Fig. 1. Comparison of dosimetric index in PGTVnd target areas: statistical analysis (a) D2%, (b) D98%, (c) D50%, (d) Dmean, (e) CT, (f) HI in two plans
Fig. 2. Comparison of dosimetric index in CTV target areas: statistical analysis of (a) D2%, (b) D98%, (c) D50%, (d) Dmean, (e) CT, (f) HI in two plans
Fig. 3. Comparison of dosimetric index in PTV target areas: statistical analysis of (a) D2%, (b) D98%, (c) D50%, (d) Dmean, (e) CI, (f) HI in two plans
Fig. 4. Comparison of dosimetric index in femora areas: (a), (b) are statistical analysis of left femora and right femora in two plans
Fig. 5. Comparison of dosimetric index in bladder areas: statistical analysis of (a) Dmeam, (b) V30,(c) V40,(d) V50 in two plans
Fig. 6. Comparison of dosimetric index in rectum areas: statistical analysis of (a) Dmeam, (b) V30, (c) V40, (d) V50 in two plans
Fig. 7. Comparison of dosimetric index in small intestine areas: statistical analysis of (a) Dmeam, (b) V30, (c) V40, (d) V50 in two plans