• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 20, 2015007 (2021)
Na Li1、2, Kuangang Fan1、2、*, Yahui Liu1、2, and Qinghua Ouyang1、2
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Magnetic Levitation Technology in Jiangxi Province, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.2015007 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Na Li, Kuangang Fan, Yahui Liu, Qinghua Ouyang. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Detection Based on ASRPCA Fused with Five-Frame Difference[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(20): 2015007 Copy Citation Text show less
    Flow chart of improved algorithm
    Fig. 1. Flow chart of improved algorithm
    Comparison results of UAV detection using different algorithms under different background sequences
    Fig. 2. Comparison results of UAV detection using different algorithms under different background sequences
    Gaussian noise detection results with different variances
    Fig. 3. Gaussian noise detection results with different variances
    VideoFive-Frame Difference+ViBe+Optical Flow+GMM+TVRPCAProposed algorithm
    RPFRPFRPFRPFRPFRPF
    (a)0.850.910.890.920.750.830.890.830.860.620.900.730.870.940.900.910.930.92
    (b)0.460.830.590.880.740.800.810.630.710.820.660.730.860.840.850.920.910.91
    (c)0.580.790.670.860.700.770.870.710.780.630.770.700.850.860.850.890.850.87
    (d)0.530.870.660.840.730.780.920.720.810.630.810.710.860.810.830.910.920.91
    (e)0.370.880.520.890.620.730.900.890.890.590.800.680.890.900.890.940.930.93
    (f)0.790.850.820.710.800.750.920.490.640.110.570.180.840.830.830.870.850.86
    (g)0.510.860.640.810.790.800.790.800.790.210.870.330.860.890.870.930.880.90
    Table 1. Measured value P,R,F of various algorithms
    AlgorithmVarianceRPF
    0.0010.460.810.59
    Five-Frame Difference+0.0050.460.780.58
    0.010.460.540.50
    0.020.470.360.41
    0.0010.820.660.73
    GMM+0.0050.820.620.71
    0.010.810.530.64
    0.020.810.500.62
    0.0010.880.740.80
    ViBe+0.0050.880.630.73
    0.010.870.550.67
    0.020.850.430.57
    0.0010.910.880.89
    TVRPCA0.0050.900.850.87
    0.010.900.820.85
    0.020.890.780.83
    0.0010.860.630.71
    Optical Flow+0.0050.860.630.71
    0.010.860.630.71
    0.020.860.630.71
    0.0010.920.900.91
    Proposed algorithm0.0050.920.890.90
    0.010.910.880.89
    0.020.910.870.89
    Table 2. Measured value P, R, F of Gaussian noise with different variances
    Algorithm(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)Average
    Five-Frame Difference+24.8025.2327.0224.2426.2826.30
    ViBe+98.7893.4395.8796.1396.4195.12
    Optical Flow+101.14102.62101.98104.34102.82103.27
    GMM+76.5975.3176.5976.2373.7275.69
    TVRPCA256.30236.45255.23232.27246.46226.37
    Proposed algorithm31.1630.7930.2731.3030.0330.71
    Table 3. Comparison of running time of different algorithms unit: s
    Na Li, Kuangang Fan, Yahui Liu, Qinghua Ouyang. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Detection Based on ASRPCA Fused with Five-Frame Difference[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(20): 2015007
    Download Citation