- Chinese Optics Letters
- Vol. 22, Issue 3, 031901 (2024)
Abstract
1. Introduction
The Talbot effect, initially discovered by H. F. Talbot in 1836[1], refers to the self-replication phenomenon of periodic structures[2] under quasi-monochromatic coherent light illumination, which directly arises from near-field Fresnel diffraction[3]. The Talbot distance is defined as the position at which waves periodically reproduce themselves along the propagation direction[4]. In addition to optics, this effect has also been widely studied and applied in condensed matter[5,6], quantum revivals[7,8], X-ray[9,10], plasmonic[11,12], electron[13,14], prime-number decomposition[15], and so on. Currently, research on the optical Talbot effect has expanded from the spatial domain[16–18] to the temporal domain[19–21], from linear to nonlinear[22], and from continuous media to discrete systems[16–18,23]. Unlike in continuous media, the occurrence of the Talbot effect in discrete media requires the pattern period to meet specific conditions[4,18], whether in one-dimension[24] or two-dimensions[25].
The non-Hermitian Hamiltonians have completely real spectra if they obey parity-time (PT) symmetry, which was proved by Bender and their colleagues[26,27]. The anti-PT symmetry demands that the refractive index should satisfy [28,29]. This means that the real part , the phase distribution, should be an odd function, while the imaginary part , the gain/loss, should be an even function. PT-symmetry in optics was initially observed in the context of two coupled waveguides[30,31]. However, experimental achievement on an anti-PT symmetric large-scale lattice is highly limited. To overcome limitations, recently, there has been a generalization of the lattice concept from real space to synthetic dimensions, including temporal and spectral lattices[32,33]. By representing a temporal grid lattice, the evolution of pulses in two coupled fiber rings can be analogous to the dynamics of light beams in a spatial grid lattice[19]. Through temporal control of gain and loss within the lattice structure[34,35], researchers have, to the best of their knowledge, successfully achieved experimental realization of PT-symmetry in large-scale lattices for the first time[36].
In this study, we employ an anti-PT symmetric synthetic photonic lattice composed of two coupled fiber loops. Electro-optic and acousto-optic modulators are utilized to adjust the phase distribution as well as gain and loss coefficients of the system. First, the band structure is calculated, followed by a theoretical analysis of the conditions for generating the Talbot effect and the calculation method of the Talbot distance. Additionally, simulations are conducted under two scenarios, Hermitian phase modulation and non-Hermitian modulation, to investigate the Talbot self-imaging phenomenon. The goal is to explore the influence of these different modulation methods on the Talbot effect and the characteristics of self-imaging.
Sign up for Chinese Optics Letters TOC. Get the latest issue of Chinese Optics Letters delivered right to you!Sign up now
2. Model and Theory
The anti-PT symmetric synthetic photonic lattice is formed by two coupled fiber loops, which are shown in Fig. 1(a). A 50:50 directional coupler connects two fiber rings with a length difference [19,29]. Once the coupler receives the initial light pulse injected into the long loop, it generates two new pulses that flow into each loop. After completing one round trip, the pulses in the short loop return to the coupler first, and subsequently propagate in the long loop. As a result, the two pulse trains interfere with each other through the coupler[20]. Like the dynamics of beams in spatial grids, the pulse train undergoes incremental evolution as the number of round trips increases. The equivalent lattice in the time domain is shown in Fig. 1(b), where is the number of pulses entering the coupler, and is the position of the pulse in the lattice.
Figure 1.Schematic of anti-PT symmetric synthetic photonic lattice. (a) Two coupling fiber loops with a length difference and (b) corresponding temporal mesh lattice with anti-PT symmetry. (c) Distribution of the phase, gain, and loss.
As mentioned in the introduction section, to guarantee the odd symmetry of the real part, the phase modulator needs to be adjusted so that satisfies
Similarly, to ensure that the imaginary part is an even function, the acousto-optic modulator needs to be adjusted, and the gain () and loss () are set as
To better study the optical pulse transmission characteristics in the synthesized photonic lattice, we use to solve the dispersion relation of the system. The Bloch mode is , where is the periodic Bloch function, and represent the transverse Bloch momentum and longitudinal propagation constant, respectively[36,37]. By inserting Eqs. (1) and (2) and the Bloch mode into Eq. (3), we can obtain the dispersion relation
The band structure can be manipulated by adjusting the wave vector , the phase , and the gain (loss ). For , Eq. (4) becomes . The band structures with different values of have been investigated[29].
Next, as , the dispersion relationship is simplified as . Figure 2 illustrates the band structures with various gain . In Fig. 2(a), the band structures become entirely real and exhibit anomalies. In Figs. 2(b)–2(e), the bands exhibit both real and imaginary parts. However, in Fig. 2(f), the bands become entirely imaginary.
Figure 2.Band structures for G = 0, G = 0.1, G = 0.2, G = 0.3, G = 0.327, and G = 0.33, respectively. φ = π/2. The blue line represents the real part of the band, and the red line represents the imaginary part of the band.
Considering the essential prerequisites for the occurrence of the Talbot effect in the synthetic photonic lattice, we assume that the input field has the period in the time domain grid. Due to transverse discreteness, is an integer[19]. Therefore, the period of the incident pulse train in the coupling loop is . To satisfy the periodic boundary condition, the Bloch momentum is , where and . The propagation constant corresponding to the Bloch momentum is expressed as , where is the band index and is equal to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. The propagation constant at the fourth band is .
The Bloch superposition is used to describe the evolution of the field,
Recovery can occur only when satisfies , where is the recovery distance, and is a nonzero integer. Since the time-domain grid is discrete in the propagation direction and is an integer, should be a rational multiple of [19]. Therefore, the Talbot distance is , where LCM is the least common multiple.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Talbot effect of Hermitian phase modulation
First, we study the influence of the phase of the Hermitian operator on the Talbot effect. For , the gain factor takes a value of . Considering the periodic boundary conditions with , the propagation constant is , and the Talbot effect occurs when the mode of can be replicated during propagation. Assuming efficient recovery of the mode, we can express as , where and are relatively prime integers.
For odd and , the modal recovery distance for is . For , , and , according to the symmetry of the bands, the propagation constants are , , and . The recovery distances are , , , and . Thus, the Talbot distance is . In Fig. 3(a1), the evolution of the pulse intensity is the Talbot effect plot, where the pulse train achieves complete recovery every 16 steps. At , the intensity distribution is the same as the initial distribution at , which only accumulates a phase delay. For , according to the symmetry of the bands, the corresponding propagation constants of the bands are , , , and . The recovery distances are , , , and . Thus, the Talbot distance is . The corresponding Talbot diagram is presented in Fig. 3(b1). For and , the Bloch momentums are and , and the propagation constants of the fourth band are
Figure 3.(a1), (b1) The pulse intensity evolution in the long loop is shown for φ = 0 and φ = 0.5π, respectively. The input period is N = 4. (c1), (d1) The pulse intensity evolution in the long loop is shown for N = 8 and N = 12 with φ = 0. The green dotted line is the location of the Talbot images.
To support recovery, and are both in the form of . The Talbot effect occurs only when equals zero, and the Talbot distance is , as shown in Fig. 3(c1). Due to the periodic incidence conditions and transverse discreteness, the set of should be restricted to , where is the longest transmission distance. For , the Talbot effect does not occur. We use the case of as an example for illustration. For , the corresponding Bloch momentum is , and the propagation constant is and is no longer rational multiples of . Consequently, the condition required for the Talbot effect, as illustrated in Fig. 3(d1), is not satisfied, the propagation image along the propagation direction does not exhibit periodic recovery, and the energy shows irregular oscillation.
On the other hand, the Talbot distance can be manipulated by applying linear phase modulation to the incident pulse train. We denote the interval between adjacent pulse phase shifts as . In Fig. 4, the input field of the temporal grid also has an initial momentum , which causes the Bloch momentum to become . For , the fourth band with the corresponding transmission constant is . The Talbot effect exists only when is a rational multiple of , and we express as , where and are positive integers of relative prime numbers. Since and , the range of values for is . should be at least 3, and the corresponding Talbot distance is . The set of Talbot distances is denoted by . For , when takes the values of and , it corresponds to and , respectively. For , when takes the values of and , it corresponds to and , respectively. The corresponding Talbot images are depicted in Figs. 4(a1)–4(d1).
Figure 4.Input pulse period N = 4. (a1), (b1) Talbot carpets for φ0 = 0.36π and φ0 = 0.46π. G = 0. (c1), (d1) Talbot carpets for φ0 = 0.15π and φ0 = 0.5π. G = 0.21.
3.2. Non-Hermitian modulated Talbot effect
The Talbot effect can also be observed by modifying the non-Hermitian coefficients of gain and loss. For and , the fourth band propagation constant is . When the gain coefficients are and , respectively, the propagation constants of the fourth band are and . The corresponding Talbot distance is and , and the Talbot images are shown in Figs. 5(a1) and 5(b1).
Figure 5.(a1), (b1) Talbot carpets for G = 0.29 and G = 0.35. φ = 0. (c1), (d1) Talbot carpets for G = 0.25 and G = 0.31. φ = π/2. (e1), (f1) Talbot carpets for G = 0.29 and G = 0.35. φ = π.
Then, we investigated the case where equals 4 and equals . We found that when the gain-loss coefficient and the input pulse period are identical, the Talbot effect and the amplitude of energy remain consistent for the two initial phases of and .
For and , according to Fig. 2, the first and second bands are symmetrical with respect to , the third band is symmetrical with the fourth band , and the first (second) band is symmetrical with the fourth (third) band about . The fourth band propagation coefficient is . The Talbot effect occurs when is a rational multiple of , expressed as . In this case, the Talbot distance can be calculated as . Considering that the gain-loss factor falls within the range of , the propagation constant is in the range of to , with being at least 5. Thus, the Talbot distance falls within the range . Accompanying the energy oscillations during Talbot imaging, for , the propagation constant of the fourth band is . Consequently, the corresponding Talbot distance is , which is illustrated in Fig. 5(c1). For , the propagation constant of the fourth band is , corresponding to the Talbot distance , as shown in Fig. 5(d1). From Figs. 5(c1) and 5(d1), the amplitude of energy oscillation increases as the gain-loss factor augments. For , the band structure becomes entirely imaginary; as illustrated in Fig. 2(f), the input field distribution cannot be recovered due to varying degrees of amplification or attenuation experienced by these modes. Therefore, when the included modes are excited in the purely imaginary region of the band structure, the Talbot effect does not occur. We attempted to utilize the enumeration method to detect the presence of the Talbot effect for . However, the Talbot effect does not occur.
The influence of parameters and on the energy bands is depicted in Fig. 6. When above the curve, all eigenvalues of the system are completely imaginary. When on the curve, symmetry breaking occurs. Below the line, the eigenvalues of the system are complex, representing a complex spectrum with both real and imaginary components. It is evident that the curve exhibits symmetry with respect to the axis.
Figure 6.The curve representing the anti-PT symmetry breaking threshold in a two-dimensional parameter space of φ and γ.
4. Conclusion
In summary, we constructed an anti-PT symmetric synthetic photonic lattice using two coupled fiber loops. We presented the corresponding equivalent lattice diagram and derived the pulse amplitude expression for light pulses in the double loops. Then, we obtained the dispersion relation of the system using discrete plane wave solutions and plotted the band structure by varying phase values and gain-loss coefficients. Furthermore, we analyzed and studied the Talbot effect in the anti-PT symmetric synthetic photonic lattice under both Hermitian and non-Hermitian phase modulation. The research revealed that when the input period is , the Talbot distance can be flexibly controlled by changing the gain and loss factors or linearly modulating the input pulse sequence. Additionally, at , when the gain-loss factor is greater than or equal to 0.33, the Talbot effect disappears. If the pulse input period, gain, and loss coefficients are the same, the band structures corresponding to the pulse phases and exhibit the same patterns, resulting in the same Talbot effect and associated energy oscillations. This work may find promising applications in pulse repetition-rate multiplication, temporal cloaking, and tunable intensity amplifiers.
Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address