• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 44, Issue 8, 0812004 (2024)
Tianyu Yuan1, Xiangjun Dai2, and Fujun Yang1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Engineering Mechanics, School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu , China
  • 2School of Transportation and Vehicle Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255090, Shandong , China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS231629 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Tianyu Yuan, Xiangjun Dai, Fujun Yang. Influence Evaluation of Systematic Errors and Prismatic Postures on Field of View in Monocular Stereo Vision[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2024, 44(8): 0812004 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of prism-splitting monocular stereo vision system
    Fig. 1. Schematic of prism-splitting monocular stereo vision system
    Schematic of ray tracing for stereo vision system
    Fig. 2. Schematic of ray tracing for stereo vision system
    Three typical biprism postures. (a) Rotation around coincidence point; (b) offset along x-direction; (c) offset along z-direction
    Fig. 3. Three typical biprism postures. (a) Rotation around coincidence point; (b) offset along x-direction; (c) offset along z-direction
    Monocular stereo vision system based on dual-biprism and its captured images. (a) Experimental setup; (b) real image obtained by camera snapshot; (c) image obtained by left virtual camera; (d) image obtained by right virtual camera
    Fig. 4. Monocular stereo vision system based on dual-biprism and its captured images. (a) Experimental setup; (b) real image obtained by camera snapshot; (c) image obtained by left virtual camera; (d) image obtained by right virtual camera
    Depth information of measured object and results of profile reconstruction. (a) Two sub-images captured by camera snapshot and its RoI; (b) schematic diagram of stereo matching; (c) result of DIC; (d) disparity map; (e) depth map; (f) 3D depth map
    Fig. 5. Depth information of measured object and results of profile reconstruction. (a) Two sub-images captured by camera snapshot and its RoI; (b) schematic diagram of stereo matching; (c) result of DIC; (d) disparity map; (e) depth map; (f) 3D depth map
    Snapshot image taken by a single camera
    Fig. 6. Snapshot image taken by a single camera
    Results of disparity variation with object distance and angle. (a) Changing object distance; (b) changing angle between prisms
    Fig. 7. Results of disparity variation with object distance and angle. (a) Changing object distance; (b) changing angle between prisms
    Results of FoV varying with biprism posture. (a) Rotation around coincidence point; (b) offset along x-direction; (c) offset along z-direction
    Fig. 8. Results of FoV varying with biprism posture. (a) Rotation around coincidence point; (b) offset along x-direction; (c) offset along z-direction
    Comparison results of depth calculation method and DIC method at three cross-sections. (a) Cross-section A-A; (b) cross-section B-B; (c) cross-section C-C
    Fig. 9. Comparison results of depth calculation method and DIC method at three cross-sections. (a) Cross-section A-A; (b) cross-section B-B; (c) cross-section C-C
    Error curves of cross-section data. (a) Cross-section A-A; (b) cross-section B-B; (c) cross-section C-C
    Fig. 10. Error curves of cross-section data. (a) Cross-section A-A; (b) cross-section B-B; (c) cross-section C-C
    Comparison of profiles at cross-section B-B when object distance and angle between prisms are changed. (a) Initial position; (b) object distance decreases by 7 cm; (c) object distance decreases by 10 cm; (d) angle between prisms increases by 0.6°; (e) angle between prisms increases by 1.8°; (f) angle between prisms increases by 3°
    Fig. 11. Comparison of profiles at cross-section B-B when object distance and angle between prisms are changed. (a) Initial position; (b) object distance decreases by 7 cm; (c) object distance decreases by 10 cm; (d) angle between prisms increases by 0.6°; (e) angle between prisms increases by 1.8°; (f) angle between prisms increases by 3°
    Comparison between offset coordinates obtained by corner detection and results computed by modified model. (a) Prism rotation; (b) offset of prism along x-direction; (c) offset of prism along z-direction
    Fig. 12. Comparison between offset coordinates obtained by corner detection and results computed by modified model. (a) Prism rotation; (b) offset of prism along x-direction; (c) offset of prism along z-direction
    Tianyu Yuan, Xiangjun Dai, Fujun Yang. Influence Evaluation of Systematic Errors and Prismatic Postures on Field of View in Monocular Stereo Vision[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2024, 44(8): 0812004
    Download Citation