Author Affiliations
1State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China2Shanghai Water Affairs Bureau, Shanghai 200050, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Sketch of the Yangtze River Estuary displaying the location of measuring stations
Fig. 2. Correlation between the daily mean tidal ranges of Xuliujing and Qinglonggang stations
Fig. 3. Chlorinity of Dongfengxisha observation point, discharge at Datong station and tidal ranges at Xuliujing station in the dry seasons of 2009-2014
Fig. 4. Relationship between the discharge at Datong station and the tidal range at Xuliujing station (Red line across the data points represents the trend line between the two variables.)
Fig. 5. Relationship between lunar calendar date and daily mean tidal range at (a) Xuliujing station and (b) Qinglonggang station (Curves of different colors represent different tidal range estimation modes.)
Fig. 6. Characteristics of river discharge at Datong station in dry seasons of three different periods: (a) multi-year average monthly discharge; (b) the maximum and the minimum discharge in every month (Total height represents the maximum value of each month. Colored fill portion represents the minimum value of each month. Red represents the period of 1950-2002, brown represents the period of 2003-2007, blue represents the period of 2008-2017)
Fig. 7. Characteristics of saltwater intrusion under different river discharges: (a) relationship between daily discharge at Datong station and daily chlorinity at the Dongfengxisha observation point, (b) probability of chlorinity exceeding the drinking water standard in each discharge interval, and (c) the discharge at Datong station vs the cumulative probability of excessive chlorinity
Fig. 8. Tidal range of Xuliujing station vs chlorinity of Dongfengxisha observation point: (a) data of all discharges, and (b) data corresponding to the river discharge of approximately 11,000 m3/s
Fig. 9. Accumulative frequency of the tidal range of Xuliujing station
Fig. 10. Comparison of the measured and calculated salinity values using different empirical models
Fig. 11. Calculated chlorinity processes of the Dongfengxisha observation point under different river discharges (t denotes the duration when chlorinity exceeds the required drinking water standard)
Data type | Station | Period | Source |
---|
Daily discharge | Datong | 1950-2017 | Yangtze River Hydrographic Yearbook | Daily mean tidal range | Xuliujing | 2009, 2011-2014 | Yangtze River Hydrographic Yearbook | Daily mean tidal range | Qinglonggang | Certain months in 2005, 2009, 2011, 2014 and 2017 | Jiangsu Provincial Hydrology and Water Resources Bureau, Zheng et al. (2014) | Daily mean chlorinity | Dongfengxisha | 2009-2014 | Shanghai Water Affairs Bureau |
|
Source | Relationship | Variable explanation |
---|
Mao et al.(1993) | S~exp(ΔHα/Qβ) | S is the salinity of Baogang; ∆H is the tidal range of Qinglonggang; Q is the discharge at Datong station. | Zheng et al.(2014) | S=aebΔH+ aebΔH(c1Q3+ c2Q2+c3Q+c4) | S is the salinity of Qinglonggang station; ∆H is the tidal range of Qinglonggang station; Q is the discharge at Datong station. | Chen et al.(2013b) | S=(4.16×10‒9Q2‒2.745Q+4.317)×0.02404×e0.009085ΔH | S is the salinity of Chenhang; ∆H is the tidal range of Qinglonggang station; Q is the discharge at Datong station. | Sun et al.(2017) | C=Aexp(aΔH0‒bQ) | ΔH0 is the tidal range of Xuliujing station; Q is the discharge at Datong station; C is the chlorinity of Dongfengxisha. |
|
Table 2. Selected empirical models for salinity prediction in the upper South Branch of the Yangtze River Estuary
Measured time | Cumulative frequency of less than a certain value of discharge (%) |
---|
< 25000 m3/s | < 15000 m3/s | < 12000 m3/s | < 10000 m3/s |
---|
1950-2002 | 45.71 | 25.71 | 16.9 | 10.06 | 2003-2007 | 55.83 | 24.85 | 14.29 | 2.74 | 2008-2017 | 50.33 | 21.59 | 7.73 | 0.1 |
|
Table 3. Frequency of daily discharge at Datong station in different periods
Measured time | Observation point | Salinity excessive days (d) | Average discharge at Datong station during the salinity excessive periods (m³/s) | Data source |
---|
Winter of 1978-Spring of 1979 | Wusong | 64 | 7256 | Shen et al.(2002) | February-March 1987 | Chenhang | 13 | 8467 | Gu et al.(2003), Chen et al.(2011), Xu and Yuan(1994) | February-March 1999 | 25 | 9487 | Shen et al.(2002), Gu et al.(2003) | February 2004 | 9.8 | 9479 | He et al.(2006) | October 2006 | 9 | 14,300 | Zhu et al.(2010) | February 2014 | 19 | 10,900 | Wang (2016) | November 3-12, 2009 | Dongfengxisha | 10 | 14,030 | Shanghai Water Affairs Bureau | November 15-24, 2013 | 10 | 12,240 | December 3-11, 2013 | 9 | 12,500 | December 17-25, 2013 | 9 | 11,365 | January 2-10, 2014 | 9 | 12,144 | January 30-February 22, 2014 | 24 | 11,138 |
|
Table 4. Statistical features of certain saltwater intrusion events in the upper South Branch of the Yangtze River Estuary in recent decades
Chlorinity of Dongfengxisha observation point (mg/L) | Discharge at Datong station Qc (m³/s) | Daily tidal range of Xuliujing station ∆Hc (m) |
---|
250 | 11,000 | 2.05 | 250 | 12,000 | 2.24 | 250 | 13,000 | 2.42 | 250 | 15,000 | 2.61 |
|
Table 5. Corresponding tidal ranges of Xuliujing station (∆Hc) and discharges of Datong station (Qc) to maintain the drinking water standard
Empirical salinity prediction model | Tidal range estimation mode | Determination coefficient R2 | Tidal range estimation mode | Determination coefficient R2 |
---|
Mao et al. (1993) | Qinglonggang station, curve B | 0.45 | Qinglonggang station, curve C | 0.51 | Zheng et al. (2014) | Qinglonggang station, curve B | 0.85 | Qinglonggangstation, curve C | 0.88 | Chen et al. (2013b) | Qinglonggang station, curve B | 0.7 | Qinglonggang station, curve C | 0.74 | Sun et al. (2017) | Xuliujing station, curve B | 0.8 | Xuliujing station, curve C | 0.81 |
|
Table 6. Determination coefficient between measured and calculated salinity using different tidal range estimation modes and different empirical salinity prediction models
Empirical model | Location of chlorinity prediction | Tidal range estimation mode | Calculated critical discharge (m3/s) |
---|
Mao et al. (1993) | Baogang | Curve C | 12,000 | Chen et al. (2013b) | Chenhang | Curve C | 11,000 | Sun et al. (2017) | Dongfengxisha | Curve C | 11,500 |
|
Table 7. Critical discharges calculated using different empirical models