• Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves
  • Vol. 43, Issue 3, 300 (2024)
Zheng-Qiong XIAO1, Hao-Guang DAI1, Xin-Yang LIU2, Ping-Ping CHEN2, and Fang-Xing ZHA1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physics,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444,China
  • 2National Laboratory for Microstructures,Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shanghai 200083,China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2024.03.002 Cite this Article
    Zheng-Qiong XIAO, Hao-Guang DAI, Xin-Yang LIU, Ping-Ping CHEN, Fang-Xing ZHA. The scanning tunneling spectra of Hg0.72Cd0.28Te and the model interpretation[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2024, 43(3): 300 Copy Citation Text show less
    :(a) A STM image of Hg0.72Cd0.28Te; (b) Typical STS data by the I-V measurement.
    Fig. 1. :(a) A STM image of Hg0.72Cd0.28Te; (b) Typical STS data by the I-V measurement.
    (a) and (b) are energy band diagrams for the positive and negative sample biases,respectively. EF,S and EF,T represent the Fermi levels of sample and tip,respectively; (c) The blue lines are the calculated variation of surface potential of HgCdTe with the sample bias by TIBB model. The dashed line designates the variation of Fermi level of tip,whose intercrosses with the blue lines define the onsets of tunneling current and their distance as designated by the horizontal arrow predicts the apparent band gap measured.
    Fig. 2. (a) and (b) are energy band diagrams for the positive and negative sample biases,respectively. EF,S and EF,T represent the Fermi levels of sample and tip,respectively; (c) The blue lines are the calculated variation of surface potential of HgCdTe with the sample bias by TIBB model. The dashed line designates the variation of Fermi level of tip,whose intercrosses with the blue lines define the onsets of tunneling current and their distance as designated by the horizontal arrow predicts the apparent band gap measured.
    :The comparison of the calculation (red dotted line) with four experimental I-V spectra (black solid lines) measured under the imaging bias of 0.32 V.
    Fig. 3. :The comparison of the calculation (red dotted line) with four experimental I-V spectra (black solid lines) measured under the imaging bias of 0.32 V.
    :The comparison of the calculation (red solid line) with four experimental I-V spectra (black solid lines) measured under the imaging bias of 1.60 V.
    Fig. 4. :The comparison of the calculation (red solid line) with four experimental I-V spectra (black solid lines) measured under the imaging bias of 1.60 V.
    带隙/eV0.27
    针尖-样品距离/nm0.66
    掺杂浓度/cm-31.5×1016

    电子有效质量

    轻空穴有效质量

    重空穴有效质量

    0.0024
    0.1
    0.55
    表面态密度/cm-2eV-11×1011
    电子亲和能/eV4.6
    接触势/eV0.093
    Table 1. Main parameters for the calculation with the TIBB model
    Zheng-Qiong XIAO, Hao-Guang DAI, Xin-Yang LIU, Ping-Ping CHEN, Fang-Xing ZHA. The scanning tunneling spectra of Hg0.72Cd0.28Te and the model interpretation[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2024, 43(3): 300
    Download Citation