• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 22, Issue 4, 041902 (2024)
Yan Sheng1、2、*, Shan Liu3、**, Xiaokang Hu1、2, Xin Chen4, Tianxiang Xu1、2, Ruwei Zhao1、2, and Wieslaw Krolikowski3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Laboratory of Infrared Materials and Devices, Research Institute of Advanced Technologies, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
  • 2Engineering Research Center for Advanced Infrared Photoelectric Materials and Devices of Zhejiang Province, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
  • 3Department of Quantum Science and Technology, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
  • 4School of Physics and Optoelectronics Engineering, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL202422.041902 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yan Sheng, Shan Liu, Xiaokang Hu, Xin Chen, Tianxiang Xu, Ruwei Zhao, Wieslaw Krolikowski. Second-harmonic generation in periodic fork-shaped χ(2) gratings at oblique incidence[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2024, 22(4): 041902 Copy Citation Text show less
    (a) Illustrating the femtosecond laser writing of periodic fork-shaped χ(2) gratings in a z-cut CBN crystal; (b) 3D image of the fabricated periodic fork domain structures, obtained using Čerenkov SH microscopy[28]; (c) Čerenkov microscopic image of a single layer of the structure.
    Fig. 1. (a) Illustrating the femtosecond laser writing of periodic fork-shaped χ(2) gratings in a z-cut CBN crystal; (b) 3D image of the fabricated periodic fork domain structures, obtained using Čerenkov SH microscopy[28]; (c) Čerenkov microscopic image of a single layer of the structure.
    (a) Wavelength tuning response of the SHG in periodic fork-shaped grating at normal incidence; (b) recorded SH images at resonant wavelengths of 1270, 1160, and 1070 nm in the far field. They correspond to QPM interactions involving different orders of longitudinal reciprocal lattice vectors. (c) The phase-matching diagrams at these resonance wavelengths; the transverse phase-matching conditions are the same for these three wavelengths, but the longitudinal conditions are different. From left to right (1070 to 1270 nm), the corresponding reciprocal lattice vectors in the longitudinal direction are G0,0,4, G0,0,3, G0,0,2, i.e., m = 4, 3, 2, respectively.
    Fig. 2. (a) Wavelength tuning response of the SHG in periodic fork-shaped grating at normal incidence; (b) recorded SH images at resonant wavelengths of 1270, 1160, and 1070 nm in the far field. They correspond to QPM interactions involving different orders of longitudinal reciprocal lattice vectors. (c) The phase-matching diagrams at these resonance wavelengths; the transverse phase-matching conditions are the same for these three wavelengths, but the longitudinal conditions are different. From left to right (1070 to 1270 nm), the corresponding reciprocal lattice vectors in the longitudinal direction are G0,0,4, G0,0,3, G0,0,2, i.e., m = 4, 3, 2, respectively.
    (a) and (b) Quasi-phase-matching diagrams of SHGs using reciprocal lattice vectors G0,1,2 and G0,-1,2 at oblique incidence of the fundamental wave, respectively. These two conditions are usually fulfilled at different wavelengths.
    Fig. 3. (a) and (b) Quasi-phase-matching diagrams of SHGs using reciprocal lattice vectors G0,1,2 and G0,-1,2 at oblique incidence of the fundamental wave, respectively. These two conditions are usually fulfilled at different wavelengths.
    (a) and (b) Experimental wavelength tuning responses of the SHs using G0,-1,2 and G0,1,2, respectively; (c) and (d) recorded SH images at fundamental wavelengths of 1260 and 1275 nm, respectively.
    Fig. 4. (a) and (b) Experimental wavelength tuning responses of the SHs using G0,-1,2 and G0,1,2, respectively; (c) and (d) recorded SH images at fundamental wavelengths of 1260 and 1275 nm, respectively.
    (a) Ferroelectric domain structure for conversion of a fundamental Gaussian beam into an SH Bessel beam; (b) Fourier transform spectrum of this structure; (c) phase-matching conditions are different along the azimuthal directions at normal incidence of the fundamental Gaussian beam. Here an extreme case is given where phase-matching conditions are obtained only on the left edge of the ring-shaped reciprocal vectors. (d) Calculated SHs at normal incidence; (e) the phase-matching conditions become the same for all the azimuthal angles by employing an obliquely incident fundamental beam. (f) Calculated SH Bessel beams at the oblique incidence.
    Fig. 5. (a) Ferroelectric domain structure for conversion of a fundamental Gaussian beam into an SH Bessel beam; (b) Fourier transform spectrum of this structure; (c) phase-matching conditions are different along the azimuthal directions at normal incidence of the fundamental Gaussian beam. Here an extreme case is given where phase-matching conditions are obtained only on the left edge of the ring-shaped reciprocal vectors. (d) Calculated SHs at normal incidence; (e) the phase-matching conditions become the same for all the azimuthal angles by employing an obliquely incident fundamental beam. (f) Calculated SH Bessel beams at the oblique incidence.
    Yan Sheng, Shan Liu, Xiaokang Hu, Xin Chen, Tianxiang Xu, Ruwei Zhao, Wieslaw Krolikowski. Second-harmonic generation in periodic fork-shaped χ(2) gratings at oblique incidence[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2024, 22(4): 041902
    Download Citation