• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 7, Issue 12, 1454 (2019)
Xinghua Li, Ji Wu, Siqi Xiong, Mengting Chen..., Hongye Yan, Zhiguo Wang and Yanpeng Zhang*|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • Key Laboratory for Physical Electronics and Devices of the Ministry of Education & Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Information Photonic Technique, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.7.001454 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xinghua Li, Ji Wu, Siqi Xiong, Mengting Chen, Hongye Yan, Zhiguo Wang, Yanpeng Zhang, "Spatial and frequency multimode in the dressing parametric amplified multiwave mixing process," Photonics Res. 7, 1454 (2019) Copy Citation Text show less
    (a) Experimental setup. PBS, polarized beam splitter; BS, beam splitter; M, mirror; APD, avalanche photodiode. (b) Energy diagram; (c) phase-mismatching diagram; (d) emission cone of Stokes.
    Fig. 1. (a) Experimental setup. PBS, polarized beam splitter; BS, beam splitter; M, mirror; APD, avalanche photodiode. (b) Energy diagram; (c) phase-mismatching diagram; (d) emission cone of Stokes.
    Third-order nonlinear susceptibility of Stokes and anti-Stokes signals versus frequency linewidth δ obtained from FWM; (a1), (a2) without dressing effect; (b1), (b2) with E3 field single-dressing effect; (c1), (c2) with E3 and E4 double-dressing effect; (d1), (d2) fifth-order nonlinear susceptibility versus frequency linewidth δ obtained in SWM, δ1+δ2+δ3=0.
    Fig. 2. Third-order nonlinear susceptibility of Stokes and anti-Stokes signals versus frequency linewidth δ obtained from FWM; (a1), (a2) without dressing effect; (b1), (b2) with E3 field single-dressing effect; (c1), (c2) with E3 and E4 double-dressing effect; (d1), (d2) fifth-order nonlinear susceptibility versus frequency linewidth δ obtained in SWM, δ1+δ2+δ3=0.
    (a1) In FWM process, the emission cone of Stokes signal; (a2) parametric amplified Stokes signal. The cross section of Stokes and anti-Stokes signals in FWM: (b1), (b2) without E3 laser dressing; (c1), (c2) with E3 laser dressing; (d1), (d2) with E3 and E4 lasers’ double dressing.
    Fig. 3. (a1) In FWM process, the emission cone of Stokes signal; (a2) parametric amplified Stokes signal. The cross section of Stokes and anti-Stokes signals in FWM: (b1), (b2) without E3 laser dressing; (c1), (c2) with E3 laser dressing; (d1), (d2) with E3 and E4 lasers’ double dressing.
    (a1)–(a3) Cross sections of S1, S2, and S3 signals cone in SWM with E3 and E4 lasers’ dressing; (b1)–(b3) partial enlargements of (a1), (a2), and (a3), respectively.
    Fig. 4. (a1)–(a3) Cross sections of S1, S2, and S3 signals cone in SWM with E3 and E4 lasers’ dressing; (b1)–(b3) partial enlargements of (a1), (a2), and (a3), respectively.
    In PA-FWM process, evolutions of the generated anti-Stokes signals’ spatial images captured by discretely modifying pumping frequency detuning Δ1. (a1)–(a6) Rb temperature is 55°C; (b1)–(b6) Rb temperature is 70°C; (c1)–(c6) Rb temperature is 85°C; (d1) frequency spectrum of anti-Stokes versus pumping frequency detuning Δ1 at different diameters D of pump beam E1; (d2) frequency spectrum of anti-Stokes versus external dressing laser E3 frequency detuning Δ3 at discrete Δ1.
    Fig. 5. In PA-FWM process, evolutions of the generated anti-Stokes signals’ spatial images captured by discretely modifying pumping frequency detuning Δ1. (a1)–(a6) Rb temperature is 55°C; (b1)–(b6) Rb temperature is 70°C; (c1)–(c6) Rb temperature is 85°C; (d1) frequency spectrum of anti-Stokes versus pumping frequency detuning Δ1 at different diameters D of pump beam E1; (d2) frequency spectrum of anti-Stokes versus external dressing laser E3 frequency detuning Δ3 at discrete Δ1.
    In PA-SWM process, evolutions of the generated S1 signal spatial image captured by discretely modifying pumping frequency detuning Δ1. (a1)–(a6) Rb temperature is set to 60°C; (b1)–(b6) Rb temperature is set to 80°C; (c1)–(c6) Rb temperature is set to 100°C; (d1) frequency spectrum of anti-Stokes versus pumping frequency detuning Δ1 at discrete E4 frequency detuning; (d2) frequency spectrum of anti-Stokes versus laser E3 frequency detuning Δ3 at discrete E4 frequency detuning.
    Fig. 6. In PA-SWM process, evolutions of the generated S1 signal spatial image captured by discretely modifying pumping frequency detuning Δ1. (a1)–(a6) Rb temperature is set to 60°C; (b1)–(b6) Rb temperature is set to 80°C; (c1)–(c6) Rb temperature is set to 100°C; (d1) frequency spectrum of anti-Stokes versus pumping frequency detuning Δ1 at discrete E4 frequency detuning; (d2) frequency spectrum of anti-Stokes versus laser E3 frequency detuning Δ3 at discrete E4 frequency detuning.
     FWMSFWMDFWMSWMDSWMEWM
    S1234242
    S2234482
    S3222
    S48
    Table 1. Number of Resonant Frequency Modes in MWM Process
     FWMSFWMDFWMSWMDSWMEWM
    S1234242
    S2234482
    S3222
    S48
    Table 2. Number of Central Spatial Modes for Each Signal in MWM Process
    Xinghua Li, Ji Wu, Siqi Xiong, Mengting Chen, Hongye Yan, Zhiguo Wang, Yanpeng Zhang, "Spatial and frequency multimode in the dressing parametric amplified multiwave mixing process," Photonics Res. 7, 1454 (2019)
    Download Citation