometric parameters (Px=Py=650  nm, lx=ly=300  nm, t1=40  nm). (c), (d) Simulated reflection spectra and SLR wavelengths of the Ag metasurface, whose geometric parameters are as follows: Px=Py=500  nm, lx=ly=200  nm, t1=40  nm.
    Schematic diagrams of the (a) TM mode incidence and (b) TE mode incidence.
    Fig. 11. Schematic diagrams of the (a) TM mode incidence and (b) TE mode incidence.
    Normalized electric field Ez distributions on the meta-atom surface in the case of (a) x-polarization and (b) y-polarization.
    Fig. 12. Normalized electric field Ez distributions on the meta-atom surface in the case of (a) x-polarization and (b) y-polarization.
    (a) SEM image of the proposed metasurface with the rectangular array (Px=500 nm and Py=700 nm) and rectangular meta-atom (lx=250 nm, ly=500 nm, and h=50 nm). (b), (c) Measured reflection spectra under different RI environments in the case of x- and y-polarizations, respectively. (d) SLR positions and corresponding RI sensitivities of both polarization states.
    Fig. 13. (a) SEM image of the proposed metasurface with the rectangular array (Px=500  nm and Py=700  nm) and rectangular meta-atom (lx=250  nm, ly=500  nm, and h=50  nm). (b), (c) Measured reflection spectra under different RI environments in the case of x- and y-polarizations, respectively. (d) SLR positions and corresponding RI sensitivities of both polarization states.
    Schematic diagrams of the (a) hexagonal array and (b) honeycomb array.
    Fig. 14. Schematic diagrams of the (a) hexagonal array and (b) honeycomb array.
    Liye Li, Yifan Ouyang, Lijun Ma, Hongshun Sun, Yusa Chen, Meizhang Wu, Zhimei Qi, Wengang Wu. Reflection-type surface lattice resonances in all-metal metasurfaces for refractive index sensing[J]. Photonics Research, 2023, 11(12): 2210
    Download Citation