Over past decades, atomic fountain clocks have been utilized widely as a stable frequency standard in metrology^[1–6]. Cs fountain clocks have greatly improved the accuracy and stability of the International System of Units (SI) second^[7]. The Rb87 fountain clock is more attractive for applications as a secondary representation of the SI second because the collision-induced fractional frequency shift of cold ⁸⁷Rb atoms is smaller than that of Cs133 atoms^[8,9]. Six highly stable and robust Rb fountains currently operate at two ground stations of the Global Positioning System in the United States Naval Observatory^[10]. Presently, the frequency uncertainty of the most accurate fountain clocks in the world is approximately (2–3)×10−16^[11–13]. However, some studies suggested that the frequency uncertainty of fountain clocks can be improved to the order of 10−17. Among several factors affecting the frequency uncertainty of fountain clocks, the second-order Zeeman effect caused by the interaction between the magnetic field and atoms is one of the most important items. To achieve a stable and accurate fountain clock, the influence of this item on the output frequency of the atomic clock must be dealt with carefully.

For a fountain clock, the frequency uncertainty evaluation of the effects on the second-order Zeeman comprises two main aspects, which are the spatial distribution and time fluctuation of the quantization magnetic field in the region of the Ramsey interaction between cold atoms and microwave. Once a fountain atomic clock is integrated, measuring the magnetic field directly is difficult because of the obstacles of the vacuum chamber walls, magnetic shielding, and other structures. Several methods are used to measure the magnetic field indirectly depending on the interaction between the atoms and the magnetic field. They are mainly as follows: (I) low-frequency transition method^[14], (II) magneto-sensitive transition method^[15–17], (III) microwave antenna radiation method^[18], and (IV) stimulated Raman transition method^[19,20]. Each of these methods has its advantages and disadvantages. The Ramsey magneto-sensitive transition method is a good trade-off considering the measurement accuracy and convenience. However, this method requires a high degree of spatial uniformity for the magnetic field to be measured because magnetic-induced broadening mechanisms affect the visibility of the Ramsey fringes^[21].

This paper reports the magnetic field intensity measurement distribution in the cold atoms flight trajectory of a transportable fountain clock. The fountain clock frequency uncertainty caused by spatial inhomogeneity and temporal drift of the magnetic field was evaluated in terms of the magnetic field measurements.

In the presence of a weak external magnetic field, the split of the Rb87 atoms ground state hyperfine energy levels can be described using the Breit–Rabi formula^[22]: (F,mF)=−E02(2I+1)+mFμBgIB±E02(1+x2+4mFx2I+1)12,x=(gJ−gI)μBBΔE0.(1)

In this formula, E0 is the energy of the unperturbed ground state energy level, mF=mI±mJ=mI±1/2 is the quantum number of the magneton energy level, μB=h·1.399624604MHz/G is the Bohr magneton, and B is the magnitude of the external magnetic field.

Under a weak magnetic field for x≤1, Eq. (1) can be approximated as $$\begin{gathered} E(F,mF)=−E02(2I+1)+gIgJ+gImFE0x±E02{1+2mFx2I+1 \\ +x22[1−4mF2(2I+1)2]}. \end{gathered}$$(2)

From Eq. (2), the energy-level differences with different F quantum numbers and magnetic quantum numbers can be expressed as $$\begin{gathered} ΔEF1,mF→F2,mF′=gIgJ+gI(mF−mF′)ΔE0x±ΔE02{2+2(mF+mF′)x2I+1 \\ +x2[1−2(mF2+mF'2)(2I+1)2]}, \end{gathered}$$(3)where ΔE0 is the unperturbed clock transition energy-level difference, ΔE0=hν0; gI and gJ are the g factors of the electron and the nucleus, which are gJ=2.00233113(20) and gI=−9.951414(10)×10−4 for Rb87^[23].

For the clock transition, F=2, mF=0→F=1, mF=0, ΔEF=2,mF=0→F=1,mF=0=ΔE02(2+x2).(4)

Thus, the clock transition frequency under magnetic field perturbation can be written as ν′=ν02(2+x2)=ν0+ν02x2=ν0+575.15×108〈B2〉.(5)

The first term in Eq. (5) is the intrinsic clock frequency, and the second term is the frequency shift due to the second-order Zeeman effect. The frequency shift caused by the first-order Zeeman effect is zero, which is one of the main reasons for choosing this transition as a clock transition.

〈〉 represents the time-averaged value along the drift length. When the C-fields are inhomogeneous, 〈B2〉 is given by 〈B2〉=〈B〉2+σ2. σ2 is the variance of the magnetic field B along the atomic trajectory.

For magneto-sensitive F=2,mF=−1→F=1,mF=−1, ΔυF=2,mF=−1→F=1,mF=−1=ν02(2−x)=ν0−1.4×1010〈B〉.(6)

Hence, ΔυF=2,mF=0→F=1,mF=0υ0=2(ΔυF=2,mF=−1→F=1,mF=−1υ0)2.(7)

For Rb87, it follows from Eqs. (3)–(5) and (7) that Δνsecond zeemanν0=2(Δν(−1,−1)ν0)2+575.15×108σ2υ0.(8)

From the first term in Eq. (8), the uncertainty of the second-order Zeeman shift is dominated by the temporal instability of the magnetic field, which is given by the following: $$\begin{gathered} δ(Δνsecondzeemanν0)=δ[2(Δν(−1,−1)ν0)2] \\ =4×Δν(−1,−1)ν02×δ(Δν(−1,−1)), \end{gathered}$$(9)where δ(Δν(−1,−1)) is the temporal fluctuation of ν(−1,−1).

According to Eq. (8), the relative frequency shift of the second-order Zeeman can be obtained as soon as the central frequency of the (−1, −1) transition is measured experimentally. Furthermore, an evaluation of the second-order Zeeman frequency shift uncertainty comprises two aspects. One is the second-order Zeeman shift uncertainty caused by the measurement error σ2 of the central frequency position and the calculation error of the magnetic field, which can be obtained from the second term of Eq. (8). Additionally, there is uncertainty due to long temporal fluctuations in the magnetic field, which can be derived from Eq. (9). The frequency shift uncertainty can be reduced in two ways. The first method reduces the fluctuations in the magnetic field, which guarantees the stability of the power supply to the C-field current source. When the temporal instability of the magnetic field is lower than 0.2 nT, i.e., the central fringe fluctuates less than 2.8 Hz, the uncertainty is in the order of 10−16. The second way involves reducing the detuning of the (−1, −1) magneto-sensitive transition central fringe from the (0, 0) transition central fringe. This means that the C-field current and the magnitude of the magnetic field in the flight region are reduced. Most fountain clocks in many laboratories have a C-field magnetic field of 100 nT and above, such that the detuning of the (−1, −1) magneto-sensitive transition is approximately 1400 Hz and above. This provides an uncertainty of approximately 3.4×10−16 for magnetic field fluctuations of about 0.2 nT. In the work of this article, the magnetic field was set to approximately 50 nT so that the uncertainty is approximately 1.7×10−16 for the same magnetic field fluctuations. The premise of reducing the intensity of the magnetic field is to ensure that there are no zero magnetic intensity field points in the trajectory of cold atoms after state selection. Otherwise, the Majorana transition will deteriorate the frequency stability of the atomic clock.

The uncertainty of the second-order Zeeman frequency shift can be reduced by appropriately reducing the intensity of the magnetic field and minimizing the fluctuations of the magnetic field with time. This also makes it possible to improve the uncertainty of the second-order Zeeman frequency shift to the order of 10−17.

Figure 1(a) shows the experimental configuration: from top to bottom are the ion pump, the Ramsey interrogation zone, the detection zone, the state-selective zone, and the cooling zone. To provide a uniform vertical upward magnetic field in the Ramsey interaction zone and a free flight zone, the magnetic field coils were designed for the fountain clock, as shown in Fig. 1(b). Nine sets of magnetic field coils were distributed out of the vacuum chamber in the Ramsey interaction zone. One main coil generates a quantization constant magnetic field in the axial direction along the atomic flight trajectory. Four sets of top compensation coils and four sets of bottom compensation coils compensate for inhomogeneities in the magnetic field due to the ends and center of the Lorentz coil. In this manner, a uniform vertical upward magnetic field of approximately 50 nT is generated in the axis of the coil. On the exterior of the magnetic field coils, there are five layers of Permalloy magnetic shields. This magnetic shielding is used to suppress the influence of the environmental external magnetic field on the inner magnetic field of the fountain clock with a shielding factor of approximately 1.5×104. The first and second layers of the magnetic shield cover only the Ramsey interrogation zone, whereas the remaining three layers cover the entire body of the fountain. This can cause the magnetic field in the state-selective zone to be in the opposite direction of the Ramsey interrogation zone. Consequently, for the direction of the magnetic field to be coherent along the atomic flight path, a set of compensation coils was assembled in the area of the state-selective zone to the detection zone, which is in the same direction as the C-field magnetic field.

Based on the method for evaluating the second-order Zeeman frequency shift uncertainty of fountain clocks in Section 2, the spatial distribution of the magnetic field intensity in the free flight zone first needs to be measured. The Ramsey fringes of the magneto-sensitive transition can be obtained using the |F=2,mF=−1〉→|F=1,mF=−1〉 magneto-sensitive transition by applying two π/2 pulses near the |F=2,mF=−1〉→|F=1,mF=−1〉 resonant frequency to the cold atom cloud when it passes through the microwave cavity twice during its upthrow and descent. Figure 2 shows a graphical representation of two magneto-sensitive transitions from the cooling zone at 3.19 and 3.24 m/s, respectively, with the apex of the atomic group upthrown at a distance of 10 and 28 mm above the microwave cavity, respectively. This results in a broad transition spectrum and a high signal-to-noise ratio for the central transition fringe only because the time between the two upthrown velocity groups and the microwave is very short. On the basis of the frequency difference between the central fringe of this spectrum and the |F=2,mF=0〉→|F=1,mF=0〉 transition, average magnetic field intensities of 49.9 and 49.5 nT were inversed in the region of the free upward of the atomic group, respectively.

On the basis of the two Ramsey spectral lines shown above, the launched atoms cloud velocity was increased continuously so that the height of the upthrow was increased by 10 mm each time. The movement of the Ramsey central fringe and the formation of a new fringe were then observed. By measuring the position of the Ramsey central fringe for each ejection velocity, the magnetic field at a single point in the atomic flight trajectory was obtained using the deconvolution method. Figure 3 shows the Ramsey fringes for ejection velocities of 3.94, 3.97, and 4.00 m/s, respectively. The detuning of the Ramsey central fringe was −702.1, −702.1, and −702.9Hz, respectively, and the average magnetic field in the atomic flight trajectory was calculated to be 50.15, 50.15, and 50.2 nT. As the atom passed through the inhomogeneous C-field twice in its trajectory, the position of the central Ramsey fringe was no longer the highest point of the Rabi pedestal, as shown in Fig. 3.

The magnetic field at a single point in the flight trajectory of the atom was obtained using the deconvolution method by measuring the position of the Ramsey central fringe in the flight trajectory. Figure 4 presents a time-averaged magnetic field map. When the fountain is operated with 4 m/s, the central fringe of the |F=2,mF=−1〉→|F=1,mF=−1〉 magneto-sensitive transition is approximately 702.9 Hz relative to the |F=2,mF=0〉→|F=1,mF=0〉 clock transition, and the magnetic field is calculated as 50.22 nT. The peak-to-peak variation of space magnetic field in the Ramsey region is about 0.74 nT. From Eq. (5), the second-order Zeeman frequency shift was calculated to be 2.1×10−14. Consequently, the uncertainty of the second-order Zeeman frequency shift due to the spatial inhomogeneity of the magnetic field was 3.4×10−19 from the second term of Eq. (6), which is negligible compared with order of 10−17.

The temporal instability of the magnetic field 〈B〉 has a major influence on the uncertainty of the second-order Zeeman frequency shift. The clock frequency uncertainty due to the temporal instability of the magnetic field can be obtained by monitoring the fluctuations of the magnetic field at a fixed position over a long time. The launched atoms cloud velocity was set to 4 m/s, corresponding an about 306 mm above the Ramsey cavity. The center Ramsey fringes of the |F=2,mF=−1〉→|F=1,mF=−1〉 magneto-sensitive transition were obtained by sweeping 140 frequency points with a 0.05 Hz step. It took about three minutes to complete a frequency sweep. From Fig. 5, the central Ramsey fringe transition frequency fluctuations were monitored for nearly 2 days. The temporal variation of the center Ramsey frequency did not exceed ±0.85Hz. Thus, using Eq. (9), the calculated uncertainty due to the temporal instability of the magnetic field is about 5.1×10−17.

Thus, the total uncertainty on the second-order Zeeman shift correction is 5.1×10−17, and the typical correction is Δνsecond zeemanν0=(2095.5±5.1)×10−17.(10)

Ramsey fringes with different velocities were obtained using the magneto-sensitive transition method on the basis of a special design of magnetic shielding and magnetic field control parameters for a transportable Rb fountain. The second-order Zeeman frequency shift and the uncertainty of the Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics (SIOM) fountain clock were evaluated using the Ramsey fringes method. The second-order Zeeman frequency shift uncertainty was reduced by decreasing the size of the magnetic field across the C-field zone. The average magnetic field of the atom’s flight trajectory was 49.96±0.20nT. Consequently, its second-order Zeeman frequency shift was 2.0955×10−14, and its frequency uncertainty was 5.1×10−17. This is an important step in advancing the total frequency uncertainty of the fountain clock to the order of 10–17.