• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 13, Issue 7, 1792 (2025)
Changyu Wang, Yuan Xu, Hong Xu, and Juan Liu*
Author Affiliations
  • Beijing Engineering Research Center for Mixed Reality and Advanced Display, MoE Key Laboratory of Photoelectronic Imaging Technology and System, School of Optics and Photonics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.554523 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Changyu Wang, Yuan Xu, Hong Xu, Juan Liu, "Lightweight holographic near-eye display system with self-charging capability using solar energy," Photonics Res. 13, 1792 (2025) Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    The near-eye display feature in emerging spatial computing systems produces a distinctive visual effect of mixing virtual and real worlds. However, its application for all-day wear is greatly limited by the bulky structure, energy expenditure, and continuous battery heating. Here, we propose a lightweight holographic near-eye display system that takes advantage of solar energy for self-charging. To guarantee the collection of solar energy and near-eye display without crosstalk, we implement holographic optical elements (HOEs) to diffract sunlight and signal light into a common waveguide. Then, small-area solar cells convert the collected solar energy and power the system. Compact power supply components replace heavy batteries, thus contributing to the lightweight design. The simple acquisition and management of solar energy provide the system with sustainable self-charging capability. We believe that the lightweight design and continuous energy input solution will significantly promote the popularity of near-eye display in our daily lives.

    1. INTRODUCTION

    As a fundamental advanced display technology of emerging spatial computing devices, near-eye display creates an immersive or perspective visual effect, demonstrating enormous potential for widespread applications. Nevertheless, the further integration of near-eye display systems into daily work and life of general consumers is influenced by the long-term wearing comfort and convenience. On the one hand, system weight is an important factor affecting wearing comfort [1,2]. Typically, high-capacity batteries accounting for over half of the total weight of current commercial near-eye display products, the weight of hundreds of grams, result in wearing pressure and structure design difficulties. On the other hand, the few-hour-long battery life requires frequent charging, making continuous use of the system troublesome or even impossible. Besides, the continuous heating of the battery during operation also negatively affects system performance and user experience, increasing the demand for effective thermal management.

    Previous researchers have attempted to address the weight burden and endurance capability of near-eye display systems. To reduce the weight and volume of the main system involves three effective solutions, utilizing lighter image sources such as micro light-emitting diodes [3] and laser beam scanning [4], designing lighter optical combiners including waveguides [5,6], holographic optical elements [7,8], or micro- and nano-optical elements [9,10], as well as separating light sources from the main system [11,12]. Besides, in existing commercial products, Apple’s Vision Pro separates the battery from the helmet system, while Meta’s Orion puts the computing components in a separate box from the glasses body. While the above methods reduce system weight to a certain extent, the user experience is degraded by the decrease in display performance and inconvenience of separating modules. Moreover, heavy batteries in the existing optimized system fail to meet the increasing demand for lightweight design. To extend the battery life, researchers proposed two solutions: improving energy utilization efficiency through reasonable optical design [7,13] and reducing energy consumption by implementing mobile edge computing [14,15]. Obviously, the battery life is only slightly extended due to the lack of a real-time energy input solution, so frequent battery charging is still inevitable.

    To satisfy the requirement of charging while consuming, researchers proposed some self-charging systems that eliminate the need for high-capacity batteries and additional charging devices. Currently, existing self-charging systems typically use biomechanical energy [1618], thermoelectric energy [19,20], piezoelectric energy [21], and solar energy [2225]. As a widely available clean energy, solar energy is a promising energy source for self-charging devices, but the acquisition and accumulation of solar energy need to add a complex structure, which is also a serious challenge for near-eye display systems. Overall, some methods were proposed to improve the comfort and convenience of near-eye display systems. However, there is a lack of fundamental solutions that comprehensively achieve lightweight design and continuous self-acquisition of clean energy from an optical perspective.

    In this study, we present a lightweight holographic near-eye display system with self-charging capability by simply capturing solar energy. The utilization of solar capture holographic optical element (HOE) and waveguides enables the collection of solar energy over a wide range in a compact structure without affecting near-eye display, providing an excellent continuous energy input solution. This integration not only adds a self-charging function to the system, but also avoids the impact of continuous battery heating on user experience and heat dissipation design difficulties. Replacing heavy batteries with small-area solar cells significantly reduces the weight of near-eye display systems and promotes the revolutionary evolution of structure from a helmet system to a wireless glasses system.

    2. SYSTEM AND PRINCIPLE

    Figure 1(a) illustrates the basic structure of the proposed system, which can be divided into two parts: solar power supply module and near-eye display module. The core component is an optical combiner consisting of a waveguide and three HOEs. Regarding one of the two symmetrical eyeglasses, the solar power supply module includes a solar capture HOE (HOE-1), a waveguide, and two solar cells. HOE-1 is anchored to the outer surface of the waveguide, and solar cells are located on both sides of the optical combiner above and below. The near-eye display module includes an image source, a coupling-in HOE (HOE-2), a coupling-out HOE (HOE-3), and a waveguide, where HOE-2 and HOE-3 are attached to the inner surface of the waveguide. It should be noted that the waveguides of the two modules are the same one and serve as a common carrier for collected solar energy and signal light. Compared with the traditional holographic near-eye display system, simply adding a thin film and small-area solar cells brings numerous benefits of self-charging capability.

    Illustration of the architecture and working principle of the proposed system. (a) Architecture of the proposed system. (b) Schematic diagram of solar energy collection. (c) Schematic diagram of solar power supply. (d) Schematic diagram of near-eye display.

    Figure 1.Illustration of the architecture and working principle of the proposed system. (a) Architecture of the proposed system. (b) Schematic diagram of solar energy collection. (c) Schematic diagram of solar power supply. (d) Schematic diagram of near-eye display.

    Figures 1(b)–1(d) respectively illustrate the principles of solar energy collection, power supply, and near-eye display. Sunlight and signal light are separately coupled into the waveguide by HOE-1 and HOE-2, propagating through different total internal reflection directions along z-axis and x-axis, and finally coupled out at HOE-3 and the edges of the waveguide, respectively. The collected solar energy is received by solar cells and converted into electrical energy, which powers the image source to generate signal light. Because of the angle selectivity and wavelength selectivity of volume HOE, only light that meets the Bragg condition will be diffracted with high efficiency, so the optical functions of three HOEs in the two modules will not interfere with each other.

    Specifically, the design parameters of the optical combiner are provided in Fig. 2. As shown in Fig. 2(a), in the near-eye display module, the signal light emitted from the image source is designed to vertically incident on HOE-2. The total reflection angle of the signal light within the waveguide is set at 60°, and HOE-3 couples the signal light vertically out of the waveguide into the human eye. It should be noted that this configuration represents only one example of a near-eye display module, while more complex forms (such as field-of-view expansion or exit-pupil expansion schemes) can also be integrated with the solar power supply module.

    Specific design parameters of the optical combiner. (a) Near-eye display module. (b) Solar energy collection module.

    Figure 2.Specific design parameters of the optical combiner. (a) Near-eye display module. (b) Solar energy collection module.

    The collection characteristics of HOE-1 will directly affect the power supply efficiency. The design of HOE-1 involves two steps: partition design and recording condition design. On the one hand, the secondary diffraction effect will cause some of the collected light to be coupled out in advance and unable to propagate to the edge of the waveguide, thereby reducing the effective collection area. The partition design aims to mitigate the impact of secondary diffraction on the effective collection area, requiring comprehensive consideration of waveguide thickness and propagation angles of collected light within the waveguide to determine appropriate partition quantities and single-partition lengths. For HOE-1 recorded with a single wavelength, different wavelengths propagate at varying angles within the waveguide due to Bragg matching conditions. Insufficient partition quantities or excessively large single-partition lengths may allow residual secondary diffraction effects for light with smaller propagation angles. Therefore, the partition design must holistically address the secondary diffraction of the wide collected spectrum rather than solely focusing on the recording wavelength, maximizing suppression and its influence on the collection area.

    On the other hand, as solar elevation angles vary across regions and throughout the day, the system requires wide-angle collection capability. However, the selectivity of HOE will lead to limitations in collection wavelengths and angles. In our system, HOE-1 is designed as a simple fabricating method using monochromatic plane waves, so the variable wavelength reconstruction condition is expected to overcome the above limitations as long as the recording wavelength and angle are designed reasonably. Generally, selecting a recording angle near the central angle within the target collection angle range and choosing a recording wavelength close to the central wavelength of the target spectrum help to optimally meet both angular and spectral requirements. The detailed analysis of the HOE-1 design is added to Appendix A.1. Ultimately, HOE-1 is designed with four partitions (each 12.5 mm), and each partition is designed with a different propagation angle within the waveguide. In addition, the recording wavelength is 532 nm and the recording angle in air is 30°, as illustrated in Fig. 2(b). Different from previous solar energy collectors, we fully utilize the flexibility and freedom of HOE and develop a sustainable real-time solar energy input solution suitable for near-eye display systems.

    3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

    A. Light Collection and Near-Eye Display

    In order to verify the rationality and feasibility of the proposed system, we have experimentally fabricated a prototype of the optical combiner as shown in Fig. 3(a). HOEs are fabricated by holographic exposure as designed and attached to a glass substrate, which serves as the waveguide. The fabrication wavelength of HOE-1 is 532 nm, and the collected solar energy is designed to propagate in total internal reflection mode along the z-axis inside the waveguide. HOE-2 and HOE-3 are fabricated by synthetic white light formed by 457 nm, 532 nm, and 639 nm lasers, and the signal light is designed to propagate in total internal reflection mode along the x-axis. The detailed fabrication method is provided in Appendix A.2. Subsequently, we measure the light collection and near-eye display effects of the optical combiner. Since the optical combiners of the two eyeglasses are symmetrical, only one of them is used for measurement.

    Results of the optical combiner. (a) Prototype of the optical combiner. HOE-1 is located on the front surface, and HOE-2 and HOE-3 are located on the back surface. (b) Collected light emitted from the edge of the waveguide. (c) Comparison of transmitted light spectrum without and with the optical combiner. The pink area and orange solid line respectively represent the transmitted light spectrum without and with the optical combiner. The brown dashed line represents the difference, which is collected by the optical combiner. (d) Full-color near-eye display effect. (e) Comparison of near-eye display without and with HOE-1.

    Figure 3.Results of the optical combiner. (a) Prototype of the optical combiner. HOE-1 is located on the front surface, and HOE-2 and HOE-3 are located on the back surface. (b) Collected light emitted from the edge of the waveguide. (c) Comparison of transmitted light spectrum without and with the optical combiner. The pink area and orange solid line respectively represent the transmitted light spectrum without and with the optical combiner. The brown dashed line represents the difference, which is collected by the optical combiner. (d) Full-color near-eye display effect. (e) Comparison of near-eye display without and with HOE-1.

    On the one hand, when using a flashlight with an LED light source to illuminate the optical combiner with white light at the recording incident angle, the collected light emitted from the edge of the waveguide is shown in Fig. 3(b). A portion of the collected light (represented by the green arrows) is reflected by the front surface for the last time inside the waveguide and tends to propagate to the left after coupling out from the edge of the waveguide, while another portion of the collected light (represented by the blue arrows) is reflected by the back surface and tends to propagate to the right. The separation of the two parts is relatively obvious under the divergent light of the flashlight, and this problem can be solved by designing the coupling-out surface as a curved surface in the future. Figure 3(c) illustrates a comparison of the transmitted light spectrum without and with the optical combiner. The difference indicates that the optical combiner collects part of the solar energy effectively. Define half of the maximum collection efficiency (the ratio of the collected light power to the incident light power) as the threshold for effective collection. At the recording incident angle, the center wavelength of the effective collection light is 532 nm and the spectral width is approximately 16 nm. Overall, the optical combiner can effectively accomplish the function of solar energy collection for recording wavelength at the recording incident angle. The collection of light that deviates from the recording conditions will be analyzed in Section 3.B.

    On the other hand, using a laser projector as the image source, the full-color near-eye display effect is shown in Fig. 3(d), and the target image consists of the letters “R”, “G”, and “B” and their corresponding colors. Figure 3(e) indicates the impact of HOE-1 on the near-eye display effect, when displaying the Chinese characters “Beijing” in the physical environment as augmented reality. The left and right figures show the display effects without and with HOE-1, respectively. It is obvious that HOE-1 causes a slight decrease in the transmittance of the physical environment, but it hardly affects the display effect of the target information. Overall, the impact of solar energy collection on near-eye display is negligible as expected.

    B. Collection Characteristic Measurement

    HOE has obvious wavelength and angle selectivity, so it can generally only be efficiently reconstructed under recording conditions, as demonstrated in Section 3.A. Nevertheless, by utilizing the grating merging effect, the effective collection wavelength and angle are not limited to the recording conditions any more (see Appendix A.1 for details). As a result, Figs. 4(a) and 4(b) show the definition of the vertical incident angle and the variation of the collected light at the upper and lower edges of the waveguide when white light is illuminated from different vertical incident angles. As shown in Fig. 4(b), the wavelength of the effective collection light is greatly expanded from the recording wavelength 532 nm to the entire visible spectrum. Figure 4(c) shows the detailed simulation and measurement results of the vertical incident angle and central collection wavelength for four different partitions of HOE-1. The experimental results are consistent with the simulation results of variable wavelength reconstruction based on k-vector analysis. In addition, broadening the collection spectrum will also lead to further expansion of the collection angle. Initially, the vertical angle width of effective collection is only about 3° for the recording wavelength of 532 nm. After collection wavelength expansion, the vertical angle width of effective collection increases up to 60°, as shown in Fig. 4(c). Besides, the optical combiner also has a larger horizontal collection angle of approximately 106°, thanks to the larger vertical selection angle of HOE (see Appendix A.1 for details). In summary, HOE-1 can collect solar energy within a large angle range of 106°×60°, and the collection spectral band covers the entire visible spectrum.

    Results of collection characteristic analysis. (a) Definition of vertical incident angle. The range of 0°–90°of vertical incident angle is defined as the change from incidence perpendicular to the waveguide to parallel to the waveguide. (b) The collected light results on the upper and lower edges of the waveguide at different vertical incident angles. (c) The relationship between the vertical incident angle and the center collection wavelength. HOE-1 is divided into four partitions, and the results of different partitions are represented by different colors. (d) Secondary diffraction phenomenon on thick substrates without partitioning HOE. (e) Secondary diffraction phenomenon on thin substrates with partitioning HOE. (f) Elimination of secondary diffraction phenomenon on thick substrates with partitioning HOE.

    Figure 4.Results of collection characteristic analysis. (a) Definition of vertical incident angle. The range of 0°–90°of vertical incident angle is defined as the change from incidence perpendicular to the waveguide to parallel to the waveguide. (b) The collected light results on the upper and lower edges of the waveguide at different vertical incident angles. (c) The relationship between the vertical incident angle and the center collection wavelength. HOE-1 is divided into four partitions, and the results of different partitions are represented by different colors. (d) Secondary diffraction phenomenon on thick substrates without partitioning HOE. (e) Secondary diffraction phenomenon on thin substrates with partitioning HOE. (f) Elimination of secondary diffraction phenomenon on thick substrates with partitioning HOE.

    In addition to the collection wavelength and angle mentioned above, the effective collection area is also an important indicator. Generally speaking, if the thickness of the waveguide or the total reflection angle is not large enough, the secondary diffraction effect will lead to a decrease in the effective area of HOE-1 due to the premature coupling-out of the collected light (see Appendix A.1 for further analysis). When 532 nm parallel light is incident on the optical combiner, the different results of secondary diffraction under different conditions are shown in Figs. 4(d)–4(f). Here, we demonstrate the impact of secondary diffraction on the effective collection area by displaying the transmitted light. The bright bars in the figures can be equivalently considered as invalid areas where light fails to be collected. As shown in Figs. 4(d) and 4(e), if HOE is not partitioned or the thickness of the waveguide is small (2 mm), the length of the effective collection area is about 17.5 and 15.5 mm, respectively. By comparison, as shown in Fig. 4(f), with a thick waveguide (5 mm) and partitioned HOE, the secondary diffraction effect is eliminated, which results in an increase in the length of the effective collection area to 25 mm. It should be noted that HOE-1 can collect solar energy to both upward and downward directions, so the total length is 50 mm, consequently covering the whole waveguide.

    Finally, we conduct tests on the collection and power supply efficiency of HOE-1. The results indicate that the collection efficiency of HOE-1 exceeds 60% at all wavelengths of 457 nm, 532 nm, and 639 nm under their corresponding Bragg angle incidence. It should be pointed out that the collection efficiency is the ratio of the collected light power to the incident light power; therefore it is influenced by both the diffraction efficiency of HOE and the transmission efficiency of total reflection. Additionally, as shown in Fig. 5(a), two solar cells with an area of 6  cm×4  cm and an output voltage of 3 V, as well as two rechargeable batteries with a rated voltage of 1.2 V are utilized to assess the power supply efficiency under sunlight. The collected light on the bottom solar cell is shown in Fig. 5(b), and the bottom solar cell can charge 17 mAh in half an hour. The charged amount of rechargeable batteries is measured by discharge equipment as shown in Figs. 5(c) and 5(e). Besides, the collected light on the top solar cell is shown in Fig. 5(d), and the top solar cell can charge 11 mAh in half an hour. Overall, the two waveguides of the system can charge a total of 56 mAh in half an hour. The main reason why the bottom solar cell charges more than the top solar cell is that it not only receives the collected light, but also receives some direct sunlight, which can also be achieved in practical near-eye display devices by using transparent eyeglass frames. The stored electrical energy of our system for half an hour can also be calculated as 56  mAh×1.2V=67.2  mWh. The proposed system can fulfill the function of self-charging using solar energy with a lightweight structure.

    Measurement of power supply efficiency under sunlight. (a) Device for measuring power supply efficiency. (b) The collected light on the bottom solar cell. (c) The charging capacity of the bottom solar cell in half an hour. (d) The collected light on the top solar cell. (e) The charging capacity of the top solar cell in half an hour.

    Figure 5.Measurement of power supply efficiency under sunlight. (a) Device for measuring power supply efficiency. (b) The collected light on the bottom solar cell. (c) The charging capacity of the bottom solar cell in half an hour. (d) The collected light on the top solar cell. (e) The charging capacity of the top solar cell in half an hour.

    4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

    Previous research has made many attempts to solve the weight burden and endurance capability of near-eye display systems, but mainly focused on retaining high-capacity batteries and reducing electricity consumption. In this paper, HOE is used to collect solar energy and power the system, and the problems of limited collection angle and secondary diffraction effect are solved. The results indicate that the system has the ability to charge 67.2 mWh in half an hour. Here, we define an indicator called “charging to consumption ratio”, which refers to the ratio of energy stored during charging to energy consumed during operation. Typically, the existing commercial intelligent glasses product Ray-Ban Meta has a rated battery capacity of 154 mAh 0.595 Wh, which can power the device for 4 h. The combination of our charging system and this product will result in a charging to consumption ratio of 0.9. Besides, some commercial AR glasses have a 0.85–1.7 Wh battery capacity that can power the devices for about 2.5–4 h. In this case, the charging to consumption ratio will decrease to 0.20–0.63. Additionally, accounting for charging efficiency, energy loss, variable weather conditions, and nocturnal usage constraints, the battery remains challenging to be fully replaced; nevertheless, the solar-based self-charging solution will inevitably prolong the operating time of near-eye display systems.

    Furthermore, there will be many interesting studies in the future, given that the power supply efficiency of current prototypes needs further improvement. On the one hand, the optical multiplexing characteristics [26,27] and more flexible light modulation schemes based on spherical waves or freeform waves are anticipated to increase the collected solar energy. On the other hand, the collection of wasted signal light that is not received by users will also significantly improve power supply efficiency. Finally, the employment of solar cells with high conversion efficiency and power-per-weight [28,29], such as perovskite cells [30,31], will further enhance the output power. In the future, we believe that more efficient energy collection elements, solar cells with higher conversion efficiency, and the integration of lightweight solar cells and eyeglass frames such as temples will inevitably increase the “charging-to-consumption ratio” to one, or even exceeding it.

    In summary, this paper proposes a lightweight self-charging holographic near-eye display system that collects sustainable solar energy over a large angle range of 106°×60°. The functional multiplexing waveguide aids in achieving both the collection of sunlight and near-eye display in a compact structure. The self-charging capability effectively avoids many drawbacks of huge-capacity batteries, such as heavy weight, continuous heating, and frequent charging. These improvements also make it possible to miniaturize near-eye display devices. It is worth mentioning that the proposed self-charging method is not limited to the above-mentioned system, but is universally applicable. We believe that our contribution will help sustainable energy become the primary energy source for lightweight near-eye display systems, enabling all-day wear and facilitating its widespread application.

    APPENDIX A: METHODS

    1. Details of HOE Design

    The optical characteristics of solar capture HOE are crucial for solar energy collection. Two important indicators are effective collection area and collection angle.

    On the one hand, the size of the effective collection area is limited due to the phenomenon of secondary diffraction. As shown in Figs. 6(a)–6(c), when HOE is designed as an identical structure without partitioning, some of the collected light will be directly coupled out in advance during propagation, rather than being collected to the edge of the waveguide as designed. In other words, the solar capture HOE will have some invalid area. The fundamental reason is that the collected light shown by the red line in Fig. 6(c) fully satisfies the Bragg condition at point C1, and therefore it will be efficiently diffracted by HOE for the second time. However, as shown in Figs. 6(d) and 6(e), if HOE-1 is partitioned by designing different total internal reflection angles, the light collected by the invalid area will no longer satisfy the Bragg condition at point C2, thereby eliminating the secondary diffraction effect. In this case, the effective collection area of HOE-1 is approximately doubled. In addition, HOE-1 can collect solar energy in both upward and downward directions and can be designed as four partitions, so that the effective collection area is expanded by four times. Consequently, the effective collection area can cover the entire waveguide surface.

    Schematic diagram of the reason and elimination of secondary diffraction effect. (a) HOE without partition design. (b) The effective area of HOE without partitioning. The light incident on the effective area shown by the green square can be successfully collected to the edge of the waveguide. (c) The invalid area of HOE without partitioning. The light incident on the invalid area shown by the gray square cannot be collected to the edge of the waveguide, but is diffracted for the second time into the transmitted light shown by the red line. (d) HOE with partition design. (e) Elimination of secondary diffraction. The light shown by the blue line is no longer diffracted a second time at point C2 due to the mismatch of Bragg condition.

    Figure 6.Schematic diagram of the reason and elimination of secondary diffraction effect. (a) HOE without partition design. (b) The effective area of HOE without partitioning. The light incident on the effective area shown by the green square can be successfully collected to the edge of the waveguide. (c) The invalid area of HOE without partitioning. The light incident on the invalid area shown by the gray square cannot be collected to the edge of the waveguide, but is diffracted for the second time into the transmitted light shown by the red line. (d) HOE with partition design. (e) Elimination of secondary diffraction. The light shown by the blue line is no longer diffracted a second time at point C2 due to the mismatch of Bragg condition.

    Analysis of collection angle. (a) Wavelength mismatch at the recording angle. (b) Variable wavelength reconstruction at different angles. (c) Horizontal and vertical selection angles of HOE.

    Figure 7.Analysis of collection angle. (a) Wavelength mismatch at the recording angle. (b) Variable wavelength reconstruction at different angles. (c) Horizontal and vertical selection angles of HOE.

    Holographic exposure system based on right-angle prism for fabricating HOE-1.

    Figure 8.Holographic exposure system based on right-angle prism for fabricating HOE-1.

    Holographic exposure system based on equilateral prism for fabricating HOE-2 and HOE-3.

    Figure 9.Holographic exposure system based on equilateral prism for fabricating HOE-2 and HOE-3.

    3. Implementation of Prototype

    The experimental prototype can be divided into three parts: near-eye display module, solar energy collection module, and power supply module. Firstly, in the near-eye display module, a color laser projection with an integrated collimation system is implemented as the image source and the signal light emitted from it is perpendicular to the waveguide surface. Besides, the widths of the fabricated HOE-2 and HOE-3 are both 7 mm. The thickness of the glass waveguide is 5 mm. Secondly, in the power supply module, the area of the fabricated HOE-1 is equal to that of the waveguide. Two silicon-based solar cells with a maximum output voltage of 3 V are located on the upper and lower sides of the waveguide. Finally, the output electrical energy of the solar energy collection module is stored in two rechargeable batteries as input energy for the near-eye display module.

    References

    [1] R. Galati, M. Simone, G. Barile. Experimental setup employed in the operating room based on virtual and mixed reality: analysis of pros and cons in open abdomen surgery. J. Healthc. Eng., 2020, 8851964(2020).

    [2] D. Odell, N. Dorbala. The effects of head mounted weight on comfort for helmets and headsets, with a definition of “comfortable wear time”. Work, 77, 651-658(2024).

    [3] Y. F. Wu, J. S. Ma, P. Su. Full-color realization of micro-LED displays. Nanomaterials, 10, 2482(2020).

    [4] S. Morgott, K. Leahy, F. Rommen. Laser-based projection displays for all-day-use consumer AR glasses. Proc. SPIE, 12449, 124490J(2023).

    [5] M. M. Xu, H. Hua. Methods of optimizing and evaluating geometrical lightguides with microstructure mirrors for augmented reality displays. Opt. Express, 27, 5523-5543(2019).

    [6] B. C. Kress, I. Chatterjee. Waveguide combiners for mixed reality headsets: a nanophotonics design perspective. Nanophotonics, 10, 41-74(2021).

    [7] X. L. Shi, J. Liu, J. S. Xiao. Design of a compact waveguide eyeglass with high efficiency by joining freeform surfaces and volume holographic gratings. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 38, A19-A26(2021).

    [8] Q. K. Gao, J. Liu, X. H. Duan. Compact see-through 3D head-mounted display based on wavefront modulation with holographic grating filter. Opt. Express, 25, 8412-8424(2017).

    [9] H. Boo, Y. S. Lee, H. B. Yang. Metasurface wavefront control for high-performance user-natural augmented reality waveguide glasses. Sci. Rep., 12, 5832(2022).

    [10] M. Gopakumar, G. Y. Lee, S. Choi. Full-colour 3D holographic augmented-reality displays with metasurface waveguides. Nature, 629, 791-797(2024).

    [11] Y. Itoh, T. Kaminokado, K. Aksit. Beaming displays. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 27, 2659-2668(2021).

    [12] H. Aoki, T. Tochimoto, Y. Hiroi. Towards co-operative beaming displays: dual steering projectors for extended projection volume and head orientation range. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 30, 2309-2318(2024).

    [13] S. Samoilova, A. Gupta, R. Blum. NewSight Reality Inc. (NSR) novel transparent optical module for augmented reality eyewear. Proc. SPIE, 11062, 110620D(2019).

    [14] A. Al-Shuwaili, O. Simeone. Energy-efficient resource allocation for mobile edge computing-based augmented reality applications. IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., 6, 398-401(2017).

    [15] J. Ahn, J. Lee, S. Yoon. A novel resolution and power control scheme for energy-efficient mobile augmented reality applications in mobile edge computing. IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., 9, 750-754(2020).

    [16] S. M. Niu, X. F. Wang, F. Yi. A universal self-charging system driven by random biomechanical energy for sustainable operation of mobile electronics. Nat. Commun., 6, 8975(2015).

    [17] Z. X. Zhang, F. Wen, Z. D. Sun. Artificial intelligence-enabled sensing technologies in the 5G/internet of things era: from virtual reality/augmented reality to the digital twin. Adv. Intell. Syst., 4, 2100228(2022).

    [18] Z. H. Peng, J. H. Shi, X. Xiao. Self-charging electrostatic face masks leveraging triboelectrification for prolonged air filtration. Nat. Commun., 13, 7835(2023).

    [19] L. Zhang, X. L. Shi, Y. L. Yang. Flexible thermoelectric materials and devices: from materials to applications. Mater. Today, 46, 62-108(2021).

    [20] J. Kim, S. Khan, P. Wu. Self-charging wearables for continuous health monitoring. Nano Energy, 79, 105419(2021).

    [21] S. R. Anton, A. Erturk, D. J. Inman. Multifunctional self-charging structures using piezoceramics and thin-film batteries. Smart Mater. Struct., 19, 115021(2010).

    [22] J. T. Xu, Y. H. Chen, L. M. Dai. Efficiently photo-charging lithium-ion battery by perovskite solar cell. Nat. Commun., 6, 8103(2015).

    [23] X. F. Wang, K. Jiang, G. Z. Shen. Flexible fiber energy storage and integrated devices: recent progress and perspectives. Mater. Today, 18, 265-272(2015).

    [24] Y. Yang, M. T. Hoang, A. Bhardwaj. Perovskite solar cells based self-charging power packs: fundamentals, applications and challenges. Nano Energy, 94, 106910(2022).

    [25] D. Devadiga, M. Selvakumar, P. Shetty. The integration of flexible dye-sensitized solar cells and storage devices towards wearable self-charging power systems: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 159, 112252(2022).

    [26] R. Shi, J. Liu, H. Z. Zhao. Chromatic dispersion correction in planar waveguide using one-layer volume holograms based on three-step exposure. Appl. Opt., 51, 4703-4708(2012).

    [27] Y. Xu, Z. Lv, C. Y. Wang. Design and fabrication of multifunctional holographic optical elements in laser Doppler velocimeter. Opt. Express, 31, 21753-21771(2023).

    [28] X. L. Zhang, V. A. Öberg, J. Du. Extremely lightweight and ultra-flexible infrared light-converting quantum dot solar cells with high power-per-weight output using a solution-processed bending durable silver nanowire-based electrode. Energy Environ. Sci., 11, 354-364(2018).

    [29] A. Panagiotopoulos, T. Maksudov, G. Kakavelakis. A critical perspective for emerging ultra-thin solar cells with ultra-high power-per-weight outputs. Appl. Phys. Rev., 10, 041303(2023).

    [30] Y. Z. Hu, T. T. Niu, Y. H. Liu. Flexible perovskite solar cells with high power-per-weight: progress, application, and perspectives. ACS Energy Lett., 6, 2917-2943(2021).

    [31] Y. M. Xu, Z. H. Lin, W. Wei. Recent progress of electrode materials for flexible perovskite solar cells. Nano-Micro Lett., 14, 117(2022).

    Changyu Wang, Yuan Xu, Hong Xu, Juan Liu, "Lightweight holographic near-eye display system with self-charging capability using solar energy," Photonics Res. 13, 1792 (2025)
    Download Citation