• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 13, Issue 6, 1776 (2025)
Haihao Fan1,†, Qian Cao1,2,†, Xin Liu3,4,†, Andy Chong5,6, and Qiwen Zhan1,2,7,*
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
  • 2Zhangjiang Laboratory, Shanghai 201210, China
  • 3Shandong Provincial Engineering and Technical Center of Light Manipulations and Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Optics and Photonic Device, School of Physics and Electronics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China
  • 4Collaborative Innovation Center of Light Manipulations and Applications, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China
  • 5Department of Physics, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea
  • 6Institute for Future Earth, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea
  • 7Westlake Institute for Optoelectronics, Hangzhou 311400, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.555236 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Haihao Fan, Qian Cao, Xin Liu, Andy Chong, Qiwen Zhan, "Perfect spatiotemporal optical vortices," Photonics Res. 13, 1776 (2025) Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Recently, spatiotemporal optical vortices (STOVs) with transverse orbital angular momentum have emerged as a significant research topic. While various STOV fields have been explored, they often suffer from a critical limitation: the spatial and temporal dimensions of the STOV wavepacket are strongly correlated with the topological charge. This dependence hinders the simultaneous achievement of high spatial accuracy and high topological charge. To address this limitation, we theoretically and experimentally investigate a new class of STOV wavepackets generated through the spatiotemporal Fourier transform of polychromatic Bessel–Gaussian beams, which we term as perfect spatiotemporal optical vortices. Unlike conventional STOVs, perfect STOVs exhibit spatial and temporal diameters that are independent of the topological charge. Furthermore, we demonstrate the generation of spatiotemporal optical vortex lattices by colliding perfect STOV wavepackets, enabling flexible manipulation of the number and sign of sub-vortices.

    1. INTRODUCTION

    An optical vortex, characterized by a helical phase structure of the form exp(ilθ), features a central phase singularity and a hollow intensity profile. The topological charge, denoted by l, quantifies the number of phase twists accumulated during one wavelength of propagation [13]. In the early 1990s, Allen et al. demonstrated that the longitudinal orbital angular momentum (OAM) of a photon is inherently carried by a spatial vortex beam, with the magnitude of the OAM being proportional to its topological charge [4,5]. Since then, optical vortex beams carrying longitudinal OAM, including Laguerre–Gaussian beams, Bessel–Gaussian beams, and others, have been extensively demonstrated and applied in a wide range of applications, such as light–matter interactions [6,7], optical imaging [8,9], quantum information [10,11], and optical communications [12,13], as well as nonlinear optics [14,15].

    Recently, spatiotemporal optical vortices (STOVs) defined in the space-time domain have garnered increasing attention due to their ability to carry unique transverse OAM of light [1619]. The development of STOVs can be traced back to early predictions [20,21] and has recently been experimentally demonstrated through both nonlinear [22] and linear methods [23,24]. The successful generation of STOV wavepackets has catalyzed further exploration into spatiotemporal topology [25,26], harmonic generations [2729], and other forms of matter waves [30]. This progress has led to the emergence of novel spatiotemporal optical wavepackets [16,17], including spatiotemporal Bessel [31,32], crystal [33], and Laguerre and Hermite Gaussian wavepackets [34]. However, the beam radii of these conventional optical vortices—whether spatial vortex beams or STOV wavepackets—strongly depend on their topological charge number, which can hinder their applications in many cases. For instance, this dependence presents challenges in coupling STOVs into a single optical fiber for mode-division multiplexing [35,36], in the angular momentum transfer to particles for optical trapping and manipulation [37], and in the OAM-dependent divergence that accompanies the increase in the mode index for optical transmission [38].

    Consequently, the concept of perfect optical vortices has been proposed to overcome the above limitations, as their beam radius is independent of the topological charge number [39,40]. This feature introduces an unprecedented paradigm for applications in ultra-secure image encryption [41], high-dimensional quantum teleportation [42], trapping particles [43], and information encoding and transmission [38]. Very recently, Ponomarenko et al. introduced the concept of perfect space-time vortices by theoretically incorporating a time lens [44]. In this approach, a Bessel-type STOV is transformed into a perfect STOV through a sequence of an ordinary lens and a time lens. However, implementing a time lens directly in the temporal domain is very challenging, as it requires precise quadratic phase modulation on the picosecond timescale [45]. Hence, the perfect STOV has never been experimentally realized and investigated.

    In this work, we report the experimental generation of perfect spatiotemporal optical vortices, where the ring size in both space and time remains independent of the topological charge. We theoretically and experimentally demonstrate that the proposed perfect STOV wavepackets are the spatiotemporal Fourier transforms of polychromatic Bessel–Gaussian beams based on space-time duality. Experimental results are in excellent agreement with theoretical predictions. Furthermore, we show that the spatiotemporal collision of two perfect STOVs produces STOV lattices, where the number of sub-vortices and symbols can be freely controlled.

    2. THEORETICAL ANALYSIS AND NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS

    The perfect STOV wavepacket in the spatiotemporal domain (XT) can be generated by modulating the spatial–spectral field in the kxω plane. Assume the optical field in the kxω domain is given by ψ0(ρ,ϕ), where (ρ,ϕ) are the corresponding polar coordinates, ρ=kx2+γ2ω2, φ=arctan(kx/γω), and γ is a scaling factor with a unit of ps/mm for controlling the aspect ratio of Bessel–Gaussian mode at the kxω plane. After applying a spiral phase of eilφ, a two-dimensional (2D) Fourier transform yields the field in the XT domain, which can be expressed as ψ(r,θ)=FT{ψ0(ρ,φ)eilφ},where r=X2+α2T2, θ=arctan(X/αT), and α=γ1 is the scaling factor in the spatiotemporal domain. FT represents the 2D Fourier transform. The spiral phase and its related optical OAM are conserved after a 2D Fourier transform from the spatial frequency–frequency domain (kxω plane) to the space–time domain (XT plane) [23].

    In the spatial domain, spatially perfect vortex beams can be generated through the Fourier transform of spatial Bessel beams [46]. Motivated by this, the perfect STOV can be generated by the Bessel Gaussian mode spatial frequency–frequency domain (kxω plane) through the 2D spatiotemporal Fourier transform. In the experiment, we can implement the 2D spatiotemporal Fourier transform process by a 2D 4f pulse shaper with a focusing lens. Hence, we introduce a spatial–spectral coupled polychromatic Bessel–Gaussian beam on the kxω plane, which is given by [46] ψ(ρ,φ)=exp(ρ2w02)Jl(aρ)eilφ,where w0 is the waist radius of the Bessel–Gaussian beam on the kxω plane. Jl is the first kind Bessel function with an order of l. a is the radial wavevector of the Bessel–Gaussian beam, which determines the size of the Bessel–Gaussian beam. In the experiment, this parameter is applied to define the radius of the phase pattern in the computer-generated hologram. eilφ is the spiral phase in the spatial–spectral plane. In the experiment, the Fourier spectral field in Eq. (2) can be generated through a recently developed spatiotemporal holographic shaping method that can generate the complex amplitude field distribution with the amplitude distribution being exp(ρ2w02)Jl(aρ) and the phase distribution being eilφ. The resulting spatiotemporal field on the XT plane can be then calculated by a 2D Fourier transform [32,46]: ψ(r,θ)=FT{ψ(ρ,φ)}=12π02π0exp(ρ2w02)Jl(aρ)eilφeiρr·cos(φθ)ρdρdϕil1w0wexp((rr0)2w2)eilθ.

    The above equation represents the complex amplitude of perfect STOV with topological charge of l and ring radius r0=af/k0. In the spatiotemporal domain, the perfect STOV ring thickness is w=2f/k0w0, where f is the focal length of a focusing lens performing a spatial Fourier transform, k0=2π/λ, and λ is the wavelength. It can be seen that the ring size of a perfect STOV is independent of the topological charge and can be adjusted by changing a and f.

    Equations (1)–(3) suggest that perfect STOV can be synthesized via spatiotemporal Fourier transform by employing a spatiotemporally coupled polychromatic Bessel–Gaussian seed beam. Figures 1(a)–1(d) present the numerical simulation results for the generation of perfect STOV wavepackets at different free-space propagation distances. The simulation uses a spatial–spectral Bessel–Gaussian beam with a topological charge of l=+5, a spatial width of 0.7 mm, a central wavelength of 1.03 μm, and a spectral width of 10 THz. A perfect STOV wavepacket [Fig. 1(d)] is faithfully generated at a distance L=300  mm following a 4f pulse shaper. On the other hand, in a medium with anomalous dispersion, the perfect STOV exists only within a finite propagation distance, beyond which it degrades into a Bessel–Gaussian form (see Fig. 5 in Appendix A).

    Perfect spatiotemporal optical vortex (STOV) wavepackets. (a)–(d) 3D iso-intensity profiles of a perfect STOV of l=+5 and corresponding sliced phase patterns (at y=0) at different locations L=75, 150, 225, and 300 mm after the spatiotemporal pulse shaper. (e) Comparison of spatiotemporal Laguerre–Gaussian wavepackets (STLG), spatiotemporal Bessel–Gaussian wavepackets (STBG), and perfect STOV with topological charge l=+1,+5, +10.

    Figure 1.Perfect spatiotemporal optical vortex (STOV) wavepackets. (a)–(d) 3D iso-intensity profiles of a perfect STOV of l=+5 and corresponding sliced phase patterns (at y=0) at different locations L=75, 150, 225, and 300 mm after the spatiotemporal pulse shaper. (e) Comparison of spatiotemporal Laguerre–Gaussian wavepackets (STLG), spatiotemporal Bessel–Gaussian wavepackets (STBG), and perfect STOV with topological charge l=+1,+5, +10.

    Previous research has demonstrated the generation of spatiotemporal Laguerre–Gaussian and spatiotemporal Bessel–Gaussian wavepackets, where the spatial and temporal diameters are dependent on the topological charge [31,32,34,47]. As shown in Fig. 1(e), numerical simulations reveal that the spatial and temporal widths of spatiotemporal Laguerre–Gaussian and spatiotemporal Bessel–Gaussian wavepackets increase with increasing topological charge. In contrast, the spatial and temporal diameters of perfect STOV wavepackets remain constant, regardless of the topological charge. This is one of the main features and advantages of perfect STOVs.

    3. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP

    Figure 2 exhibits the experimental setup for perfect STOV generation and characterization. The mode-locked input laser, with a spectral bandwidth of approximately 20 nm centered at 1030 nm, is split into a probe pulse and an object pulse. The probe pulse passes through a pulse compressor consisting of a pair of parallel gratings and a right-angle prism and is then de-chirped to a Fourier-transform-limited pulse. The object pulse is directed into a folded 2D ultrafast pulse shaper that consists of a reflective grating, a cylindrical lens, and a phase-only reflective SLM (Holoeye GAEA-2, 3840×2160  pixels with a pitch of 3.74 μm). The programmable SLM is positioned in the spatial–spectral plane and imprints an intricate phase pattern, as shown in the bottom right corner. This pattern encodes the complex amplitude of the polychrome Bessel–Gaussian beam described in Eq. (2), which has a form of [33,34] ψ(x,ω)=mod(Arg(ψBG)+gx·asinc(1|ψBG|)+π·asinc(|ψBG|),2π),where ψBG is the complex amplitude of the Bessel–Gaussian beam and g denotes the frequency of a linear phase ramp, the depth of which is contingent upon the modulus of the on-demand mode. Furthermore, to suppress the residual modulation, the phase-only SLM must be calibrated to a linear 2π phase response over all 256 gray levels at wavelength 1030 nm. To produce high quality perfect STOV wavepackets, the pulsed beam’s spatial–spectral bandwidths should entirely cover the Bessel–Gaussian pattern loaded on the SLM. Hence, the spatial–spectral bandwidths of input pulsed beam and the spatial resolution of the SLM (or phase hologram) jointly impose a limitation on the generation of ultrahigh-order perfect STOV wavepackets. This limitation could be mitigated by utilizing customized metasurface devices and lasers with larger spatial and spectral width [34].

    Experimental setup for synthesizing and characterizing perfect STOV wavepackets. The setup includes three sections: a holographic pulse shaper, a time delay line system for fully measuring the 3D profile of the generated perfect STOV wavepacket, and a pulse compressor system. The computer-generated hologram (CGH) embedded on the SLM comprises two parts of the phase: (1) the phase distribution of a spatial–spectral Bessel–Gaussian mode; (2) a phase-only diffraction grating for controlling the spatial–spectral amplitude modulation. M, mirror; BS, beam splitter; CL, cylindrical lens.

    Figure 2.Experimental setup for synthesizing and characterizing perfect STOV wavepackets. The setup includes three sections: a holographic pulse shaper, a time delay line system for fully measuring the 3D profile of the generated perfect STOV wavepacket, and a pulse compressor system. The computer-generated hologram (CGH) embedded on the SLM comprises two parts of the phase: (1) the phase distribution of a spatial–spectral Bessel–Gaussian mode; (2) a phase-only diffraction grating for controlling the spatial–spectral amplitude modulation. M, mirror; BS, beam splitter; CL, cylindrical lens.

    The modulated beam is reflected and recombined, then it is focused by a spherical lens (f=1.2  m), and the perfect STOV wavepackets are obtained at the focal plane where a CCD camera is positioned. The spatiotemporal wavepacket is synthesized in the far field via a time-delayed spatial propagation after the grating. To characterize the wavepacket, the probe and generated wavepacket are recombined at the CCD camera with a small tilt angle. Scanning the probe pulse’s time delay enables the reconstruction of the object wavepacket’s spatiotemporal profile at a certain temporal slice from the delay-dependent fringes. Finally, we can reconstruct the three-dimensional spatiotemporal wavepacket by stitching all temporal slices [34].

    4. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    Figure 3(a) presents the intensity iso-surface and sliced phase patterns of experimentally generated perfect STOV wavepackets with typical topological charges of l=+1,+5, and +10, respectively. The size of the perfect STOV remains constant in space–time coordinates. To quantitatively assess the properties of perfect STOVs, Fig. 3(c) plots the variation of spatial (wx, circle marker) and temporal (wt, square marker) diameters as a function of the topological charge. The experimental data (circles and squares) align well with the theoretical predictions (solid curves), confirming that the spatial and temporal diameters of perfect STOVs are indeed independent of the topological charge. This experimental verification solidifies the characteristics of perfect STOV wavepackets (see Fig. 6 in Appendix B).

    Theoretical and experimental results for the generated perfect STOV wavepacket and its comparison with the spatiotemporal Laguerre–Gaussian wavepacket. (a) and (b) Reconstructed intensity iso-surface and sliced phases (y=0 plane) of generated perfect STOVs and spatiotemporal Laguerre–Gaussian wavepackets with topological charge l=+1,+5,+10, respectively. (c) and (d) Dependence of the spatial (temporal) diameter on the topological charge of the generated perfect STOVs and spatiotemporal Laguerre–Gaussian wavepackets.

    Figure 3.Theoretical and experimental results for the generated perfect STOV wavepacket and its comparison with the spatiotemporal Laguerre–Gaussian wavepacket. (a) and (b) Reconstructed intensity iso-surface and sliced phases (y=0 plane) of generated perfect STOVs and spatiotemporal Laguerre–Gaussian wavepackets with topological charge l=+1,+5,+10, respectively. (c) and (d) Dependence of the spatial (temporal) diameter on the topological charge of the generated perfect STOVs and spatiotemporal Laguerre–Gaussian wavepackets.

    To evaluate the performance of perfect STOVs, we conducted an experimental comparison with single-ring spatiotemporal Laguerre–Gaussian beams [34] of p=0. Using identical beam parameters and topological charge numbers (l=+1,+5,+10), we generated spatiotemporal Laguerre–Gaussian wavepackets with p=0. The spatial and temporal diameters of the spatiotemporal Laguerre–Gaussian wavepackets increase significantly with larger topological charge, as shown in Fig. 3(b). As seen in Fig. 3(d), there is excellent agreement between the experimental data (represented by circles and squares) and the theoretical results (solid curves). These results demonstrate that both the spatial and temporal diameters increase with increasing topological charges (see Fig. 7 in Appendix B).

    The properties of the perfect STOV wavepackets are further verified by comparing with those of spatiotemporal Laguerre–Gaussian wavepackets. In addition to their unique characteristics of constant sizes, perfect STOVs could offer additional degrees of freedom in controlling their spatial and temporal dimensions. By adjusting the parameter a in Eq. (2), we can freely regulate both the spatial and temporal diameters of perfect STOV wavepackets. To illustrate the advantages of “perfect” in the spatiotemporal domain, we examined two cases, following the method outlined in Ref. [47], where two perfect STOVs with applied linear phase coefficients kt=1.5  ps and kt=+1.5  ps move in opposite directions along the time axis.

    In the first case, as shown in Figs. 4(a1) and 4(a2), the initial two perfect STOV wavepackets separated in time are generated first by applying linear phases with opposite slopes to perfect STOV wavepackets with the same spatial and temporal diameters (a1=a2=5  mm1) and l1=+4 and l2=2. Then, we accelerate and delay the two wavepackets to 0 ps, respectively, in time, so that the two wavepackets collide in the spatiotemporal domain, forming a petal-like interference pattern, as shown in Fig. 4(b1), and the number of petals is N=|l2l1|. In the second case, Figs. 4(d) and 4(f) show two perfect STOV wavepackets of different spatial and temporal diameters (a3=4  mm1 and a4=6  mm1) and l3=+4 and l4=2. When these two perfect STOV wavepackets collide completely [Fig. 4(e1)], it is clear that there are some dark dots at the contact point of the two perfect STOV wavepackets. As shown in Fig. 4(e2), the phase pattern of the superposition of the two perfect STOV wavepackets shows that a spatiotemporal optical vortex with l=1 exists at each dark dot. The number of spatiotemporal phase singularity is N=|l4l3|. Furthermore, their signs are easily determined by the sign of N=l4l3. Therefore, the collision of these two perfect STOV wavepackets with different spatial and temporal diameters leads to the generation of an STOV lattice with controllable numbers and signs of vortices. Therefore, the perfect property and radial degrees of freedom of perfect STOV wavepackets can be used to flexibly generate richer and more complex spatiotemporal structure light fields.

    Spatiotemporal collision of perfect STOVs with time-varying transverse OAM. (a1)–(c1) Measured iso-intensity profile of the collision of two perfect STOVs with the same spatial and temporal diameters and different topological charges of l1=+4,l2=−2. (a2)–(c2) Retrieved phase distribution in the meridional plane corresponding to (a1)–(c1). (d1)–(f1) Measured iso-intensity profile of the collision of two perfect STOVs with different spatial and temporal diameters and different topological charges of l3=+4,l4=−2. (d2)–(f2) Retrieved phase distribution in the meridional plane corresponding to (d1)–(f1). Linear phases along the spectral direction with opposite signs are applied on the left/right side of the input light field to advance/delay input wavepackets in the corresponding time domain. The phase is expressed as φ(ω)=kt(ω−ω0). From (a) to (c) [(d) to (f)], the linear phase coefficient kt changes from −1.5 ps to 1.5 ps. The arrow direction indicates the direction in which the perfect STOV is shifted in the time domain.

    Figure 4.Spatiotemporal collision of perfect STOVs with time-varying transverse OAM. (a1)–(c1) Measured iso-intensity profile of the collision of two perfect STOVs with the same spatial and temporal diameters and different topological charges of l1=+4,l2=2. (a2)–(c2) Retrieved phase distribution in the meridional plane corresponding to (a1)–(c1). (d1)–(f1) Measured iso-intensity profile of the collision of two perfect STOVs with different spatial and temporal diameters and different topological charges of l3=+4,l4=2. (d2)–(f2) Retrieved phase distribution in the meridional plane corresponding to (d1)–(f1). Linear phases along the spectral direction with opposite signs are applied on the left/right side of the input light field to advance/delay input wavepackets in the corresponding time domain. The phase is expressed as φ(ω)=kt(ωω0). From (a) to (c) [(d) to (f)], the linear phase coefficient kt changes from 1.5  ps to 1.5 ps. The arrow direction indicates the direction in which the perfect STOV is shifted in the time domain.

    Compared with other methods using different parameters for controlling the radius of the vortex ring [48] or using the combination of conical and helical phase for generating perfect STOVs [49], our method has the advantage of rigorously satisfying the spatiotemporal Fourier transform conditions both mathematically and physically while having a much simpler and straightforward experimental configuration. This is achieved by the spatiotemporal holographic shaping method to modulate the complex spatiotemporal optical field [33].

    5. CONCLUSION

    In conclusion, a perfect spatiotemporal optical vortex with spatiotemporal sizes independent of the topological charges is generated experimentally by the spatiotemporal Fourier transform of the polychrome Bessel–Gaussian beam. The properties of the perfect STOVs are verified through comparison with spatiotemporal Laguerre–Gaussian wavepackets. Furthermore, we show the spatiotemporal collision of two perfect STOV wavepackets by introducing a linear phase in the time dimension, where the spatiotemporal collision of two perfect STOVs with different diameters leads to the phenomenon of spatiotemporal vortex reconnection, resulting in STOV lattices consisting of spatiotemporal sub-vortices with a controllable number and sign. These perfect spatiotemporal optical vortices may be used to facilitate optical communications, particle trapping, and tweezing among other potential applications.

    APPENDIX A: NUMERICAL PROPAGATION OF PERFECT STOV WAVEPACKETS IN THE ANOMALOUS DISPERSIVE MEDIUM

    The spatiotemporal evolution dynamics of a wavepacket propagating in a dispersive medium can be numerically studied by the angular spectrum propagation theorem by means of the fast Fourier transformation method, given by [34,50,51] Ψ(t,x,y,z)=eik0z8π3Ψ˜(Ω,kx,ky)H(Ω,kx,ky)exp(ikxxikyyiΩt)dΩdkxdky,where H(Ω,kx,ky)=exp(i(kx2+ky2)z/2)exp(iβ2Ω2z/2) is the transfer function of the dispersive medium and Ψ˜(Ω,kx,ky) is the two-dimensional Fourier transform of Ψ(t,x,y)eik0(x2+y2)/2L, where the latter exponential term is to eliminate the residual spatial diffraction during the synthesis process. kx and ky are spatial frequencies in x and y directions. β2 is the group velocity dispersion coefficient of the dispersive medium. Figure 5 shows the numerical simulation results of the generated perfect STOV wavepacket propagating in an anomalous dispersive medium of β2=164  fs2/mm at different propagation distances. As shown in Fig. 5, perfect STOV wavepackets exist only within a limited distance in the abnormal dispersion medium, and perfect STOV wavepackets will evolve into spatiotemporal Bessel–Gaussian wavepackets when they are transmitted over a longer distance.

    Numerical simulation for the spatiotemporal evolution dynamics of the generated perfect STOV wavepacket of l=+5 in an anomalous dispersive medium of β2=−164 fs2/mm. z0=πw02/λ≈60 mm in this case.

    Figure 5.Numerical simulation for the spatiotemporal evolution dynamics of the generated perfect STOV wavepacket of l=+5 in an anomalous dispersive medium of β2=164  fs2/mm. z0=πw02/λ60  mm in this case.

    APPENDIX B: SPATIOTEMPORAL INTENSITY AND PHASE DISTRIBUTIONS OF THE PERFECT STOV AND SPATIOTEMPORAL LAGUERRE–GAUSSIAN WAVEPACKETS

    Figure 6 shows the experimental reconstruction intensity and phase of perfect STOVs with topological charges l from 1 to 10. It can be seen that the size of the perfect STOVs remains constant as the topological charge increases in space–time coordinates. Figure 7 shows the experimental reconstructed intensity and phase of spatiotemporal Laguerre–Gaussian wavepackets with p=0 and topological charges l from 1 to 10. It can be seen that the size of the spatiotemporal Laguerre–Gaussian wavepackets increase significantly with larger topological charge.

    Reconstructed intensities and phases of generated perfect STOVs with different l.

    Figure 6.Reconstructed intensities and phases of generated perfect STOVs with different l.

    Reconstructed intensities and phases of generated spatiotemporal Laguerre–Gaussian wavepackets with p=0 and different l.

    Figure 7.Reconstructed intensities and phases of generated spatiotemporal Laguerre–Gaussian wavepackets with p=0 and different l.

    References

    [1] Y. Shen, X. Wang, Z. Xie. Optical vortices 30 years on: OAM manipulation from topological charge to multiple singularities. Light Sci. Appl., 8, 90(2019).

    [2] J. Wang, K. Li, Z. Quan. Integrated structured light manipulation. Photonics Insights, 3, R05(2024).

    [3] C. He, Y. Shen, A. Forbes. Towards higher-dimensional structured light. Light Sci. Appl., 11, 205(2022).

    [4] L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. C. Spreeuw. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes. Phys. Rev. A, 45, 8185-8189(1992).

    [5] L. Allen, M. J. Padgett, M. Babiker. IV. The orbital angular momentum of light. Prog. Opt., 39, 291-372(1999).

    [6] Y. Yang, Y.-X. Ren, M. Chen. Optical trapping with structured light: a review. Adv. Photonics, 3, 034001(2021).

    [7] M. Padgett, R. Bowman. Tweezers with a twist. Nat. Photonics, 5, 343-348(2011).

    [8] X. Fang, H. Ren, M. Gu. Orbital angular momentum holography for high-security encryption. Nat. Photonics, 14, 102-108(2020).

    [9] M. Pascucci, G. Tessier, V. Emiliani. Superresolution imaging of optical vortices in a speckle pattern. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 093904(2016).

    [10] A. Nicolas, L. Veissier, L. Giner. A quantum memory for orbital angular momentum photonic qubits. Nat. Photonics, 8, 234-238(2014).

    [11] A. Forbes, I. Nape. Quantum mechanics with patterns of light: progress in high dimensional and multidimensional entanglement with structured light. AVS Quantum Sci., 1, 011701(2019).

    [12] J. Wang, J.-Y. Yang, I. M. Fazal. Terabit free-space data transmission employing orbital angular momentum multiplexing. Nat. Photonics, 6, 488-496(2012).

    [13] T. Lei, M. Zhang, Y. Li. Massive individual orbital angular momentum channels for multiplexing enabled by Dammann gratings. Light Sci. Appl., 4, e257(2015).

    [14] X. Zhang, B. Shen, Y. Shi. Generation of intense high-order vortex harmonics. Phys. Rev. Lett., 114, 173901(2015).

    [15] B. Pinheiro Da Silva, G. H. Dos Santos, A. G. De Oliveira. Observation of a triangular-lattice pattern in nonlinear wave mixing with optical vortices. Optica, 9, 908-912(2022).

    [16] Q. Zhan. Spatiotemporal sculpturing of light: a tutorial. Adv. Opt. Photonics, 16, 163-228(2024).

    [17] X. Liu, Q. Cao, Q. Zhan. Spatiotemporal optical wavepackets: from concepts to applications. Photonics Insights, 3, R08(2024).

    [18] Y. Shen, Q. Zhan, L. G. Wright. Roadmap on spatiotemporal light fields. J. Opt., 25, 093001(2023).

    [19] R. Wang, B. Ying, S. Shi. Hybrid electromagnetic toroidal vortices. Sci. Adv., 11, eads4797(2025).

    [20] A. P. Sukhorukov, V. V. Yangirova. Spatio-temporal vortices: properties, generation and recording. Proc. SPIE, 5949, 594906(2005).

    [21] N. Dror, B. A. Malomed. Symmetric and asymmetric solitons and vortices in linearly coupled two-dimensional waveguides with the cubic-quintic nonlinearity. Phys. D, 240, 526-541(2011).

    [22] N. Jhajj, I. Larkin, E. W. Rosenthal. Spatiotemporal optical vortices. Phys. Rev. X, 6, 031037(2016).

    [23] A. Chong, C. Wan, J. Chen. Generation of spatiotemporal optical vortices with controllable transverse orbital angular momentum. Nat. Photonics, 14, 350-354(2020).

    [24] S. W. Hancock, S. Zahedpour, A. Goffin. Free-space propagation of spatiotemporal optical vortices. Optica, 6, 1547-1553(2019).

    [25] C. Wan, Y. Shen, A. Chong. Scalar optical hopfions. eLight, 2, 22(2022).

    [26] J. Zhong, C. Wan, Q. Zhan. Optical twisted phase strips. ACS Photonics, 10, 3384-3389(2023).

    [27] S. W. Hancock, S. Zahedpour, H. M. Milchberg. Second-harmonic generation of spatiotemporal optical vortices and conservation of orbital angular momentum. Optica, 8, 594-597(2021).

    [28] G. Gui, N. J. Brooks, H. C. Kapteyn. Second-harmonic generation and the conservation of spatiotemporal orbital angular momentum of light. Nat. Photonics, 15, 608-613(2021).

    [29] Y. Fang, S. Lu, Y. Liu. Controlling photon transverse orbital angular momentum in high harmonic generation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 127, 273901(2021).

    [30] K. Y. Bliokh. Orbital angular momentum of optical, acoustic, and quantum-mechanical spatiotemporal vortex pulses. Phys. Rev. A, 107, L031501(2023).

    [31] Q. Cao, J. Chen, K. Lu. Non-spreading Bessel spatiotemporal optical vortices. Sci. Bull., 67, 133-140(2022).

    [32] W. Chen, W. Zhang, Y. Liu. Time diffraction-free transverse orbital angular momentum beams. Nat. Commun., 13, 4021(2022).

    [33] Q. Cao, N. Zhang, A. Chong. Spatiotemporal hologram. Nat Commun, 15, 7821(2024).

    [34] X. Liu, Q. Cao, N. Zhang. Spatiotemporal optical vortices with controllable radial and azimuthal quantum numbers. Nat. Commun., 15, 5435(2024).

    [35] H. Yan, E. Zhang, B. Zhao. Free-space propagation of guided optical vortices excited in an annular core fiber. Opt. Express, 20, 17904-17915(2012).

    [36] Q. Cao, Z. Chen, C. Zhang. Propagation of transverse photonic orbital angular momentum through few-mode fiber. Adv. Photonics, 5, 036002(2023).

    [37] H.-S. Chai, L.-G. Wang. Improvement of optical trapping effect by using the focused high-order Laguerre–Gaussian beams. Micron, 43, 887-892(2012).

    [38] W. Yan, Y. Gao, Z. Yuan. Energy-flow-reversing dynamics in vortex beams: OAM-independent propagation and enhanced resilience. Optica, 11, 531-541(2024).

    [39] A. S. Ostrovsky, C. Rickenstorff-Parrao, V. Arrizón. Generation of the ‘perfect’ optical vortex using a liquid-crystal spatial light modulator. Opt. Lett., 38, 534-536(2013).

    [40] J. García-García, C. Rickenstorff-Parrao, R. Ramos-García. Simple technique for generating the perfect optical vortex. Opt. Lett., 39, 5305-5308(2014).

    [41] Q. Yang, Z. Xie, M. Zhang. Ultra-secure optical encryption based on tightly focused perfect optical vortex beams. Nanophotonics, 11, 1063-1070(2022).

    [42] X. Qiu, H. Guo, L. Chen. Remote transport of high-dimensional orbital angular momentum states and ghost images via spatial-mode-engineered frequency conversion. Nat. Commun., 14, 8244(2023).

    [43] M. Chen, M. Mazilu, Y. Arita. Dynamics of microparticles trapped in a perfect vortex beam. Opt. Lett., 38, 4919-4922(2013).

    [44] S. A. Ponomarenko, D. Hebri. Perfect space–time vortices. Opt. Lett., 49, 4322-4325(2024).

    [45] B. H. Kolner, M. Nazarathy. Temporal imaging with a time lens. Opt. Lett., 14, 630-632(1989).

    [46] P. Vaity, L. Rusch. Perfect vortex beam: Fourier transformation of a Bessel beam. Opt. Lett., 40, 597-600(2015).

    [47] X. Liu, C. Liang, Q. Cao. Ultrafast bursts of tailored spatiotemporal vortex pulses. arXiv(2024).

    [48] G. Vallone. Role of beam waist in Laguerre–Gauss expansion of vortex beams. Opt. Lett., 42, 1097-1100(2017).

    [49] S. Zhang, Z. Zhou, Z. Man. Controllable perfect spatiotemporal optical vortices. arXiv(2025).

    [50] G. P. Agrawal. Nonlinear Fiber Optics(2012).

    [51] J. D. Schmidt. Numerical Simulation of Optical Wave Propagation with Examples in MATLAB(2010).