• Frontiers of Optoelectronics
  • Vol. 4, Issue 2, 130 (2011)
[in Chinese]1、* and [in Chinese]2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physics, Rabindra Satabarsiki Mahavidyalaya, Ghatal-721212, West Bengal, India
  • 2Department of Physics & Meteorology, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, West Bengal, India
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1007/s12200-011-0168-3 Cite this Article
    [in Chinese], [in Chinese]. Substrate effect on morphology and photoluminescence from ZnO monopods and bipods[J]. Frontiers of Optoelectronics, 2011, 4(2): 130 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    A simple wet chemical bath deposition has been successfully deployed to fabricate zinc oxide (ZnO) nanostructures. For substrate free growth, the nanostructure is spindle like monopods. But when the nanostructures grow on the glass and quartz substrates, they are bipods (two monopods joined together base to base). Variation in the size of the spindles of the monopods and bipods and the particle size was observed due to the strain exists in the thin film due to lattice mismatch at the interface of the thin film and the substrates. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) and selected area diffraction results confirmed the hexagonal unit cell structures of the monopods and bipods. Also the growth rates of various planes are different and the growth is anisotropic. The substrate free grown monopods show visible photoluminescence (PL) at 421 nm. But the emission gets shifted by 3 and 6 nm for ZnO thin film deposited on quartz and glass substrates respectively due to interfacial strain. In case of ZnO on quartz substrate a strong ultra-violet (UV) peak was observed at 386 nm due to band edge transition. These emissions are also accompanied by few weaker emission peaks due to various defect related transition.
    [in Chinese], [in Chinese]. Substrate effect on morphology and photoluminescence from ZnO monopods and bipods[J]. Frontiers of Optoelectronics, 2011, 4(2): 130
    Download Citation