• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 14, Issue 2, 021601 (2016)
Shuai Ye, Jun Song*, Dong Wang, Yuliang Tian, Junle Qu**, and Hanben Niu
Author Affiliations
  • Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and Systems of Guangdong Province, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL201614.021601 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Shuai Ye, Jun Song, Dong Wang, Yuliang Tian, Junle Qu, Hanben Niu. Reduced photon quenching in Ce-doped NaYF4:Yb/Ho upconversion nanoparticles with core/shell structure[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2016, 14(2): 021601 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    The use of red light or near-infrared radiation as a luminescent probe for in vivo bio imaging is crucial in order to restrict the strong absorption of short-wavelength light below 600 nm in tissue. It is demonstrated that the emission color of Yb/Ho codoped NaYF4 nanoparticles can be tuned from green to red by incorporating Ce3+ ions. However, compared with that of the NaYF4:Yb/Ho nanoparticles, the photoluminescence intensity of the Ce3+-tridoped NaYF4:Yb/Ho nanoparticles is drastically reduced. In this work, Ce3+-incorporated core/shell NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5% nanoparticles are prepared. A strong red emission and a high-intensity ratio between the red emission and green emission are obtained in these upconversion nanoparticles. The emission intensity increases by a factor higher than 120 when compared with that of the NaYF4:Yb/Ho/Ce nanoparticles. This result indicates that the Ce3+ incorporation into the

    Due to their interesting properties, including absence of autofluorescence, low photobleaching, strong penetration abilities, low toxicity, etc., rare-earth-doped upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) have attracted increasing interest[15]. These special features provide UCNPs with a great potential for applications in several fields, such as solar cells, solid-state lasers, boilables, and imaging[610]. In particular, among the various applications, in vivo imaging based on UCNPs is expected to be a promising photoluminescence imaging technique, as it provides high sensitivity and spatial resolution, leading to predictive models for potential clinical applications[11,12]. For in vivo imaging, long-wavelength light (above 600 nm) is necessary as the luminescent probe, as the tissue strongly absorbs light with a short wavelength (below 600 nm)[13]. However, three of the most important types of UCNPs, i.e., Yb/Er-, Yb/Tm-, and Yb/Ho-codoped NaYF4 nanoparticles, radiate green, blue, and green light, respectively[1418].

    Presently, most of the research on red-emission UCNPs mainly focuses on the Yb/Er-codoped NaYF4 nanoparticles, as they show a strong green emission (550nm) along with a weak dark-red emission (660nm). The color can be tuned from green to red using different methods: controlling the particle’s size or the Yb concentration[1922], changing the surface ligands[23,24], partially replacing the Y site of the lattice by Mn2+ or Zr4+ ions[2530], etc. Similar to the Yb/Er-codoped NaYF4 nanoparticles, the Yb/Ho-codoped NaYF4 nanoparticles also show a strong green emission and a weak red emission, and it is possible to tune the emission color from green to red using different methods. Unfortunately, the tuning seems very hard to achieve. Until now, only one method has been reported to successfully tune the emission color from green to red in Yb/Ho-codoped NaYF4 nanoparticles by incorporating Ce3+ ions and inducing a cross-relaxation process between the Ho3+ and Ce3+ ions[3133]. However, a significant quenching effect due to the Ce incorporation was simultaneously produced, and the upconversion (UC) photoluminescence intensity of the NaYF4:Yb3+, Ho3+ 1%, Ce3+ 15% nanoparticles was several orders of magnitude lower than that of the NaYF4:Yb3+, Ho3+ 1% nanoparticles.

    In our previous research, core/shell structured NaYF4:Yb3+ at NaYF4:Ho3+1% nanoparticles were proven to enhance the red emission by increasing the Yb3+ concentration in the core[34]. Here, the Ce3+ ions were incorporated into the core/shell structured NaYF4:Yb3+@NaYF4:Ho3+ nanoparticles to further enhance the red emission; in addition, a method to eliminate the quenching effect is proposed.

    Two types of NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5% nanoparticles with incorporated Ce3+ ions were prepared to investigate the influence of the Ce3+ ions. In addition, NaYF4:Yb3+ 20%, Ho3+ 0.5% and NaYF4:Yb3+ 20%, Ho3+ 0.5%, Ce3+ 20% nanoparticles were also prepared as the contrastive samples. All samples were prepared by the procedure descripted in our previous work[34]. Figure 1 shows the typical transmission electron microscopy morphologies of such nanoparticles. The mono-dispersed NaYF4:Yb3+ 20%, Ho3+ 0.5%, Ce3+ 20% nanospheres exhibited an average size of 24nm, similar to that of the conventional NaYF4:Yb3+ 20%, Ho3+ 0.5% nanospheres, revealing that the Ce3+ incorporation had a minimal effect on the nanoparticle morphology and size. The NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5% nanoparticles exhibited a hexagonal shape with an average size of 55nm. The larger size of these nanoparticles was mainly due to the high Yb3+ concentration in the core. The two types of Ce3+-incorporated NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5% nanoparticles were also hexagonal and showed a similar size to the NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5% nanoparticles. The selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns of the NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5%, Ce3+20% nanoparticles confirmed their hexagonal shape with crystallographic phases belonging to the standard hexagonal NaYF4 host lattice (JCPDS 28-1192). All the results indicated that the Ce3+ incorporation in the NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5% nanoparticles did not affect the microstructure, morphology, or size, as in the case of the NaYF4:Yb3+ 20%, Ho3+ 1% nanoparticles.

    Transmission electron microscopy morphologies of (a) NaYF4:Yb3+ 20%, Ho3+ 1%, (b) NaYF4:Yb3+ 20%, Ho3+ 0.5%, Ce3+ 20%, (c) NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5%, (d) NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5%@NaYF4:Ce3+20%, (e) NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5%, Ce3+20% nanoparticles (the insets show the size distribution of the corresponding nanoparticles), and (f) SAED pattern of NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+1%:Ce3+20% nanoparticles.

    Figure 1.Transmission electron microscopy morphologies of (a) NaYF4:Yb3+ 20%, Ho3+ 1%, (b) NaYF4:Yb3+ 20%, Ho3+ 0.5%, Ce3+ 20%, (c) NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5%, (d) NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5%@NaYF4:Ce3+20%, (e) NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5%, Ce3+20% nanoparticles (the insets show the size distribution of the corresponding nanoparticles), and (f) SAED pattern of NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+1%:Ce3+20% nanoparticles.

    The photoluminescence spectra of the nanoparticles, with and without incorporated Ce3+, were measured using a 980 nm laser excitation, as shown in Fig. 2. The photoluminescence intensity of NaYF4:Yb3+ 20%, Ho3+ 1%, Ce3+ 20% was reduced by 97%, although the IRed/IGreen ratio was enhanced from 0.9 to 7 compared with that of the NaYF4:Yb3+ 20%, Ho3+ 1% nanoparticles (Fig. 2(a)). This result revealed a strong quenching effect in the nanoparticles due to the Ce3+ incorporation. However, a slight effect of the Ce3+ incorporation on the emission intensity was observed in the NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5% nanoparticles, as shown in Fig. 2(b). Compared with the NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5% nanoparticles without incorporated Ce3+, the photoluminescence intensity of the NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5% nanoparticles shelled by NaYF4:Ce3+ 20% was reduced by 8%, and the IRed/IGreen ratio was approximately equal to 7, slightly higher than that of the NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5% nanoparticles. This result indicated that an enhancement of the red emission of the NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5% nanoparticles was not achievable by only coating them with a Ce3+-contained shell layer. When the Ce3+ ions were incorporated into the shell of the NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5%, Ce3+20% nanoparticles, the IRed/IGreen ratio was enhanced to 11, nearly twice that of the NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5% nanoparticles, although the photoluminescence intensity was also reduced by 22%. However, the emission intensity of the NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5%, Ce3+20% nanoparticles was enhanced by a factor of more than 120 compared with that of the NaYF4:Yb3+ 50%, Ho3+ 1%, Ce3+ 20% nanoparticles. These results demonstrated the weak quenching effect that exists in the NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5%, Ce3+20% nanoparticles.

    Photoluminescence spectra of different types of Ce3+ ion incorporations: (a) NaYF4:Yb3+ 20%, Ho3+ 1% and (b) NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5% nanoparticles. (c) Photoluminescence intensity of the green and red emission bands. (d) The intensity ratios from the nanoparticles in (a) and (b).

    Figure 2.Photoluminescence spectra of different types of Ce3+ ion incorporations: (a) NaYF4:Yb3+ 20%, Ho3+ 1% and (b) NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5% nanoparticles. (c) Photoluminescence intensity of the green and red emission bands. (d) The intensity ratios from the nanoparticles in (a) and (b).

    The dependence of the intensities of the green and the red UC emission band on the pump power for the NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5%, Ce3+20% UCNPs was measured, as shown in Fig. 3. In general, the photoluminescence intensity increased on the pump laser power and obeyed the rule of IUCLpn, where IUCL is the photoluminescence intensity, p is the pump laser power, and n is the number of laser photons required. The slope values for the green and the red emission bands of the NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5%, Ce3+20% UCNPs approached 2, indicating that both the green and the red emissions involve a two-photon process for their generations. The slope values were in good agreement with previous results on Yb3+/Ho3+-codoped UCNPs[32,34].

    Logarithmic plot of the dependence of the intensities of the green and the red UC emission bands on the pump power for the NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+1%, Ce3+20% UCNPs.

    Figure 3.Logarithmic plot of the dependence of the intensities of the green and the red UC emission bands on the pump power for the NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+1%, Ce3+20% UCNPs.

    High emission intensity was observed in the core/shell nanoparticles consisting of a core containing Yb3+ ions and a shell containing Ho3+ and Ce3+ ions. This result implied that the strong quenching effect in the Yb/Ho/Ce-tridoped NaYF4 nanoparticles may be related to the interaction between the Yb3+ and Ce3+ ions. To verify and provide a theoretical background to this hypothesis, the steady-state rate equations were used. In this physical model, NYb0 and NYb1 are the population densities of the Yb3+ ions in the ground and the excited states, respectively; N0, N1, N2, N3, and N4 are the population densities of the I85, I75, I65, F55, and S25/F54 states, respectively, of the Ho3+ ions; and NCe0 and NCe1 are the population densities of the Ce3+ ions in the ground and the excited states, respectively. In addition, W0, W1, and W2 are the energy transfer rates from the excited Yb3+ ions to the Ho3+ ions, and R1, R2, R3, and R4 are the radiation rates of the energy states of the Ho3+ ions. β1 and β2 are the phonon-assisted nonradiative relaxation rates from the I65 to I75 and from the S25/F54 to F55 states, respectively, of the Ho3+ ions; C2 and C4 are the coefficients of the cross relaxations between Ho3+ and Ce3+ ions in the I65 and S25/F54 states, respectively; and M is the coefficient of the cross relaxation between the Yb3+ and Ce3+ ions. I is the laser intensity at 980 nm, ν is the laser frequency, σYb is the absorption cross section of the Yb3+ ion, R is the radiation rate of the excited state of Yb3+, and RCe is the radiation rate of the excited state of Ce3+. The steady-state rate equations for the discussed system can be described as follows: After solving Eqs. (1) and (2), we obtained the following expressions: N1=[(β1+C2NCe0)W0N0R1(β1+C2NCe0+R2)W1R1]NYb1,N2=W0N0β1+C2NCe0+R2+W2NYb1NYb1,N3=[(β1+C2NCe0)W1R1+W1NYb1+(β2+C4NCe0)W2R4+C4NCe0+β2]W0N0(NYb1)2(R2+β1+C2NCe0+W2NYb1)R3,N4=W0W2N0(NYb1)2(R4+C4NCe0+β2)(R2+C2NCe0+β1+W2NYb1),NYb1=IσYbNYb0hν(RYb+W0N0+W1N1+W2N2+MNCe0),NCe0=RCeNCe1C2N2+C4N4+MNYb1.Then, we can obtain the intensities of the red and green lights by applying the following equations: Ir=N3hνrR3,Ig=N4hνgR4,where νr and νg are the frequencies of the red light and green light, respectively. Furthermore, by combining Eqs. (5), (6), (9), and (10), we can derive the following expressions: Ir=[(β1+C2NCe0)W1R1+W1NYb1+(β2+C4NCe0)W2R4+C4NCe0+β2]W0N0(NYb1)2(R2+β1+C2NCe0+W2NYb1)hνr,Ig=R4W0W2N0(NYb1)2(R4+C4NCe0+β2)(R2+C2NCe0+β1+W2NYb1)hνg.

    According to Eqs. (7) and (8), we know that NYb1,NCe011+M.

    Moreover, considering Eqs. (11) and (12), we can also obtain the following expressions: Ir1(1+M)2[R2+β1+C2(1+M)+W2(1+M)],Ig1[(R4+β2)(1+M)+C4][(R2+β1)(1+M)+C2+W2].

    Hence, from Eqs. (14) and (15), it was demonstrated that both the intensities of the red and green lights decrease by the coefficient M of the cross relaxation between Yb3+ and Ce3+ ions, although the two cross relaxations between Ho3+ and Ce3+ ions can lead to an enhancement of the red light radiation by reducing the green light radiation, as shown in Fig. 4(b). This model is able to explain the low emission intensity of the Yb/Ho/Ce-tridoped NaYF4 nanoparticles. When the Ho3+ and Ce3+ ions were moved to the shell layer, as shown in Fig. 4(c), the cross relaxation between the Yb3+ and Ce3+ ions could be reduced drastically as a result of the extended distance between the Yb3+ and Ce3+ ions, while the cross relaxation between the Ho3+ and Ce3+ ions was kept constant. Thus, high-intensity red light radiation was obtained for the NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5%, Ce3+20% nanoparticles. The 22% reduction of the NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5%, Ce3+20% nanoparticles, compared with that of the NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5% nanoparticles (Fig. 2), mainly resulted from the cross relaxation between the Yb3+ and Ce3+ ions at the core/shell interface. The 8% reduction of the NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5%@NaYF4:Ce3+20% nanoparticles indicated that the quenching effect was further reduced by extending the distance between the Yb3+ and Ce3+ ions.

    (a) Energy level diagrams of Ho3+, Yb3+, and Ce3+ ions and proposed UC mechanisms. (b) Schematic illustration of the proposed energy-transfer mechanisms in NaYF4:Yb/Ho/Ce nanoparticles. (c) Schematic illustration of the proposed energy-transfer mechanisms in core/shell NaYF4:Yb@NaYF4:Ho/Ce nanoparticles.

    Figure 4.(a) Energy level diagrams of Ho3+, Yb3+, and Ce3+ ions and proposed UC mechanisms. (b) Schematic illustration of the proposed energy-transfer mechanisms in NaYF4:Yb/Ho/Ce nanoparticles. (c) Schematic illustration of the proposed energy-transfer mechanisms in core/shell NaYF4:Yb@NaYF4:Ho/Ce nanoparticles.

    In conclusion, the Ce3+ ions are incorporated into the Yb/Ho-codoped NaYF4 nanoparticles to enhance the red emission. The Ce3+ incorporation enhances the intensity ratio between the red emission and the green emission of the NaYF4:Yb/Ho nanoparticles, but largely reduces the total photoluminescence intensity. However, when the Ce3+ ions are incorporated into the shell of the core/shell NaYF4:Yb3+50%@NaYF4:Ho3+0.5% nanoparticles, the emission intensity is also enhanced by a factor of more than 120 compared with that of the NaYF4:Yb/Ho/Ce nanoparticles. This result indicates that the Ce3+ incorporation into the NaYF4;Yb/Ho nanoparticles promotes a strong quenching effect that reduces the emission intensity; the quenching effect is significantly reduced by incorporating the Ce3+ ions into the core/shell structured Yb/Ho codoped NaYF4 nanoparticles. A theoretical model is proposed to explain the quenching effect existing in the NaYF4:Yb/Ho/Ce nanoparticles, revealing that the quenching is mainly related to the interaction between the Yb3+ ions and the Ce3+ ions.

    References

    [1] S. Gai, C. Li, P. Yang, J. Lin. Chem. Rev., 114, 2343(2014).

    [2] F. Huang, X. Liu, W. Li, L. Hu, D. Chen. Chin. Opt. Lett., 12, 051601(2014).

    [3] J. Shen, L. Zhao, G. Han. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 65, 744(2013).

    [4] G. Chen, H. Ågren, T. Ohulchanskyya, P. N. Prasad. Chem. Soc. Rev., 44, 1680(2015).

    [5] X. Yu, L. Chen, M. Li, M. Xie, L. Zhou, Y. Li, Q. Wang. Adv. Mater., 20, 4118(2008).

    [6] G. Chen, J. Seo, C. Yang, P. N. Prasad. Chem. Soc. Rev., 42, 8304(2013).

    [7] L. Zhou, Z. Li, Z. Liu, M. Yin, J. Ren, X. Qu. Nanoscale, 6, 1445(2014).

    [8] R. Lei, H. Wang, S. Xu, Y. Tian, L. Huang. Chin. Opt. Lett., 2, 021602(2015).

    [9] G. Chen, T. Y. Ohulchanskyy, S. Liu, W. C. Law, F. Wu, M. T. Swihart, H. Agren, P. N. Prasad. ACS Nano, 6, 2969(2012).

    [10] J. Liu, W. Bu, L. Pan, J. Shi. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 52, 4375(2013).

    [11] Y. Zhou, S. T. Han, X. Chen, F. Wang, Y. B. Tang, V. Roy. Nat. Commun., 4, 1(2014).

    [12] K. Koenig. J. Microscopy, 200, 83(2000).

    [13] A. Xia, M. Chen, Y. Gao, D. Wu, W. Feng, F. Li. Biomaterials, 33, 5394(2012).

    [14] J. Boyer, F. Vetrone, L. A. Cuccia, J. A. Capobianco. J. Am. Chen. Soc., 128, 7444(2006).

    [15] S. Heer, K. Kompe, H. U. Gudel, M. Haase. Adv. Mater., 16, 2102(2004).

    [16] H. Mai, Y. Zhang, L. Sun, C. Yan. J. Phys. Chem. C, 111, 13721(2007).

    [17] Y. Zhao, Q. Zhan, J. Liu, S. He. Biomed. Opt. Express, 6, 838(2015).

    [18] J. Liu, R. Wu, N. Li, X. Zhang, Q. Zhan. Biomed. Opt. Express, 6, 1857(2015).

    [19] A. Punjabi, X. Wu, A. Tokatli-Apollon, M. El-Rifai, H. Lee, Y. Zhang, C. Wang, Z. Liu, E. M. Chan, C. Duan, G. Han. ACS Nano, 8, 10621(2014).

    [20] J. Shen, G. Chen, T. Y. Ohulchanskyy, S. J. Kesseli, S. Buchholz, Z. Li, P. N. Prasad, G. Han. Small, 9, 3212(2013).

    [21] W. Wei, Y. Zhang, R. Chen, J. Goggi, N. Ren, L. Huang, K. K. Bhakoo, H. Sun, T. T. Yang Tan. Chem. Mater., 26, 5183(2014).

    [22] H. Qian, Y. Zhang. Langmuir, 24, 12123(2008).

    [23] W. Niu, S. Wu, S. Zhang. J. Mater. Chem., 21, 10894(2011).

    [24] W. Niu, S. Wu, S. Zhang. J. Mater. Chem., 20, 9113(2010).

    [25] Q. Dou, N. M. Idris, Y. Zhang. Biomaterials, 34, 1722(2013).

    [26] F. Wang, X. Liu. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 130, 5642(2008).

    [27] G. Tian, Z. Gu, L. Zhou, W. Yin, X. Liu, L. Yan, S. Jin, W. Ren, G. Xing, S. Li, Y. Zhao. Adv. Mater., 24, 1226(2012).

    [28] H. Wang, W. Lu, Z. Yi, L. Rao, S. Zeng, Z. Li. J. Alloys Comp., 618, 776(2015).

    [29] J. Wang, F. Wang, C. Wang, Z. Liu, X. Liu. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 50, 10369(2011).

    [30] D. Chen, L. Lei, R. Zhang, A. Yang, J. Xu, Y. Wang. Chem. Commun., 48, 10630(2012).

    [31] W. Gao, H. Zheng, Q. Han, E. He, F. Gao, R. Wang. J. Mater. Chem. C, 2, 5327(2014).

    [32] G. Chen, H. Liu, G. Somesfalean, H. Liang, Z. Zhang. Nanotechnology, 20, 385704(2009).

    [33] D. Chen, Y. Zhou, Z. Wan, Z. Ji, P. Huang. Dalton Trans., 44, 5288(2015).

    [34] S. Ye, G. Chen, W. Shao, J. Qu, P. N. Prasad. Nanoscale, 7, 3976(2015).

    Shuai Ye, Jun Song, Dong Wang, Yuliang Tian, Junle Qu, Hanben Niu. Reduced photon quenching in Ce-doped NaYF4:Yb/Ho upconversion nanoparticles with core/shell structure[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2016, 14(2): 021601
    Download Citation