Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) entanglement plays a crucial role in quantum information processing, such as quantum communication, quantum computation, and quantum precision measurement [1–5]. Besides entanglement, quantum steering, which stands between entanglement [1] and Bell nonlocality [6] in the hierarchy of quantum correlations [7], has been identified as a useful quantum resource. Different from entanglement and Bell nonlocality, quantum steering shows unique asymmetry or even one-way characteristics [8–16] and, thus, allows asymmetric quantum information processing. For example, quantum steering enables one-side device-independent quantum key distribution [17–19].
Multiplexing provides an efficient method to enhance the data-carrying capability in both classical and quantum communication systems by combining multiple channels into a single channel. By utilizing different degrees of freedom (DOFs) of light, such as wavelength [20,21], polarization [22], temporal [23–25] or spatial [26,27] modes, different types of multiplexing can be realized. Orbital angular momentum (OAM) of light [28] has also been found to be an attractive DOF to realize multiplexing due to its infinite range of possibly achievable topological charges [29,30]. OAM has found applications in discrete-variable quantum information processing, such as high-dimensional OAM entanglement generation [31], and 18-qubit entanglement with six photons’ three DOFs including OAM [32].
Four-wave mixing (FWM) process in warm alkali vapor cell has found a wide range of applications [33–39]. Especially, spatial-multi-mode advantage of the FWM process, attributed to its cavity-free configuration, makes it an ideal optical parametric amplifier to generate entangled images [35] and reconfigurable multipartite entanglement [36]. Quantum correlated twin beams carrying OAM were generated based on the FWM process in rubidium vapor [37]. OAM multiplexed bipartite and multipartite continuous-variable (CV) entangled states have been generated based on the FWM process [40–42]. Furthermore, OAM multiplexed deterministic all-optical quantum teleportation has also been demonstrated by utilizing the OAM multiplexed bipartite CV entangled state generated from the FWM process [43]. To enhance the data-carrying capacity in quantum communication based on OAM multiplexed CV entangled states, it is essential to distribute them in lossy and noisy quantum channels towards practical applications. The distributions of weak coherent field and single photons carrying OAM in fiber, free space, and underwater have been experimentally investigated [44–46]. However, it remains unclear whether the quantum entanglement and steering of OAM multiplexed CV entangled states are more sensitive to loss and noise than a commonly used Gaussian mode with .
Sign up for Photonics Research TOC. Get the latest issue of Photonics Research delivered right to you!Sign up now
Here, we present the deterministic distribution of OAM multiplexed CV quantum entanglement and steering in lossy and noisy channels. In the experiment, the OAM multiplexed entangled fields are generated deterministically based on the FWM process in warm cesium vapor and distributed deterministically in quantum channels. We show that the CV entangled states carrying topological charges and are as robust against loss as the Gaussian mode with . Sudden death of entanglement and quantum steering of a high-order OAM multiplexed CV entangled state is observed in the presence of noise. Our results pave the way for applying OAM multiplexed CV entanglement and quantum steering in high data-carrying capacity quantum communication.
2. PRINCIPLE AND EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
Figure 1(a) shows the schematic of the experimental setup, and Fig. 1(b) shows the double- energy-level structure used for the FWM process, which is formed from the line with an excited level () and two ground levels ( and ). The pump beam is about 1.6-GHz blue detuned from transition, and the probe beam is 9.2-GHz redshifted relative to the pump beam. The pump and probe beams are combined by a GL and then cross each other in the center of the cesium vapor cell at an angle of 6 mrad [47]. The gain of the FWM process is around 3 with a pump power of 240 mW and a probe power of 3 μW. By injecting the probe beam carrying topological charge of the OAM mode, a conjugate beam carrying topological charge of the OAM mode is generated on the other side of the pump, which satisfies OAM conservation in the FWM process. The topological charge of the OAM mode or is added to the probe beam by passing it through a VPP. The pump beam is filtered out by using a GT with an extinction ratio of after the vapor cell.
Figure 1.(a) Experimental setup for the generation and distribution of OAM multiplexed CV quantum entanglement and steering in a lossy or noisy channel. Pr, probe beam; Conj, conjugate beam;
The Conj field is kept by Alice, whereas the Pr field is distributed to a remote quantum node owned by Bob through a lossy or noisy channel. The lossy channel is simulated by an HWP and a PBS. The noisy channel is modeled by combining the Pr field with an auxiliary beam at a PBS followed by an HWP and a PBS. The auxiliary beam carries the same frequency and topological charge as the Pr field and is modulated by an AM and a PM with white noise [16]. To characterize the OAM multiplexed CV entangled state, its covariance matrix is experimentally measured by utilizing two sets of BHDs. In order to extract the CV quadrature information carried by the OAM mode with a topological charge , an LO with opposite topological charge is required. In our experiment, the spatially mode-matched LO beams used in the BHDs are obtained from a second set of FWM processes which is around 5 mm above the first set of FWM processes in the same vapor cell [35]. More details of the experimental parameters can be found in Appendix B.
The Hamiltonian of the OAM multiplexed FWM process can be expressed as [40]
All Gaussian properties of the CV entangled state can be determined by the covariance matrix with matrix element , where , , and represent amplitude and phase quadratures of the Conj and Pr fields, respectively. The covariance matrix of the OAM multiplexed entangled state after distribution in a lossy or noisy channel is as follows:
The Peres–Horodecki criterion of positivity under the partial transpose (PPT) criterion is a sufficient and necessary criterion to characterize the entanglement of CV bipartite entanglement [48]. If the smallest symplectic eigenvalue of the partially transposed covariance matrix is smaller than 1, bipartite entanglement exists. Otherwise, it is a separable state. Furthermore, smaller represents stronger entanglement.
Quantum steering for bipartite Gaussian states of CV systems can be quantified by [49]
3. RESULTS
To verify the OAM property of the optical fields, we measure the spatial beam patterns of quantum states and transmitted through a lossy channel, which are shown in the top rows of Figs. 2(a) and 2(b), respectively. It is obvious that the Pr and Conj fields are both Laguerre–Gaussian beams. To infer their topological charges, they are passed through a tilted lens and imaged on a camera. As shown in the bottom rows of Figs. 2(a) and 2(b), the number of dark stripes gives the number of the topological charge, and the direction gives its sign [50]. As the transmission efficiency of the Pr field decreases, its optical intensity also decreases, whereas its topological charge remains unchanged. Additional beam patterns of the Pr and Conj fields can be found in Appendix D.
Figure 2.(a) and (b) Beam patterns of the OAM multiplexed CV entanglement for
The covariance matrices of the OAM multiplexed entangled states are reconstructed by measuring the noise variances of the amplitude and phase quadratures of the Conj and Pr fields , , , , as well as their correlation variances of amplitude and phase quadratures and , respectively. Details about the measurement of the covariance matrices can be found in Appendix C. Based on the covariance matrix of each OAM multiplexed entangled state at different loss and noise levels, its quantum entanglement and quantum steering characteristics are evaluated experimentally.
Figure 2(c) shows the dependence of PPT values of the CV bipartite entangled state carrying different topological charges on the transmission efficiency of the Pr field. The correlation and anticorrelation levels of the initial CV entangled states carrying topological charges , , and are all around and 6.1 dB, which correspond to and , respectively. The entanglement between Pr and Conj fields degrades as the transmission efficiency decreases. However, the entanglement is robust against loss, i.e., it always exists until the transmission efficiency reaches 0. It is obvious that the CV bipartite entangled state carrying topological charges and is as robust to loss as its Gaussian counterpart .
Figure 3 shows the dependence of PPT values of the CV bipartite entangled state carrying different topological charges in noisy channels. Compared with the results in Fig. 2(c), the entanglement disappears at a certain transmission efficiency of the Pr field in the presence of excess noise, which demonstrates the sudden death of CV quantum entanglement. Furthermore, the higher the excess noise is, the sooner entanglement disappears. The transmission efficiencies where entanglement starts to disappear are , and 0.44, respectively, for the excess noise , and 1 in the units of shot-noise level (SNL). We show that OAM multiplexed CV entangled states carrying high-order topological charges and exhibit the same decoherence tendencies as their Gaussian counterpart in noisy channels.
Figure 3.Dependence of PPT values of the OAM multiplexed CV entanglement on transmission efficiency
The dependence of steerabilities and on the transmission efficiency and topological charge in lossy and noisy channels is shown in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b), respectively. In a lossy channel, the steerabilities for both directions always decrease when the transmission efficiency decreases. One-way steering is observed in the region of for the OAM multiplexed CV entangled state carrying different topological charges , , and . In a noisy channel where the excess noise (in the units of SNL) exists, the steerabilities and are lower than those in the lossy channel [13,51]. Furthermore, Alice loses steerability in the region of , whereas Bob loses steerability in the region of , which confirms sudden death of quantum steering in a noisy channel [51]. It is worth noting that the CV entangled state carrying topological charges and has the same steerabilities as its counterpart .
Figure 4.Quantum steerabilities of OAM multiplexed CV entangled state distributed in a (a) lossy or (b) noisy channel. The excess noise shown in (b) is
4. CONCLUSION
The distribution of OAM multiplexed CV entanglement and quantum steering in quantum channels with homogeneous loss and noise, such as fiber channels, was experimentally simulated in our paper. There were also other quantum channels with inhomogeneous loss and noise, such as atmospheric turbulence and diffraction. Recently, it was shown that other optical fields carrying OAM, such as vector beams, were turbulence resilient in atmospheric turbulence [52]. Thus, it is worthwhile to investigate the turbulence-resilient characteristics of OAM multiplexed CV quantum entanglement and steering, which have the potential to substantially improve the quantum communication distance and fidelity.
To summarize, we experimentally demonstrated quantum steering of OAM multiplexed optical fields and investigated the distribution of OAM multiplexed CV entanglement and quantum steering in quantum channels. We showed that the decoherence property of CV entanglement and quantum steering of the OAM multiplexed optical fields carrying topological charges and were the same as that of the counterpart Gaussian mode with in lossy and noisy channels. The sudden death of entanglement and quantum steering of high-order OAM multiplexed optical fields was observed in the presence of excess noise. Our results demonstrated the feasibility to improve the quantum communication capacity in practical quantum channels by utilizing OAM multiplexed CV entanglement and quantum steering.
APPENDIX A: THEORETICAL MODEL
The Hamiltonian of the OAM multiplexed FWM process can be expressed as
The pump field is much stronger than the Pr and Conj fields in the FWM process, so it can be regarded as a classical field. By combining the intensity of the pump field with , i.e., , and taking , the Hamiltonian can be simplified as [
The output state of the OAM multiplexed FWM process is as follows:
All Gaussian properties of the CV Gaussian entangled state can be determined by its covariance matrix with the matrix element , where , and and represent amplitude and phase quadratures of the Conj and Pr fields.
The covariance matrix of the CV bipartite entangled state can be written as
Then, we consider the distribution of CV entangled state in a lossy or noisy channel. Let and represent the annihilation operators of the Pr and Conj fields, respectively. After the Pr field is distributed in a lossy channel, it becomes , where represents the vacuum state with a variance of 1. Similarly, the Pr field becomes after it is distributed in a noisy channel with excess noise [
APPENDIX B: DETAILS OF THE EXPERIMENT
The Ti:sapphire laser (Coherent MBR-110) is about 1.6 GHz blue detuned from the D1 line transition with a total power of 1.2 W. As shown in Fig.
Figure 5.Detailed experimental schematic for distributing OAM multiplexed CV entanglement in a noisy channel. The lossy channel is realized by blocking the auxiliary beam. D-shaped mirrors (DMs) are utilized to combine or separate light beams with small distances. HWP, half-wave plate; PBS, polarization beam splitter; EOM, electro-optic modulator; VPP, vortex phase plate; GL, Glan-laser polarizer; GT, Glan–Thompson polarizer; Pr, probe beam; Conj, conjugate beam; AM, amplitude modulator; PM, phase modulator; M, mirror; DM, D-shaped mirror; PZT, piezoelectric ceramics; BS, 50:50 beam splitter; BHD, balanced homodyne detector; SA, spectrum analyzer.
The two sets of FWM processes are constructed in the same cesium vapor cell with a height difference of 5 mm. The bottom FWM process is used to generate the OAM multiplexed CV entangled state, whereas the top FWM process is used to generate spatially matched LOs with Pr and Conj fields. The pump power in the bottom FWM process for generating OAM multiplexed CV entanglement is 240 mW. The probe gain of the bottom FWM process is around 3, and the degree of initially generated CV entanglement is around . The pump power and seed probe power of the top FWM processes are 450 mW and 100 μW, respectively, so that the SNL is around 10 dB higher than the electronic noise of the homodyne detector. The bottom FWM process is weakly seeded with a probe power of around 3 μW for relative phase locking of the Pr/Conj fields and their LOs in the balanced homodyne detections.
The lossy channel is simulated by and . The noisy channel is modeled by combining the vertically polarized Pr field with a horizontally polarized auxiliary beam at followed by and . The auxiliary beam carries the same frequency and topological charge as the Pr field and is modulated by an AM and a PM with excess noise at 1.2 MHz. The amount of excess noise is adjusted by tuning the amplitude of the signal applied to the AM and PM and evaluated in the units of SNL. For example, excess noise corresponds to a noise level that is 3 dB higher than the SNL. By tuning , the lower the transmission efficiency of the Pr field, the higher the excess noise coupled to the Pr field. In practical quantum communication protocols, higher excess noise is coupled to the quantum entangled state as the communication distance increases, accompanying lower transmission efficiency. Therefore, our experimental setting is similar to the realistic scenarios in the practical noisy quantum channel. To characterize the OAM multiplexed CV entangled state, its covariance matrix is experimentally obtained by utilizing two sets of BHDs (Thorlabs PDB450A). The interference visibilities for the two sets of BHDs are both around 99%. The electrical gains of these two BHDs are both . The original photodiodes are replaced by high quantum efficiency (QE) photodiodes with at 895 nm (first sensor). To measure amplitude quadrature or phase quadrature of the Pr/Conj fields, the relative phases between them and their LOs are locked by applying the feedback signal from proportional-integral–derivative circuits and high-voltage amplifiers to PZTs.
APPENDIX C: MEASUREMENT OF COVARIANCE MATRIX
To reconstruct the covariance matrix of the CV quantum entangled state, we perform six different measurements on the output optical modes. These measurements include the variances of the amplitude and phase quadratures of Conj and Pr fields , , , , as well as noise variances of their joint amplitude and phase quadratures and , respectively. and ( and ) are experimentally measured by locking the relative phase of the Conj (Pr) field, and its corresponding local oscillator of () at amplitude quadrature or phase quadrature. and are experimentally measured by locking the relative phases of and at amplitude quadrature or phase quadrature and then subtracting or adding the photocurrents with a radio-frequency subtractor or adder. SNL is achieved by blocking the Pr and/or Conj fields so that only the noise of vacuum is measured. The settings of the SA (Agilent E4411B) are 30-kHz resolution bandwidth, 100-Hz video bandwidth, and zero span at 1.2 MHz.
Figure
Figure 6.Measured quantum correlation noises for initially generated OAM multiplexed CV entangled states carrying topological charges (a)
With the measured six noise variances, the cross-correlation matrix elements are calculated via
In the experiment, we obtain all the covariance matrices of quantum states with different transmission efficiencies and excess noise and then calculate the smallest symplectic eigenvalue of the partially transposed covariance matrices and to verify whether quantum entanglement and quantum steering exist.
APPENDIX D: SUPPLEMENTAL BEAM PATTERNS
Supplemental beam patterns of the OAM modes of Pr and Conj beams generated from the FWM process are shown in Fig.
Figure 7.Images of OAM modes of the Pr beam and Conj beam generated from the FWM process. (a)
References
[1] R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, K. Horodecki. Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys., 81, 865-942(2009).
[2] S. L. Braunstein, P. van Loock. Quantum information with continuous variables. Rev. Mod. Phys., 77, 513-577(2005).
[3] H. J. Kimble. The quantum internet. Nature, 453, 1023-1030(2008).
[4] C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. García-Patrón, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, S. Lloyd. Gaussian quantum information. Rev. Mod. Phys., 84, 621-669(2012).
[5] X. Wang, T. Hiroshima, A. Tomita, M. Hayashi. Quantum information with Gaussian states. Phys. Rep., 448, 1-111(2007).
[6] J. S. Bell. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics, 1, 195-200(1964).
[7] R. Uola, A. C. S. Costa, H. C. Nguyen, O. Gühne. Quantum steering. Rev. Mod. Phys., 92, 015001(2020).
[8] H. M. Wiseman, S. J. Jones, A. C. Doherty. Steering, entanglement, nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, 140402(2007).
[9] V. Händchen, T. Eberle, S. Steinlechner, A. Samblowski, T. Franz, R. F. Werner, R. Schnabel. Observation of one-way Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering. Nat. Photonics, 6, 596-599(2012).
[10] S. Armstrong, M. Wang, R. Y. Teh, Q. Gong, Q. He, J. Janousek, H. A. Bachor, M. D. Reid, P. K. Lam. Multipartite Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering and genuine tripartite entanglement with optical networks. Nat. Phys., 11, 167-172(2015).
[11] S. Wollmann, N. Walk, A. J. Bennet, H. M. Wiseman, G. J. Pryde. Observation of genuine one-way Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 160403(2016).
[12] K. Sun, X.-J. Ye, J.-S. Xu, X.-Y. Xu, J.-S. Tang, Y.-C. Wu, J.-L. Chen, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo. Experimental quantification of asymmetric Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 160404(2016).
[13] Z. Qin, X. Deng, C. Tian, M. Wang, X. Su, C. Xie, K. Peng. Manipulating the direction of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering. Phys. Rev. A, 95, 052114(2017).
[14] Y. Xiao, X.-J. Ye, K. Sun, J.-S. Xu, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo. Demonstration of multisetting one-way Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering in two-qubit systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 118, 140404(2017).
[15] A. Cavaillès, H. Le Jeannic, J. Raskop, G. Guccione, D. Markham, E. Diamanti, M. D. Shaw, V. B. Verma, S. W. Nam, J. Laurat. Demonstration of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering using hybrid continuous- and discrete-variable entanglement of light. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121, 170403(2018).
[16] M. Wang, Y. Xiang, H. Kang, D. Han, Y. Liu, Q. He, Q. Gong, X. Su, K. Peng. Deterministic distribution of multipartite entanglement and steering in a quantum network by separable states. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125, 260506(2020).
[17] C. Branciard, E. G. Cavalcanti, S. P. Walborn, V. Scarani, H. M. Wiseman. One-sided device-independent quantum key distribution: security, feasibility, and the connection with steering. Phys. Rev. A, 85, 010301(2012).
[18] T. Gehring, V. Händchen, J. Duhme, F. Furrer, T. Franz, C. Pacher, R. F. Werner, R. Schnabel. Implementation of continuous-variable quantum key distribution with composable and one-sided-device-independent security against coherent attacks. Nat. Commun., 6, 8795(2015).
[19] N. Walk, S. Hosseini, J. Geng, O. Thearle, J. Y. Haw, S. Armstrong, S. M. Assad, J. Janousek, T. C. Ralph, T. Symul, H. M. Wiseman, P. K. Lam. Experimental demonstration of Gaussian protocols for one-sided device-independent quantum key distribution. Optica, 3, 634-642(2016).
[20] M. Pysher, Y. Miwa, R. Shahrokhshahi, R. Bloomer, O. Pfister. Parallel generation of quadripartite cluster entanglement in the optical frequency comb. Phys. Rev. Lett., 107, 030505(2011).
[21] J. Roslund, R. M. de Araújo, S. Jiang, C. Fabre, N. Treps. Wavelength-multiplexed quantum networks with ultrafast frequency combs. Nat. Photonics, 8, 109-112(2014).
[22] H. Liu, J. Wang, H. Ma, S. Sun. Polarization-multiplexing-based measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution without phase reference calibration. Optica, 5, 902-909(2018).
[23] S. Yokoyama, R. Ukai, S. C. Armstrong, C. Sornphiphatphong, T. Kaji, S. Suzuki, J. Yoshikawa, H. Yonezawa, N. C. Menicucci, A. Furusawa. Ultra-large-scale continuous-variable cluster states multiplexed in the time domain. Nat. Photonics, 7, 982-986(2013).
[24] A. Marandi, Z. Wang, K. Takata, R. L. Byer, Y. Yamamoto. Network of time-multiplexed optical parametric oscillators as a coherent Ising machine. Nat. Photonics, 8, 937-942(2014).
[25] M. Larsen, X. Guo, C. Breum, J. Neergaard-Nielsen, U. Andersen. Deterministic generation of a two-dimensional cluster state. Science, 366, 369-372(2019).
[26] D. J. Richardson, J. M. Fini, L. E. Nelson. Space-division multiplexing in optical fibres. Nat. Photonics, 7, 354-362(2013).
[27] Y. Pu, Y. Wu, N. Jiang, W. Chang, C. Li, S. Zhang, L. Duan. Experimental entanglement of 25 individually accessible atomic quantum interfaces. Sci. Adv., 4, eaar3931(2018).
[28] L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. C. Spreeuw, J. P. Woerdman. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes. Phys. Rev. A, 45, 8185-8189(1992).
[29] J. Wang, J. Yang, I. M. Fazal, N. Ahmed, Y. Yan, H. Huang, Y. Ren, Y. Yue, S. Dolinar, M. Tur, A. E. Willner. Terabit free-space data transmission employing orbital angular momentum multiplexing. Nat. Photonics, 6, 488-496(2012).
[30] N. Bozinovic, Y. Yue, Y. Ren, M. Tur, P. Kristensen, H. Huang, A. E. Willner, S. Ramachandran. Terabit-scale orbital angular momentum mode division multiplexing in fibers. Science, 340, 1545-1548(2013).
[31] R. Fickler, G. Campbell, B. Buchler, P. K. Lam, A. Zeilinger. Quantum entanglement of angular momentum states with quantum numbers up to 10,010. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 13642-13647(2016).
[32] X. L. Wang, Y. H. Luo, H. L. Huang, M. C. Chen, Z. E. Su, C. Liu, C. Chen, W. Li, Y. Q. Fang, X. Jiang, J. Zhang, L. Li, N. L. Liu, C. Y. Lu, J. W. Pan. 18-qubit entanglement with six photons’ three degrees of freedom. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120, 260502(2018).
[33] Z. Qin, A. S. Prasad, T. Brannan, A. MacRae, A. Lezama, A. I. Lvovsky. Complete temporal characterization of a single photon. Light Sci. Appl., 4, e298(2015).
[34] Z. Qin, L. Cao, H. Wang, A. M. Marino, W. Zhang, J. Jing. Experimental generation of multiple quantum correlated beams from hot rubidium vapor. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 023602(2014).
[35] V. Boyer, A. M. Marino, R. C. Pooser, P. D. Lett. Entangled images from four-wave mixing. Science, 321, 544-547(2008).
[36] K. Zhang, W. Wang, S. Liu, X. Pan, J. Du, Y. Lou, S. Yu, S. Lv, N. Treps, C. Fabre, J. Jing. Reconfigurable hexapartite entanglement by spatially multiplexed four-wave mixing processes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 124, 090501(2020).
[37] A. M. Marino, V. Boyer, R. C. Pooser, P. D. Lett, K. Lemons, K. M. Jones. Delocalized correlations in twin light beams with orbital angular momentum. Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, 093602(2008).
[38] F. Hudelist, J. Kong, C. Liu, J. Jing, Z. Y. Ou, W. Zhang. Quantum metrology with parametric amplifier-based photon correlation interferometers. Nat. Commun., 5, 3049(2014).
[39] R. C. Pooser, B. Lawrie. Ultrasensitive measurement of microcantilever displacement below the shot-noise limit. Optica, 2, 393-399(2015).
[40] X. Pan, S. Yu, Y. Zhou, K. Zhang, K. Zhang, S. Lv, S. Li, W. Wang, J. Jing. Orbital-angular-momentum multiplexed continuous-variable entanglement from four-wave mixing in hot atomic vapor. Phys. Rev. Lett., 123, 070506(2019).
[41] S. Li, X. Pan, Y. Ren, H. Liu, S. Yu, J. Jing. Deterministic generation of orbital-angular-momentum multiplexed tripartite entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett., 124, 083605(2020).
[42] W. Wang, K. Zhang, J. Jing. Large-scale quantum network over 66 orbital angular momentum optical modes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125, 140501(2020).
[43] S. Liu, Y. Lou, J. Jing. Orbital angular momentum multiplexed deterministic all-optical quantum teleportation. Nat. Commun., 11, 3875(2020).
[44] D. Cozzolino, E. Polino, M. Valeri, G. Carvacho, D. Bacco, N. Spagnolo, L. Oxenløwe, F. Sciarrino. Air-core fiber distribution of hybrid vector vortex-polarization entangled states. Adv. Photon., 1, 046005(2019).
[45] G. Vallone, V. D’Ambrosio, A. Sponselli, S. Slussarenko, L. Marrucci, F. Sciarrino, P. Villoresi. Free-space quantum key distribution by rotation-invariant twisted photons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 060503(2014).
[46] Y. Chen, W. Shen, Z. Li, C. Hu, Z. Yan, Z. Jiao, J. Gao, M. Cao, K. Sun, X. Jin. Underwater transmission of high-dimensional twisted photons over 55 meters. PhotoniX, 1, 5(2020).
[47] R. Ma, W. Liu, Z. Qin, X. Su, X. Jia, J. Zhang, J. Gao. Compact sub-kilohertz low-frequency quantum light source based on four-wave mixing in cesium vapor. Opt. Lett., 43, 1243-1246(2018).
[48] R. Simon. Peres-Horodecki separability criterion for continuous variable systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 2726-2729(2000).
[49] I. Kogias, A. R. Lee, S. Ragy, G. Adesso. Quantification of Gaussian quantum steering. Phys. Rev. Lett., 114, 060403(2015).
[50] P. Vaity, J. Banerji, R. P. Singh. Measuring the topological charge of an optical vortex by using a tilted convex lens. Phys. Lett. A, 377, 1154-1156(2013).
[51] X. Deng, Y. Liu, M. Wang, X. Su, K. Peng. Sudden death and revival of Gaussian Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering in noisy channels. npj Quantum Inf., 7, 65(2021).
[52] Z. Zhu, M. Janasik, A. Fyffe, D. Hay, Y. Zhou, B. Kantor, T. Winder, R. W. Boyd, G. Leuchs, Z. Shi. Compensation-free high-dimensional free-space optical communication using turbulence-resilient vector beam. Nat. Commun., 12, 1666(2021).
Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address