Abstract
Keywords
1. Introduction
The free-electron laser (FEL) FLASH at DESY, Hamburg, Germany was the first vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) to soft x-ray FEL worldwide, starting with regular user operation in 2005[
FLASH emerged from the TESLA Test Facility (TTF), a test bed for superconducting accelerating technology[
With a major reconstruction finished in 2003, the TTF facility has been transformed into a FEL user facility named FLASH[
Sign up for High Power Laser Science and Engineering TOC. Get the latest issue of High Power Laser Science and Engineering delivered right to you!Sign up now
2. SASE FELs
FLASH is a SASE FEL. The word SASE is an abbreviation for self-amplified spontaneous emission. The SASE process is a high-gain narrow-band amplification of spontaneous undulator radiation.
The SASE process was first described by Kondratenko and Saldin[
The high-gain amplification of spontaneous radiation is obtained with only one pass through a long undulator until saturation is reached. With the SASE scheme, transversely coherent laser-like radiation with femtosecond pulse durations and unprecedented brilliance in the wavelength range from the VUV, to the extreme ultraviolet (EUV), soft and hard x-ray radiation has been made possible.
There are four main challenges in the realization of x-ray FELs: first, a suitable ultra-high brightness electron source; second, a compression scheme to obtain electron bunches with high peak current of the order of 1 kA or more and at the same time small energy spread below 0.1%, together with a low emittance below ; third, acceleration to the GeV energy scale; and fourth, precise undulator devices of several tens of meters in length, providing a high-precision undulating magnetic field (field homogeneity below 0.1%).
Today, four FEL facilities, FERMI@Elletra, Italy[
FERMI@Elletra’s specialty is seeding of the SASE process with an external ultraviolet laser.
Worldwide, many other soft- and hard x-ray FELs are under construction, such as the European XFEL located at DESY, Germany[
Many articles and books have been published on free-electron lasers. An excellent introduction to ultraviolet and soft x-ray FELs is given in the book by Schmüser
3. Description of the facility
FLASH can be divided into five basic sections: the electron source, the linac to accelerate the electron bunches, bunch compressors to provide high peak currents, the undulator systems to produce the FEL radiation, and finally several end-stations to use the radiation for research purposes.
Since 2014, FLASH has acquired a second undulator beamline, called FLASH2[
Electron beam | ||
Energy range | GeV | 0.35–1.25 |
Peak current | kA | 2.5 |
Bunch charge | nC | 0.06–1 |
Emittance (rms), norm. | 1.4 | |
Energy spread (rms) | keV | 200 |
RF pulse length | 800 | |
Number of bunches/train | 1–800 | |
Repetition rate | Hz | 10 |
Bunch separation | 1–25 | |
Undulator | ||
Type | Planar, fixed gap | |
Period | mm | 27.3 |
Gap | mm | 12 |
Peak magnetic field | T | 0.48 |
K | 1.23 | |
Segment length | m | 4.5 |
Number of segments | 6 | |
Average -function | m | 10 |
FEL radiation delivered to experiments | ||
(user runs 2014/2015) | ||
Wavelength (fundamental) | nm | 52–4.2 |
Average single-pulse energy | 10–500 | |
Pulse duration (FWHM) | fs | 50–200 |
Bandwidth (FWHM) | % | 0.3–2.0 |
Peak power | GW | 1–3 |
Photons per pulse | ||
Photon pulses per second | 10–5000 | |
Peak spectral brilliance | * | |
Av. spectral brilliance | * |
Table 1. Basic FLASH electron and photon beam parameters.
FLASH uses 1.3 GHz TESLA superconducting accelerating technology[
These long RF pulses allow the acceleration of many electron bunches within one RF pulse, so-called bursts or pulse trains. Usually, in one RF pulse, a maximum of 800 bunches with a spacing are accelerated to up to 1.25 GeV.
3.1. Electron source
As in most x-ray FEL facilities, FLASH uses a laser-driven RF-gun-based photoinjector[
Most challenging for a free-electron laser is the requirement on the transverse projected emittance, together with a high peak current and small energy spread. As an example, a peak current 2.5 kA is achieved with a bunch length of and a charge of 1 nC. Even after compression, the emittance of the lasing slice should be small, as a rough estimate below . A technical solution is the RF-gun introduced by Fraser
The FLASH photoinjector operates a 1 1/2-cell normal conducting 1.3 GHz L-band copper gun cavity powered by a 10 MW klystron, pulsed at 10 Hz with a RF pulse duration of up to . Figure
The RF-gun is operated with a RF power of 4.5 MW fed into the standing wave gun cavity by a longitudinal RF coupler. This corresponds to a maximum field at the cathode of . A RF-window separates the gun vacuum from the pressured air waveguide system. Although the design allows a RF pulse length of up to , we usually operate the gun at and 10 Hz to increase its lifetime. The average RF power is 25 kW. The RF-gun has no tuning paddles and no field pick-ups in the cavity. The gun is kept in tune at 1.3 GHz by controlling its temperature. The cooling water system achieves a long-term temperature stability of (rms). The zero to pi-mode separation is 5 MHz. This is larger than the bandwidth of the klystron. A low-level RF system based on the MTCA.4 standard keeps the amplitude and phase flat over the whole pulse length[
A solenoid provides a focusing field of 180 mT to reduce the space-charge-induced emittance growth. The beam is then injected into the first superconducting accelerating module within a distance of 2.9 m from the cathode, optimized for smallest emittance. The solenoid field, laser spot size, and launch phase are carefully chosen to optimize beam properties. The measured projected normalized transverse rms emittance for a 1 nC bunch after acceleration to 150 MeV is smaller than the design value of [
The photocathode is a thin film of with a diameter of 5 mm deposited on a molybdenum plug[
The dark current emitted from the RF-gun is usually below for nominal operation parameters and is largely collimated by a kicker-collimation system at the gun exit, where the beam energy is still small (5.3 MeV).
FLASHhas threedrive lasers.Two of themare almost identical and are usually used to run the FLASH1 or FLASH2 beamlines. The third one has a variable pulse duration for ultra-short single-spike lasing experiments[
At a reduced repetition rate of 5 Hz, within burst rates of 3 MHz are possible as well, thus increasing the number of pulses per burst to 2400.
The laser uses the relay-imaging technique with hard-edge spatial filtering. The laser overfills a hard-edge aperture, which is imaged onto the cathode. This yields to a transverse almost flat cut-Gaussian profile. Different aperture sizes can be used; we usually run the 1.2 mm diameter aperture for charges between 300 and 500 pC.
FLASH operates with bunch charges between a few pC and 1.2 nC, depending on the required properties of the SASE radiation. Usually, lower bunch charges are chosen for short photon pulses. The operable charge range is mainly limited by the dynamic range of diagnostics and instrumentation.
3.2. Acceleration
FLASH uses TESLA-type superconducting accelerating modules. Each module consists of eight 1 m long 9-cell standing wave solid niobium cavities with a fundamental mode frequency of 1.3 GHz (Figure
The length of a module is 12 m, including a quadrupole doublet, two dipole correctors, and a beam position monitor. With a total of seven modules, FLASH reaches a beam energy of 1.25 GeV, including off-crest acceleration for bunch compression. A refurbishment with new modules having high-performance cavities to increase the energy to 1.4 GeV or more is foreseen in the years to come.
The beam from the RF-gun is immediately accelerated by one module (called ACC1) to 160 MeV. This module is fed by its own 5 MW klystron with the special feature to operate the first four cavities with reduced power. Module ACC1 is followed by a module with four third-harmonic cavities operated at 3.9 GHz. They are used to linearize the longitudinal phase space required for efficient bunch compression. A voltage of up to 21 MV can be applied, the deceleration is . Figure
A dedicated low-level RF system stabilizes and flattens the amplitude and phase of the accelerating fields. The vector sum of all 16 cavities connected to one RF station is calculated and stabilized. It uses sophisticated feedback and learning feedforward techniques. An excellent overview on the stabilization of the vector sum of the amplitude and phase of several cavities driven by one klystron can be found in Ref. [
Recently, a modern system based on the MTCA.4 technology has been brought into operation[
Due to the bunch compressor chicane with an of , the very small remaining energy jitter translated into an excellent arrival time rms jitter of only 30 fs[
3.3. Bunch compression
Due to strong space-charge forces at low electron energies, it is not possible to produce bunches with a peak current exceeding 100 A directly at the source. But even for relatively small charge densities, space-charge forces may induce a growth of the projected transverse emittance. The bunch length exiting the RF-gun is for a charge of 1 nC, long enough to reduce space-charge forces to an acceptable level. Since the space-charge forces scale with , compression of bunches to the kA-scale is applied at high beam energies. ( the normalized electron beam energy : , with the electron mass, and the speed of light.)
To mitigate strong space-charge effects at lower energies and large induced energy spread at higher energies, FLASH uses two magnetic chicane bunch compressors, at beam energies of 150 and 450 MeV, with of 180 and 43 mm, respectively. Compression of relativistic electron bunches is obtained in magnetic chicanes using an energy chirp along the bunch obtained by off-crest acceleration. Due to the cosine form of the accelerating field, the chirp needs to be linearized before compression. For this, FLASH uses the four superconducting cavities installed upstream of the first compressor. They operate at 3.9 GHz, the third harmonic of 1.3 GHz. Apart from linearizing the longitudinal phase space, a proper adjustment of phase and amplitude of the cavities in the chirping modules together with the third-harmonic module allow a flexible adjustment of the compression. To a certain extent, tailoring of the bunch length and shape is possible.
For smaller charges, a stronger compression can be applied without spoiling the bunch due to space-charge effects. For example, at 1 nC, the bunch is first compressed by the first chicane to and then down to (sigma) by the second chicane, achieving a peak current of 2.5 kA and a FEL pulse duration of 150 fs (FWHM). At a reduced charge of, for example, 0.2 nC, 50 fs or less can be realized.
The electron bunch duration is measured with a resolution of a few femtoseconds by frequency-domain spectroscopy of coherent transition radiation in the terahertz range[
3.4. Undulators
The FLASH1 beamline has six fixed-gap undulator segments with lengths of 4.5 m each. The undulators consist of a periodic structure of permanent NdFeB magnets with a gap of 12 mm. The peak magnetic field is 0.47 T, the undulator period 27.3 mm, and the -value 1.23 (). An excellent field quality has been achieved, the field is almost purely sinusoidal. The contributions from odd harmonics are very small, below 0.1% (third) and below 0.05% (fifth).
Between the six undulators, high-resolution beam-position monitors, wire scanners to measure the transverse beam profile, and a quadrupole doublet to maintain a constant beta function of about 10 m are installed.
The fundamental wavelength for radiation of a planar undulator in the forward direction is given by
An important consequence of Equation (
In practice, with beam energies between 350 MeV and 1.25 GeV, lasing at wavelengths between 52 and 4.1 nm is achieved with the FLASH1 fixed-gap undulators. The third, and sometimes the fifth, harmonics of the fundamental wavelength are also used for experiments.
3.5. Photon diagnostics
The undulator is followed by a photon diagnostics section and a photon beamline to transport the FEL radiation to the experimental hall, where the user experiments are located. A comprehensive overview of the FLASH photon diagnostics is given in Ref. [
The transverse size and position of the photon beam are measured with Ce:YAG screen monitors. The energies of the FEL radiation pulses are measured with absolutely calibrated gas-monitor detectors (GMDs)[
The FEL radiation spectrum is measured by high-resolution spectrometers. Online, non-destructive spectrometers are also available.
3.6. Transverse coherence
SASE radiation is expected to have a high degree of transverse coherence. Measurements at FLASH at a wavelength of 13.7 nm with a double-slit system show an almost full transverse coherence[
It is important to mention that, in deep saturation, higher modes gain in energy with respect to the fundamental mode, with the consequence of a reduced transverse coherence. For a more detailed discussion on coherence properties the reader is referred to Saldin
3.7. Coherence time and pulse duration
Other important properties of SASE radiation are the spectral content, the coherence time and pulse duration.
The stochastic nature of the SASE process is responsible for the intrinsic fluctuation of the energy and wavelength spectra of the amplified FEL radiation.
Figure
Within one coherence time all electrons radiate in phase, resulting in a temporally coherent ‘spike’. Due to the slippage effect (the radiated photons travel faster than the electrons), many spikes build up along the electron bunch, with a random phase relationship between them[
At FLASH, a first estimate of the coherence time at a wavelength of 13.7 nm was deduced from experimental data to be a few femtoseconds: [
Several direct measurements of the coherence time have been carried out at FLASH with a split-and-delay autocorrelation experiment[
There have also been several experiments to measure the photon pulse duration. As an example, the split-and-delay autocorrelator was used together with two-photon double ionization of He as a nonlinear medium. Figure
Another measurement of the pulse duration at FLASH at a wavelength of 13.5 nm gives a pulse duration of (FWHM)[
Recently, a series of experiments have been carried out at FLASH to measure the photon pulse duration and the electron bunch length at the same time via nine different methods[
4. FLASH operation
FLASH is a user facility. The first call for user experiments has been launched in 2005. The facility hosts many experiments, ranging from atomic physics through materials science to biology.
FLASH provides 4500 h beamtime per year for external user experiments. User experiments are overbooked by a factor of three to four. The beam can only be served for one experiment at a given time. In addition, 2250 h of beamtime is used to prepare user experiments, and for photon beamline and accelerator related studies to improve the performance of the facility. Part of the beamtime is dedicated to general accelerator-related research and development (750 h). This includes testing beam instrumentation and other equipment for the European XFEL. FLASH has also been a test bed for the International Linear Collider Project.
User experiments are schedules in blocks of four weeks. The two or three weeks time between the blocks is used to swap the experiments and to prepare the beamlines for the next experiments. Part of the time is also used for the studies described above.
In a typical week, two or three experiments are served with beam alternating from day to day. As a consequence, the wavelength at FLASH is often changed on a day to day basis. As described in Section
With the construction of the second beamline FLASH2, we will be able to double the available beamtime, and to ease wavelength tuning by providing variable gap undulators.
5. The new undulator beamline FLASH2
FLASH2, the second undulator beamline, was constructed between late 2011 and early 2014[
The main features of FLASH2 are to double the available beamtime for experiments, to provide more flexibility with variable gap undulators, and – at a later stage – to include seeding options. A second experimental hall completes the beamline, with space for up to seven experimental stations.
The new beamline makes full use of the existing accelerator of FLASH. Part of the bunch train is extracted after acceleration from the main accelerator at a shallow angle of [
Figure
Both beamlines are thus operated with the repetition rate of the accelerator, essentially doubling the available beamtime.
5.1. Simultaneous operation of FLASH1 and FLASH2
Even though FLASH is able to deliver several hundred photon pulses in one pulse train to experiments with a repetition rate of 10 Hz, not all users fully use this feature. In practice, about half of the users request long pulse trains for their experiments, whereas the others ask for a single pulse or a few pulses only. Therefore, it is hardly a limitation to deliver a beam to two users simultaneously with one user receiving only single bunch or a few bunches, provided that all other parameters can be chosen as flexibly as possible. Table
Electron beam | ||
Energy range | GeV | 0.5–1.25 |
Peak current | kA | 2.5 |
Bunch charge | nC | 0.02–1 |
Emittance (rms), norm. | 1.4 | |
Energy spread (rms) | keV | 500 |
Number of bunches/train | 1–800 | |
Repetition rate | Hz | 10 |
Bunch separation | 1–25 | |
Undulator | ||
Type | Planar, variable gap | |
Period | mm | 31.4 |
K | 0.7–2.8 | |
Segment length | m | 2.5 |
Number of segments | 12 | |
Average -function | m | 6 |
Expected SASE properties | ||
Wavelength (fundamental) | nm | 60–4 |
Average single-pulse energy | 10–500 | |
Pulse duration (FWHM) | fs | 50–200 |
Bandwidth (FWHM) | % | 0.7–2.0 |
Peak power | GW | 1–3 |
Photons per pulse | ||
Photon pulses per second | 10–7500 | |
Peak spectral brilliance | * | |
Av. spectral brilliance | * |
Table 2. Expected parameters for FLASH2.
The obvious parameter which needs to be independent for both experiments is the wavelength. Therefore, the FLASH2 undulator has a variable gap, with which the wavelength can be tuned by roughly a factor of four for each beam energy. The correct undulator gap is set by measuring the electron beam energy and automatically setting the gap for the desired wavelength.
A second important parameter needed by the users is the pulse duration of the photon pulse. In order to achieve this, the charge needs to be different for both undulators and the compression must be different as well. A different charge is achieved by using two different injector lasers. This also ensures that different numbers of bunches and different bunch separations can be set easily as well. Because these bunch trains have different space charges, to realize different bunch lengths, each sub-train requires a different compression scheme. This is done by adjusting the RF amplitude and phase of each RF station separately for each sub-train. Figure
Tests have shown that changes in all RF stations are needed, even though one might expect that only changes are needed at lower energy and those stations where the beam is compressed. In fact, in practice we have seen that also a slight deviation in energy is necessary to obtain optimal performance for both beamlines.
Examples for lasing at FLASH1 and FLASH2 are shown in Figure
References
[3] D. A. EdwardsTESLA Test Facility Linac, Design Report DESY Internal Report (TESLA 199501, 1995).
[9] S. Schreiber. Proceedings of 33rd International Free Electron Laser Conference (FEL2011).
[10] H. Edwards, T. Arkan, M. Ge, E. Harms, A. Hocker, T. Khabiboulline, M. McGee, D. Mitchell, D. Olis, N. Solyak, M. Foley, A. Rowe. Proceedings of 23rd Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC09).
[11] H. Edwards, C. Behrens, E. Harms. Proceedings of 25th Linear Accelerator Conference (LINAC2010).
[12] K. Honkavaara, B. Faatz, J. Feldhaus, S. Schreiber, R. Treusch, M. Vogt. Proceedings of 36th International Free Electron Laser Conference (FEL2014).
[13] S. Schreiber, B. Faatz. Proceedings of 36th International Free Electron Laser Conference (FEL2014).
[14] B. Faatz, S. Schreiber. Synch. Rad. News, 27, 37(2014).
[15] A. M. Kondratenko, E. L. Saldin. Part. Accel., 10, 207(1980).
[16] Y. S. Derbenev, A.M. Kondratenko, E. L. Saldin. Nucl. Instrum. Methods, 193, 415(1982).
[17] R. Bonifacio, C. Pellegrini, L. M. Narducci. Opt. Commun., 50, 373(1984).
[18] J. B. Murphy, C. Pellegrini. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 237, 159(1985).
[19] J. B. Murphy, C. Pellegrini. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. B, 2, 259(1985).
[20] K.-J. Kim. Phys. Rev. Lett., 57, 1871(1986).
[21] K.-J. Kim. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 250, 396(1986).
[22] C. Pellegrini. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 272, 364(1988).
[24] http://www.elettra.trieste.it/FERMI/index.php?n=Main.CDRdocument
[25] S. Di Mitri, E. M. Allaria, P. Cinquegrana, P. Craievich, M. Danailov, A. Demidovich, G. De Ninno, B. Diviacco, W. Fawley, L. Froehlich, L. Giannessi, R. Ivanov, M. Musardo, I. Nikolov, G. Penco, P. Sigalotti, S. Spampinati, C. Spezzani, M. Trovò, M. Veronese. Proc. SPIE, 8078(2011).
[27] P. Emma. Proceedings of 23rd Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC 09).
[29] http://xfel.riken.jp/eng/pdf/XFELeng.pdf
[30] T. Tanaka, T. ShintakeSCSS X-FEL Conceptual Design Report.
[31] . Lasing achieved at SACLA, Japans X-ray free electron laser facility, J. Synch. Rad., 18, 686(2011).
[35] H. H. Braun. Proceedings of 34th International Free-Electron Laser Conference (FEL2012).
[36] H.-S. Kang, K. W. Kim, I. S. Ko. Proceedings of 5th International Particle Accelerator Conference (IPAC2014).
[37] J. N. Galayda. Proceedings of 5th International Particle Accelerator Conference (IPAC2014).
[38] P. Schmüser, M. Dohlus, J. Rossbach. Ultraviolet and Soft X-Ray Free-Electron Lasers: Introduction to Physical Principles, Experimental Results, Technological Challenges, 229(2008).
[39] E. L. Saldin, E. A. Schneidmiller, M. V. Yurkov. The Physics of Free Electron Lasers(2000).
[40] S. Schreiber. Rev. Accl. Sci. Tech., 03, 93(2010).
[41] S. Schreiber, A. Brahme. Comprehensive Biomedical Physics, 8, 127-151(2014).
[44] J. S. Fraser, R. L. Sheffield, E. R. Gray. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 250, 71(1986).
[45] M. Hoffmann, L. Butkowski, C. Schmidt, H. Schlarb, W. Koehler, A. Piotrowski, I. Rutkowski, R. Rybaniec. Proceedings of 5th International Particle Accelerator Conference (IPAC2014).
[46] C. Schmidt, V. Ayvazyan, J. Branlard, L. Butkowski, M. Grecki, M. Hoffmann, F. Ludwig, U. Mavric, S. Pfeiffer, K. Przygoda, H. Schlarb, H. Weddig, B. Yang, K. Czuba, I. Rutkowski, D. Sikora, M. Zukocinski, W. Cichalewski, D. Makowski, A. Piotrowski, M. Kudla, K. Oliwa, W. Wierba. Proceedings of 5th International Particle Accelerator Conference (IPAC2014).
[47] F. Loehl, S. Schreiber, M. Castellano, G. Di Pirro, L. Catani, A. Cianchi, K. Honkavaara. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams, 9(2006).
[50] J. Roensch-Schulenburg, E. Hass, N. M. Lockmann, T. Plath, M. Rehders, J. Rossbach, G. Brenner, S. Dziarzhytski, T. Golz, H. Schlarb, B. Schmidt, E. Schneidmiller, S. Schreiber, B. Steffen, N. Stojanovic, S. Wunderlich, M. Yurkov. Proceedings of 36th International Free Electron Laser Conference (FEL2014).
[51] I. Will, H. Templin, S. Schreiber, W. Sandner. Opt. Express, 19, 23770(2011).
[52] T. Schilcher.
[53] F. Loehl, V. Arsov, M. Felber, K. Hacker, W. Jalmuzna, B. Lorbeer, F. Ludwig, K.-H. Matthiesen, H. Schlarb, B. Schmidt, P. Schmueser, S. Schulz, J. Szewinski, A. Winter, J. Zemella. Phys. Rev. Lett., 104(2010).
[54] M. K. Bock, T. Lamb, M. Bousonville, M. Felber, P. Gessler, H. Schlarb, B. Schmidt, S. Schulz, M. Kuntzsch. Proceedings of 33rd International Free Electron Laser Conference (FEL2011).
[55] C. Schmidt, M. K. Bock, S. Pfeiffer, H. Schlarb, W. Koprek, W. Jalmuzna. Proceedings of 33rd International Free Electron Laser Conference (FEL2011).
[56] C. Behrens, N. Gerasimova, Ch. Gerth, B. Schmidt, E. A. Schneidmiller, S. Serkez, S. Wesch, M. V. Yurkov. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams, 15(2012).
[57] K. Tiedtke, A. Azima, N. von Bargen, L. Bittner, S. Bonfigt, S. Duesterer, B. Faatz, U. Fruehling, M. Gensch, Ch. Gerth, N. Guerassimova, U. Hahn, T. Hans, M. Hesse, K. Honkavaara, U. Jastrow, P. Juranic, S. Kapitzki, B. Keitel, T. Kracht, M. Kuhlmann, W. B. Li, M. Martins, T. Nunez, E. Ploenjes, H. Redlin, E. L. Saldin, E. A. Schneidmiller, J. R. Schneider, S. Schreiber, N. Stojanovic, F. Tavella, S. Toleikis, R. Treusch, H. Weigelt, M. Wellhoefer, H. Wabnitz, M. V. Yurkov, J. Feldhaus. New J. Phys., 11(2009).
[59] K. Tiedtke, J. Feldhaus, U. Hahn, U. Jastrow, T. Nunez, T. Tschentscher, S. V. Bobashev, A. A. Sorokin, J. B. Hastings, S. Moeller, L. Cibik, A. Gottwald, A. Hoehl, U. Kroth, M. Krumrey, H. Schoeppe, G. Ulm, M. Richter. J. Appl. Phys., 103(2008).
[62] E. L. Saldin, E. A. Schneidmiller, M. V. Yurkov. Opt. Commun., 281, 1179(2008).
[63] E. A. Schneidmiller, M. V. Yurkov.
[64] E. L. Saldin, E. A. Schneidmiller, M. V. Yurkov. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 429, 233(1999).
[69] S. Düsterer, M. Rehders, A. Al-Shemmary, C. Behrens, G. Brenner, O. Brovko, M. DellAngela, M. Drescher, B. Faatz, J. Feldhaus, U. Frühling, N. Gerasimova, N. Gerken, C. Gerth, T. Golz, A. Grebentsov, E. Hass, K. Honkavaara, V. Kocharian, M. Kurka, Th. Limberg, R. Mitzner, R. Moshammer, E. Plönjes, M. Richter, J. Rönsch-Schulenburg, A. Rudenko, H. Schlarb, B. Schmidt, A. Senftleben, E. A. Schneidmiller, B. Siemer, F. Sorgenfrei, A. A. Sorokin, N. Stojanovic, K. Tiedtke, R. Treusch, M. Vogt, M. Wieland, W. Wurth, S. Wesch, M. Yan, M. V. Yurkov, H. Zacharias, S. Schreiber. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams, 17(2014).
[70] V. Ayvazyan, N. Baboi, V. Balandin, W. Decking, S. Duesterer, H.-J. Eckoldt, B. Faatz, M. Felber, J. Feldhaus, N. Golubeva, K. Honkavaara, M. Koerfer, T. Laarmann, A. Leuschner, L. Lilje, T. Limberg, D. Noelle, F. Obier, A. Petrov, E. Ploenjes, K. Rehlich, H. Schlarb, B. Schmidt, M. Schmitz, S. Schreiber, H. Schulte-Schrepping, J. Spengler, M. Staack, K. Tiedtke, M. Tischer, R. Treusch, M. Vogt, H. C. Weddig, J. Bahrdt, R. Follath, K. Holldack, A. Meseck, R. Mitzner, M. Drescher, A. Hage, V. Miltchev, R. Riedel, J. Roensch-Schulenburg, J. Rossbach, M. Schulz, A. Willner, F. Tavella, M. Gensch, B. Liu, J. Chen, H. Deng. Proceedings of 33rd International Free Electron Laser Conference (FEL2011).
[71] M. Scholz, B. Faatz, M. Vogt, J. Zemella. Proceedings of 36th International Free Electron Laser Conference (FEL2014).
Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address